A court in Berlin has told Google to hand over €573 million to two German websites that compare prices online. The ruling came after the companies claimed they lost business because of how the search giant ran its operations. The Berlin Regional Court made the decision on Thursday evening, but only made it public Friday […]A court in Berlin has told Google to hand over €573 million to two German websites that compare prices online. The ruling came after the companies claimed they lost business because of how the search giant ran its operations. The Berlin Regional Court made the decision on Thursday evening, but only made it public Friday […]

German court orders Google to pay €573 million in antitrust damages

A court in Berlin has told Google to hand over €573 million to two German websites that compare prices online. The ruling came after the companies claimed they lost business because of how the search giant ran its operations.

The Berlin Regional Court made the decision on Thursday evening, but only made it public Friday morning. Idealo, owned by Axel Springer SE, will get €374 million, along with €91 million in extra payments for interest.

The company had asked for €3.3 billion.

In the second case, Producto GmbH will receive €89.7 million plus €17.7 million in interest, though it wanted €290 million.

These court cases go back to a 2017 ruling from the European Commission. That year, regulators hit Google with a €2.4 billion fine for breaking competition rules. Officials said the company used its powerful position in search to push its own shopping service ahead of rivals.

The commission’s decision opened the door for companies to file their own lawsuits seeking money for damages. These cases sat in limbo for years while Google fought the EU fine, according to Bloomberg.

Last year, a court backed up the original finding that Google broke antitrust laws. This means companies in Europe no longer need to prove wrongdoing themselves when they go to court.

Google offers ad tech changes to settle separate EU case

Today, Google said it would make changes to its advertising technology to resolve another EU complaint. As reported by Cryptopolitan, the company faces a nearly €3 billion fine in that case, but hopes its proposed fixes will settle the matter without having to split up parts of its business.

Google said through a blog post that it would let publishers set their own minimum prices when people bid for ad space on its Ad Manager platform. The company also promised to make its ad technology work better with other systems, giving publishers and advertisers more options.

Even with these proposed changes, Google said it still thinks the European Commission got it wrong in its September ruling and plans to fight the decision. EU officials claimed the Alphabet unit gave unfair advantages to its own ad services and demanded the company stop these practices.

Record fines continue to mount against tech giant

Teresa Ribera, who leads competition enforcement for the EU, suggested Google might need to sell off some parts of its advertising business to truly fix the problems. This idea does not go as far as what her predecessor Margrethe Vestager wanted, but Google still sees it as too extreme.

The €2.95 billion fine for the ad tech case ranks as one of Brussels’ biggest punishments. It stands as the second-largest penalty ever given to Google by the EU for abusing its market power. The company previously paid €4.13 billion over its Android mobile system and €2.42 billion for hurting shopping search competitors.

Another €1.49 billion fine related to AdSense was thrown out last year.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Market Opportunity
PUBLIC Logo
PUBLIC Price(PUBLIC)
$0.01907
$0.01907$0.01907
0.00%
USD
PUBLIC (PUBLIC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X, the most widely used app for crypto projects, is changing its API access policy. InfoFi projects, which proliferated non-organic bot content, will be cut off
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/16 02:50
X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

The post X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X has revoked API access for apps that reward users for
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 03:42
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00