Key Takeaways: A wallet bought into $JESSE in the very first second of trading. The purchase happened three minutes before the contract address was posted publicly. The early position delivered The post Wallet Snipes $JESSE at First Block, Pulls Off a $600K Launch-Day Win appeared first on CryptoNinjas.Key Takeaways: A wallet bought into $JESSE in the very first second of trading. The purchase happened three minutes before the contract address was posted publicly. The early position delivered The post Wallet Snipes $JESSE at First Block, Pulls Off a $600K Launch-Day Win appeared first on CryptoNinjas.

Wallet Snipes $JESSE at First Block, Pulls Off a $600K Launch-Day Win

Key Takeaways:

  • A wallet bought into $JESSE in the very first second of trading.
  • The purchase happened three minutes before the contract address was posted publicly.
  • The early position delivered an estimated $600,000 profit once volume surged.

A single wallet moved faster than everyone else at the $JESSE launch, slipping in a buy at the exact moment the token went live. The timing turned into a remarkable profit and immediately set off discussions about how launch-day information spreads across crypto.

A Split-Second Trade That Jumped Ahead of the Crowd

The launch of $JESSE unfolded in a way that felt familiar to anyone who follows high-speed token debuts. Liquidity appeared, the contract went live, and within the first second, a wallet fired off a buy transaction that effectively planted its flag before most traders even knew the token existed. That action alone would have drawn attention. What made it more striking was the clock: the trade came three minutes before Jesse Pollak posted the contract address on his public feed.

Memecoin launches often move faster than the conversations around them. Most retail traders wait for the official announcement before joining the scramble, especially for a token tied to a recognizable figure on Base. In this case, the window between deployment and the announcement became the entire story. The wallet caught the first block, while the broader market arrived minutes later.

Sniping at launch is not unusual. What stood out here was the precision. Barely a second passed between the moment liquidity was added and the moment the wallet entered its position. The blockchain shows the trade sitting alone at the very start of price discovery, like a runner who crossed the starting line before most people realized the race had begun.

Read More: Base Now Considering Developing a Network Token

Timing Made the Difference in the First Price Jump

The early purchase shaped the first minutes of the chart because liquidity was still thin. Anyone who has watched these launches knows how quickly prices bounce during the initial blocks. With only a handful of trades in the pool, a single buy can tilt the curve upward. The wallet’s timing placed it squarely at the bottom of that movement.

As soon as the contract address reached the public timeline, trading activity increased sharply. New wallets poured in, volume rose, and the price climbed. The early buyer didn’t need to do anything complicated. The difference between buying at the very first second and everyone else buying after the announcement created more than enough room for a sizable return.

Estimates circulated quickly. Observers pegged the profit near $600,000, based on the gap between the entry point and the price during the early rush. Even without precise sell data, the rough calculation gave a sense of scale. The wallet had positioned itself at the most advantageous point in the chart, long before the crowd arrived.

Community Discussion Turns to Launch Mechanics

Once the profit figure made the rounds, the crypto community began debating how the trade happened so quickly. Some pointed out that bots constantly scan new contract deployments in real time. A deployment on Base or any other network doesn’t stay hidden for long. Traders who rely on those systems can react before a contract address ever hits social media.

Others emphasized that launches like this tend to favor whoever can execute at machine speed. Manual traders wait for a post. Automated systems wait for the blockchain. The difference is measured in minutes on the clock but miles on the chart.

Another part of the discussion focused on the thin liquidity that often accompanies the first moments of a token’s life. A wallet entering in the first block doesn’t just arrive early—it arrives when every dollar of liquidity matters. Even a modest buy can influence the price, and any climb that follows magnifies the advantage.

The Gap Between Deployment and Announcement Continues to Matter

The three-minute delay between deployment and public announcement seemed small on paper, yet it reshaped the entire sequence of events. Launches tend to hinge on tiny gaps like this. A few minutes can separate an early buyer from thousands of latecomers, especially when the token is tied to a well-known name and is guaranteed to attract attention once it appears online.

That gap is where bots thrive. They monitor new contracts, assess them instantly, and execute trades without waiting for human confirmation. The $JESSE launch became another case study showing how big the difference can be between acting on-chain and acting on social signals.

A Single Wallet, One Second, and a Remarkable Return

The $JESSE snipe didn’t need additional drama to make headlines. One trade, placed at the earliest possible moment, was enough. The wallet stepped into the market before the public knew the token was live and walked away with a profit large enough to dominate the discussion around the launch.

The post Wallet Snipes $JESSE at First Block, Pulls Off a $600K Launch-Day Win appeared first on CryptoNinjas.

Market Opportunity
Ambire Wallet Logo
Ambire Wallet Price(WALLET)
$0,00834
$0,00834$0,00834
-12,76%
USD
Ambire Wallet (WALLET) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
Tom Lee’s Bitmine Scoops Up 3.4% of Ethereum, Triggering a Supply Squeeze

Tom Lee’s Bitmine Scoops Up 3.4% of Ethereum, Triggering a Supply Squeeze

Bitmine Immersion now controls 3.4% of Ethereum amid shrinking exchange supply and rising institutional accumulation.
Share
Crypto Breaking News2026/01/20 16:27