The post Feds reject Tornado Cash dev’s bid to overturn conviction appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Journalist Posted: November 14, 2025 Key Takeaways What is Roman Storm trying to do? Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm filed a motion seeking judgment of acquittal after his conviction on charges of operating an unlicensed money transmitting business. What does the government say about Storm’s defense? Prosecutors dismissed Storm’s claim that Tornado Cash was merely “decentralized” code, calling it “decisively disproven at trial.” U.S. prosecutors are pushing back hard against Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm’s attempt to overturn his conviction. They filed a sweeping 113-page brief that brands his defense arguments as “meritless” and contradicted by overwhelming trial evidence. Storm was convicted in a four-week trial on charges of conspiring to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business that knowingly processed criminal proceeds.  The jury heard testimony from 21 witnesses. They also reviewed over 400 government exhibits linking Storm to a sophisticated money laundering operation that mixed billions in cryptocurrency. Government push back on “just code” defense The filing, signed by former SEC Chair Jay Clayton—now U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York—systematically dismantles Storm’s central argument that he merely wrote open-source code with no control over how criminals used it. Also, prosecutors revealed that Storm’s own expert witness admitted that Tornado Cash consisted of “multiple interlocking parts” beyond immutable smart contracts.  Private chat messages showed Storm acknowledged their public “decentralization” narrative was false and that they maintained centralized control points. “The defendant continues to claim that Tornado Cash was nothing more than a decentralized protocol,” prosecutors wrote. “That claim was decisively disproven at trial.” $12 million in hidden profits Evidence showed Storm went to extraordinary lengths to conceal his profits from operating Tornado Cash.  He liquidated over $12 million in TORN governance tokens through a cryptocurrency account registered under a foreign national’s name. Also, he used pseudonyms to… The post Feds reject Tornado Cash dev’s bid to overturn conviction appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Journalist Posted: November 14, 2025 Key Takeaways What is Roman Storm trying to do? Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm filed a motion seeking judgment of acquittal after his conviction on charges of operating an unlicensed money transmitting business. What does the government say about Storm’s defense? Prosecutors dismissed Storm’s claim that Tornado Cash was merely “decentralized” code, calling it “decisively disproven at trial.” U.S. prosecutors are pushing back hard against Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm’s attempt to overturn his conviction. They filed a sweeping 113-page brief that brands his defense arguments as “meritless” and contradicted by overwhelming trial evidence. Storm was convicted in a four-week trial on charges of conspiring to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business that knowingly processed criminal proceeds.  The jury heard testimony from 21 witnesses. They also reviewed over 400 government exhibits linking Storm to a sophisticated money laundering operation that mixed billions in cryptocurrency. Government push back on “just code” defense The filing, signed by former SEC Chair Jay Clayton—now U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York—systematically dismantles Storm’s central argument that he merely wrote open-source code with no control over how criminals used it. Also, prosecutors revealed that Storm’s own expert witness admitted that Tornado Cash consisted of “multiple interlocking parts” beyond immutable smart contracts.  Private chat messages showed Storm acknowledged their public “decentralization” narrative was false and that they maintained centralized control points. “The defendant continues to claim that Tornado Cash was nothing more than a decentralized protocol,” prosecutors wrote. “That claim was decisively disproven at trial.” $12 million in hidden profits Evidence showed Storm went to extraordinary lengths to conceal his profits from operating Tornado Cash.  He liquidated over $12 million in TORN governance tokens through a cryptocurrency account registered under a foreign national’s name. Also, he used pseudonyms to…

Feds reject Tornado Cash dev’s bid to overturn conviction

Key Takeaways

What is Roman Storm trying to do?

Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm filed a motion seeking judgment of acquittal after his conviction on charges of operating an unlicensed money transmitting business.

What does the government say about Storm’s defense?

Prosecutors dismissed Storm’s claim that Tornado Cash was merely “decentralized” code, calling it “decisively disproven at trial.”


U.S. prosecutors are pushing back hard against Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm’s attempt to overturn his conviction. They filed a sweeping 113-page brief that brands his defense arguments as “meritless” and contradicted by overwhelming trial evidence.

Storm was convicted in a four-week trial on charges of conspiring to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business that knowingly processed criminal proceeds. 

The jury heard testimony from 21 witnesses. They also reviewed over 400 government exhibits linking Storm to a sophisticated money laundering operation that mixed billions in cryptocurrency.

Government push back on “just code” defense

The filing, signed by former SEC Chair Jay Clayton—now U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York—systematically dismantles Storm’s central argument that he merely wrote open-source code with no control over how criminals used it.

Also, prosecutors revealed that Storm’s own expert witness admitted that Tornado Cash consisted of “multiple interlocking parts” beyond immutable smart contracts. 

Private chat messages showed Storm acknowledged their public “decentralization” narrative was false and that they maintained centralized control points.

“The defendant continues to claim that Tornado Cash was nothing more than a decentralized protocol,” prosecutors wrote. “That claim was decisively disproven at trial.”

$12 million in hidden profits

Evidence showed Storm went to extraordinary lengths to conceal his profits from operating Tornado Cash. 

He liquidated over $12 million in TORN governance tokens through a cryptocurrency account registered under a foreign national’s name. Also, he used pseudonyms to hide his financial gains from the mixing service.

Additionally, the government argued these hidden profits undermine Storm’s portrayal of Tornado Cash as an altruistic open-source project. 

“His substantial profits, cashed out under a pseudonym, were powerful evidence explaining his criminal intent,” prosecutors wrote. They note that criminal transactions “made up a substantial portion of his business.”

Ronin hack connection

The brief details how Tornado Cash processed hundreds of millions from North Korea’s Ronin Bridge hack. Also, it includes transactions that violated U.S. sanctions against the Lazarus Group. 

Furthermore, Storm allegedly maintained the service’s “relayer system” that facilitated these transactions even after being warned about sanctioned users.

The jury deadlocked on two additional counts: money laundering conspiracy and sanctions violations.

Although prosecutors maintain that the evidence was sufficient for conviction on all charges, the jury was unable to reach a verdict on these two counts.

Previous: Monero [XMR] gains defy privacy-token selloffs, but will it survive Bitcoin’s pullback?
Next: SKY crypto rallies amid $94M TVL boost – But is a pullback next?

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/feds-reject-tornado-cash-devs-bid-to-overturn-conviction/

Market Opportunity
CreatorBid Logo
CreatorBid Price(BID)
$0.02796
$0.02796$0.02796
-1.75%
USD
CreatorBid (BID) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X, the most widely used app for crypto projects, is changing its API access policy. InfoFi projects, which proliferated non-organic bot content, will be cut off
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/16 02:50
X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

The post X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X has revoked API access for apps that reward users for
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 03:42
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00