MegaETH faces several system errors that break its pre-deposit event.MegaETH faces several system errors that break its pre-deposit event.

Technical glitch forces MegaETH to scrap $1B raise

The pre-deposit event by MegaETH failed on Tuesday due to technical issues that affected the system simultaneously. These problems caused payments to break, users to get stuck, and new deposits to rush in, pushing the raise far above the limit.

MegaETH posted an article on X stating that the event failed due to incorrect setup, incorrect rate limits, and someone opening the Safe transaction too early.

Technical problems hit MegaETH’s pre-deposit system

MegaETH stated that the pre-deposit event was intended to enable verified users to purchase MEGA tokens before the main public launch, thereby avoiding confusion or unfair advantage. However, the event quickly encountered issues due to setup mistakes that made it difficult for users to deposit, caused delays, and pushed the raise far above the planned limits.

For the pre-deposit to work, the MegaETH website, smart contract, and the Sonar service run by Echo had to be flawless; however, each part of the system reported errors simultaneously, causing a chain reaction of problems. Users at the event became frustrated, and the entire program failed in ways that MegaETH had not planned. 

The first problem occurred as soon as the sale opened because the smart contract contained the wrong SaleUUID. MegaETH has to run a multisig transaction to correct the mistake, but it took a while because four out of six signers had to approve it before the system could start working again. And while all this was happening, no deposits could go through, so users became even more stressed.

After fixing the SaleUUID, MegaETH had to focus on the rate limit in the Sonar system that was blocking normal user requests because it considered them spam. People were unable to deposit for more than 20 minutes while the technical team worked to identify and resolve the issue. 

However, once the system started working again, the support team at MegaETH set the pre-deposit to open randomly to make the process fair; however, they did not anticipate the unfairness that followed. The random opening favored users who repeatedly refreshed the page, allowing them to deposit first. 

Those who got a head start quickly filled the $250 million cap almost instantly, long before the others even realized the sale was live again. People waiting their turn were confused, frustrated, and enraged because the system, which was supposed to be fair, turned out to be quite the opposite. 

Early Safe execution pushes deposits far beyond the planned limits

MegaETH aimed to raise the limit to $1 billion within the next hour, after the $250 million cap was filled almost immediately, to ensure a fair sale continued. The team gathered all the required Safe multisig signatures in advance to execute the translation and hit the cap at the right moment. But things didn’t really go as planned. 

The system has a rule that allows anyone to execute a fully signed Safe transaction once it has enough signatures. One team member misunderstood this rule and ran the transaction early, long before the team had initially planned. The results were catastrophic because the deposit system opened to users once more, but this time much sooner than the team expected. Many deposits came in, and no one had control over them, so this overwhelmed the system.

MegaETH tried to lower the cap to $400 million to slow down the rush of deposits, but the deposits had already surpassed that amount by the time the blockchain confirmed this change. The situation grew increasingly chaotic as more users continued to submit deposits at a rapid rate, prompting the team to raise the cap to $500 million. This move successfully froze new deposits, allowing them to manage the situation. 

This $500 million cap also filled up immediately, and MegaETH had to cancel the planned expansion to $1 billion to protect fairness, prevent confusion, and ensure the pre-deposit remained safe and honest. The company promised to release a withdrawal page soon to help users affected by unfairness, so that anyone who deposited under false assumptions could get their money back. 

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 22:30