TLDR Japan Exchange Group is considering stricter rules for companies with large cryptocurrency holdings to ensure investor protection. The Tokyo Stock Exchange operator may impose new audits and review backdoor listing rules for firms shifting focus to crypto. Three companies have paused their plans to acquire cryptocurrencies following pushback from JPX over potential fundraising restrictions. [...] The post Japan Exchange Group Considers Stricter Rules for Crypto Treasury Firms appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Japan Exchange Group is considering stricter rules for companies with large cryptocurrency holdings to ensure investor protection. The Tokyo Stock Exchange operator may impose new audits and review backdoor listing rules for firms shifting focus to crypto. Three companies have paused their plans to acquire cryptocurrencies following pushback from JPX over potential fundraising restrictions. [...] The post Japan Exchange Group Considers Stricter Rules for Crypto Treasury Firms appeared first on CoinCentral.

Japan Exchange Group Considers Stricter Rules for Crypto Treasury Firms

TLDR

  • Japan Exchange Group is considering stricter rules for companies with large cryptocurrency holdings to ensure investor protection.
  • The Tokyo Stock Exchange operator may impose new audits and review backdoor listing rules for firms shifting focus to crypto.
  • Three companies have paused their plans to acquire cryptocurrencies following pushback from JPX over potential fundraising restrictions.
  • Firms with significant crypto holdings, like Strategy Inc. and Metaplanet, have seen their stock values plummet after earlier gains.
  • JPX is closely monitoring digital-asset treasury companies to address rising governance and risk concerns.

The Japan Exchange Group (JPX) is evaluating tighter measures for listed digital-asset treasury companies. This comes as losses from cryptocurrency hoarding raise concerns over investor protection. JPX is considering changes to its backdoor listing rules and may require additional audits for firms increasing crypto holdings. However, no final decisions have been made.

Backdoor Listing Rules Under Review

The operator of the Tokyo Stock Exchange is reassessing its stance on backdoor listings. JPX is considering imposing stricter requirements on companies that shift their focus to crypto accumulation. Currently, backdoor listings involve going public through a merger instead of a traditional IPO. The exchange already bans such listings, but it may apply this prohibition to companies that are pivoting their business models to crypto.

JPX’s review follows growing concerns about the impact of large-scale crypto acquisitions by publicly listed companies. The exchange is focused on protecting shareholders and ensuring good governance practices. A JPX spokesperson mentioned that they are monitoring companies with potential risks to investors.

JPX Warns Firms Against Aggressive Crypto Moves

Shares of companies with large cryptocurrency holdings have fallen sharply. Strategy Inc., for instance, saw its stock drop about 50% since mid-July, following an earlier-year surge. The company had built a Bitcoin treasury valued at around $66 billion. Similarly, Metaplanet, Japan’s largest digital-asset treasury operator, has lost over 75% of its value from its June peak.

Metaplanet transitioned from the hotel business to crypto holdings in early 2024. The company accumulated more than 30,000 Bitcoin, making it one of the largest public holders. Convano, another firm aiming to acquire 21,000 Bitcoin, saw its stock fall by approximately 60% since August.

JPX has faced increasing pressure from these declines. As a result, the exchange has warned three companies against proceeding with plans to acquire cryptocurrencies. The firms were told their fundraising efforts could be restricted if they pursued aggressive crypto strategies.

Hong Kong Follows a Similar Approach

Across Asia, exchanges are scrutinizing digital-asset treasury listings more closely. Hong Kong’s exchange (HKEX) has questioned several firms aiming to list as core crypto treasuries. The Hong Kong regulator reiterated that listed businesses must remain viable and sustainable.

HKEX’s approach requires crypto holdings to be an integral part of the company’s operations. It also limits excessive holdings of liquid assets to protect investors. Japan Exchange Group’s actions align with this regional trend, highlighting rising caution among listed companies about crypto accumulation.

JPX’s recent moves underline a growing trend in Asia of tightening rules for companies with large cryptocurrency positions. As global regulators continue to monitor these developments, the future of digital-asset treasury companies remains uncertain.

The post Japan Exchange Group Considers Stricter Rules for Crypto Treasury Firms appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X, the most widely used app for crypto projects, is changing its API access policy. InfoFi projects, which proliferated non-organic bot content, will be cut off
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/16 02:50
X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

The post X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X has revoked API access for apps that reward users for
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 03:42
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00