The Bureau of Labor Statistics said Wednesday it will not publish the October jobs report, after a 44‑day government shutdown stopped workers from gathering any of the numbers. The agency said the October payroll count will now be bundled with November’s release, and it made clear the October unemployment rate won’t show up in that report either because the data “could not be collected.” The shutdown happened under President Donald Trump, and it froze several federal offices that track the jobs market. The BLS also moved the November jobs report to December 16 from the original December 5 date. That puts the release six days after the Federal Reserve ends its final policy meeting of the year. The September nonfarm payrolls report, already delayed once, will finally come out on Thursday. Traders are now adjusting their expectations because there’s no clean read on where the labor market stands. Traders recalc bets as Fed minutes expose split views With no October jobs data and several Fed officials leaning hawkish in recent comments, traders pushed up the odds that the Fed holds its benchmark rate steady. By midday Wednesday, the CME FedWatch Tool showed a 63.8% chance of the rate staying at 3.75%-4%. That was near 50% earlier in the day. The missing report is forcing markets to guess, and the guessing got louder after the Fed released minutes from its October meeting. Those minutes showed a committee divided over what matters more right now: a slowing labor market or inflation that isn’t dropping fast enough. Even though the Federal Open Market Committee approved a quarter‑point cut, the 10-2 vote didn’t show the full split. Some officials supported the rate cut, saying the economy needed it. Several said they could have gone either way. Others argued against cutting at all. The minutes spelled it out: “Several participants assessed that a further lowering of the target range for the federal funds rate could well be appropriate in December,” while “many participants suggested that… it would likely be appropriate to keep the target range unchanged for the rest of the year.” In Fed language, “many” signals a stronger group than “several.” But none of that tells the public what the voters think, since only 12 out of 19 participants actually vote. Fed Chair Jerome Powell, speaking after the meeting, told reporters a December cut was not a “foregone conclusion.” Before Powell said that, traders were almost certain there would be another cut at the December 9‑10 meeting. By Wednesday afternoon, that probability fell to below a one‑in‑three chance. The minutes did state that “most participants” see more cuts coming in the future, but not necessarily in December. Fed argues policy as shutdown kills key economic reports The minutes also showed that officials were unsure how “restrictive” the current policy really is. Some argued the quarter‑point cut still leaves rates too high for the economy. Others said strong economic activity shows policy might not be restrictive at all. Stephen Miran pushed for a half‑point cut. Jeffrey Schmid voted no, saying he didn’t want a cut under current conditions. Christopher Waller, Michelle Bowman, Susan Collins, and Alberto Musalem all expressed concerns about cutting too much while inflation remains above the Fed’s 2% target. Moderates like Philip Jefferson and John Williams called for patience. The shutdown made the arguments messy. Reports on the labor market, inflation, and other key metrics weren’t collected during the impasse. The BLS and the Bureau of Economic Analysis have announced new release dates for some reports, but not all. Powell said the Fed was “driving in the fog,” though Waller rejected that line on Monday, saying the Fed still has plenty of information. The minutes also confirmed the Fed will stop shrinking its balance sheet in December. The reduction of Treasury and mortgage‑backed securities has cut more than $2.5 trillion so far, but the balance sheet is still around $6.6 trillion. Officials showed broad agreement on ending the process known as quantitative tightening. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.The Bureau of Labor Statistics said Wednesday it will not publish the October jobs report, after a 44‑day government shutdown stopped workers from gathering any of the numbers. The agency said the October payroll count will now be bundled with November’s release, and it made clear the October unemployment rate won’t show up in that report either because the data “could not be collected.” The shutdown happened under President Donald Trump, and it froze several federal offices that track the jobs market. The BLS also moved the November jobs report to December 16 from the original December 5 date. That puts the release six days after the Federal Reserve ends its final policy meeting of the year. The September nonfarm payrolls report, already delayed once, will finally come out on Thursday. Traders are now adjusting their expectations because there’s no clean read on where the labor market stands. Traders recalc bets as Fed minutes expose split views With no October jobs data and several Fed officials leaning hawkish in recent comments, traders pushed up the odds that the Fed holds its benchmark rate steady. By midday Wednesday, the CME FedWatch Tool showed a 63.8% chance of the rate staying at 3.75%-4%. That was near 50% earlier in the day. The missing report is forcing markets to guess, and the guessing got louder after the Fed released minutes from its October meeting. Those minutes showed a committee divided over what matters more right now: a slowing labor market or inflation that isn’t dropping fast enough. Even though the Federal Open Market Committee approved a quarter‑point cut, the 10-2 vote didn’t show the full split. Some officials supported the rate cut, saying the economy needed it. Several said they could have gone either way. Others argued against cutting at all. The minutes spelled it out: “Several participants assessed that a further lowering of the target range for the federal funds rate could well be appropriate in December,” while “many participants suggested that… it would likely be appropriate to keep the target range unchanged for the rest of the year.” In Fed language, “many” signals a stronger group than “several.” But none of that tells the public what the voters think, since only 12 out of 19 participants actually vote. Fed Chair Jerome Powell, speaking after the meeting, told reporters a December cut was not a “foregone conclusion.” Before Powell said that, traders were almost certain there would be another cut at the December 9‑10 meeting. By Wednesday afternoon, that probability fell to below a one‑in‑three chance. The minutes did state that “most participants” see more cuts coming in the future, but not necessarily in December. Fed argues policy as shutdown kills key economic reports The minutes also showed that officials were unsure how “restrictive” the current policy really is. Some argued the quarter‑point cut still leaves rates too high for the economy. Others said strong economic activity shows policy might not be restrictive at all. Stephen Miran pushed for a half‑point cut. Jeffrey Schmid voted no, saying he didn’t want a cut under current conditions. Christopher Waller, Michelle Bowman, Susan Collins, and Alberto Musalem all expressed concerns about cutting too much while inflation remains above the Fed’s 2% target. Moderates like Philip Jefferson and John Williams called for patience. The shutdown made the arguments messy. Reports on the labor market, inflation, and other key metrics weren’t collected during the impasse. The BLS and the Bureau of Economic Analysis have announced new release dates for some reports, but not all. Powell said the Fed was “driving in the fog,” though Waller rejected that line on Monday, saying the Fed still has plenty of information. The minutes also confirmed the Fed will stop shrinking its balance sheet in December. The reduction of Treasury and mortgage‑backed securities has cut more than $2.5 trillion so far, but the balance sheet is still around $6.6 trillion. Officials showed broad agreement on ending the process known as quantitative tightening. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics will not release the October jobs report because the shutdown stopped all data collection

2025/11/20 03:38
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The Bureau of Labor Statistics said Wednesday it will not publish the October jobs report, after a 44‑day government shutdown stopped workers from gathering any of the numbers.

The agency said the October payroll count will now be bundled with November’s release, and it made clear the October unemployment rate won’t show up in that report either because the data “could not be collected.”

The shutdown happened under President Donald Trump, and it froze several federal offices that track the jobs market.

The BLS also moved the November jobs report to December 16 from the original December 5 date. That puts the release six days after the Federal Reserve ends its final policy meeting of the year.

The September nonfarm payrolls report, already delayed once, will finally come out on Thursday. Traders are now adjusting their expectations because there’s no clean read on where the labor market stands.

Traders recalc bets as Fed minutes expose split views

With no October jobs data and several Fed officials leaning hawkish in recent comments, traders pushed up the odds that the Fed holds its benchmark rate steady.

By midday Wednesday, the CME FedWatch Tool showed a 63.8% chance of the rate staying at 3.75%-4%. That was near 50% earlier in the day.

The missing report is forcing markets to guess, and the guessing got louder after the Fed released minutes from its October meeting.

Those minutes showed a committee divided over what matters more right now: a slowing labor market or inflation that isn’t dropping fast enough. Even though the Federal Open Market Committee approved a quarter‑point cut, the 10-2 vote didn’t show the full split.

Some officials supported the rate cut, saying the economy needed it. Several said they could have gone either way. Others argued against cutting at all.

The minutes spelled it out: “Several participants assessed that a further lowering of the target range for the federal funds rate could well be appropriate in December,” while “many participants suggested that… it would likely be appropriate to keep the target range unchanged for the rest of the year.” In Fed language, “many” signals a stronger group than “several.” But none of that tells the public what the voters think, since only 12 out of 19 participants actually vote.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell, speaking after the meeting, told reporters a December cut was not a “foregone conclusion.” Before Powell said that, traders were almost certain there would be another cut at the December 9‑10 meeting.

By Wednesday afternoon, that probability fell to below a one‑in‑three chance. The minutes did state that “most participants” see more cuts coming in the future, but not necessarily in December.

Fed argues policy as shutdown kills key economic reports

The minutes also showed that officials were unsure how “restrictive” the current policy really is. Some argued the quarter‑point cut still leaves rates too high for the economy. Others said strong economic activity shows policy might not be restrictive at all.

Stephen Miran pushed for a half‑point cut. Jeffrey Schmid voted no, saying he didn’t want a cut under current conditions. Christopher Waller, Michelle Bowman, Susan Collins, and Alberto Musalem all expressed concerns about cutting too much while inflation remains above the Fed’s 2% target.

Moderates like Philip Jefferson and John Williams called for patience. The shutdown made the arguments messy. Reports on the labor market, inflation, and other key metrics weren’t collected during the impasse.

The BLS and the Bureau of Economic Analysis have announced new release dates for some reports, but not all. Powell said the Fed was “driving in the fog,” though Waller rejected that line on Monday, saying the Fed still has plenty of information.

The minutes also confirmed the Fed will stop shrinking its balance sheet in December. The reduction of Treasury and mortgage‑backed securities has cut more than $2.5 trillion so far, but the balance sheet is still around $6.6 trillion.

Officials showed broad agreement on ending the process known as quantitative tightening.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0003952
$0.0003952$0.0003952
+2.80%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

bluesky funding disclosed: $100M Series B led

bluesky funding disclosed: $100M Series B led

The post bluesky funding disclosed: $100M Series B led appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a move that underscores growing investor confidence in decentralized
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/20 20:09
Italy passes law on AI outlining privacy and child access

Italy passes law on AI outlining privacy and child access

The post Italy passes law on AI outlining privacy and child access appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Italy has formally passed a sweeping new law to regulate artificial intelligence, becoming the first member of the European Union to roll out comprehensive legislation in step with the bloc’s landmark AI Act. The Italian Senate granted final approval after a year of debate, concluding what Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s government described as a decisive step in shaping how new technologies are deployed across the country. Italy sets tough penalties for offenders The legislation, ministers argue, lays out the boundaries for human-centric, transparent, and safe use of AI while balancing the need to foster innovation, cybersecurity, and economic growth. The law casts its net widely, and it stretches into healthcare, schools, the justice system, workplaces, sport, and the public sector. AI access for children under 14 has also been tightened, and it now requires parental consent. “This law brings innovation back within the perimeter of the public interest, steering AI toward growth, rights and full protection of citizens.” Alessio Butti, the undersecretary for digital transformation. Lawmakers also opted for a hard line on abuses. A new offence has been added to the criminal code covering the unlawful spread of AI-generated or manipulated content, such as deepfakes. Anyone found guilty faces between one and five years in prison if their actions cause harm. Using AI to commit fraud, identity theft, market manipulation, or money laundering will now be treated as an aggravating circumstance, raising potential sentences by a third. Judges remain the sole authority in legal rulings, though courts are empowered to demand rapid takedowns of illicit material. Government agencies to oversee its implementation Responsibility for enforcing the regime lies with the Agency for Digital Italy and the National Cybersecurity Agency, though existing financial watchdogs such as the Bank of Italy and Consob retain powers in their own spheres. The Department…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 06:05
Market Strategist Says the USA Just Nuked XRP. Here’s What Happened

Market Strategist Says the USA Just Nuked XRP. Here’s What Happened

Financial markets do not wait for clarity—they react instantly to tension. When global uncertainty rises, capital moves fast, and risk assets often take the first
Share
Timestabloid2026/03/20 20:05