Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin and prominent developers have published the “Trustless Manifesto“, a sweeping declaration demanding that blockchain systems prioritize mathematical verification over intermediary trust. The document arrives amid mounting criticism that Ethereum’s ecosystem has drifted toward centralization, despite public commitments to decentralization. Just last month, former core developers revealed that a small group of insiders effectively controls project success and protocol direction. The manifesto asserts that trustlessness, where system correctness relies solely on mathematics and consensus rather than the goodwill of intermediaries. “Ethereum was not created to make finance efficient or apps convenient,” the authors write. “It was created to set people free.“ Manifesto Sets Six Core Requirements for Decentralized Systems The document establishes strict criteria for trustless design: Self-sovereignty, where users authorize their own actions Verifiability through public data Censorship resistance within reasonable timeframes Operator replaceability without approval Practical accessibility beyond technical experts Transparent incentive structures. Removing any requirement causes systems to “drift from protocol to platform—from neutral ground to private property,” according to the text. The manifesto applies three laws prohibiting critical secrets held by single actors, indispensable intermediaries that users cannot realistically replace, and unverifiable outcomes lacking public reproducibility. “These laws are harsh,” the authors acknowledge. “They limit what we can build easily—but they are the only guarantee that what we build belongs to everyone.“ Beyond theoretical frameworks, the document warns that centralization already permeates Ethereum’s infrastructure through hosted RPCs serving as defaults, AWS-GCP-Cloudflare dependency creating single points of failure, and centralized sequencing in many rollups. “Decentralization erodes not through capture, but through convenience,” the manifesto states, comparing the trajectory to email’s evolution, where spam filters and blocklists made self-hosted servers practically impossible despite remaining theoretically open. Former Developer Exposes ‘Elite Control’ Contradicting Decentralization Claims The manifesto’s release follows bombshell revelations from former Geth lead developer Péter Szilágyi, who published a May 2024 letter exposing how five to ten people around Buterin maintain “complete indirect control” over Ethereum’s direction through attention allocation, donations, investments, and researcher assignments. Projects no longer conduct public offerings but instead secure backing from the same insiders, creating what Szilágyi called a “ruling elite” where success requires convincing “the correct 5-10 people around Vitalik—or even him—to commit.“ Separately, Szilágyi revealed he earned just $625,000 over six years managing Ethereum’s primary execution client with zero benefits or raises, describing Foundation employment as “a bad financial decision” that created “a perfect breeding ground for perverse incentives, conflicts of interests, and eventual protocol capture.“ He warned the Foundation “set the protocol up for capture” by underpaying contributors who cared about principles, forcing them to seek compensation elsewhere, while those remaining felt like “useful fools” watching big players reshape the protocol. Sentiments at the time summarize the dynamic as “we’re happy you built an empire for us, now move aside and let the people who can make us money take the lead,” according to Szilágyi. Paradigm’s Growing Influence Over Ethereum Separate warnings also emerged during the same time when Ethereum core developer “Fede’s intern” cautioned that venture capital firm Paradigm’s influence “within Ethereum could become a relevant tail risk for the ecosystem.” Paradigm manages $12.7 billion and has positioned itself across multiple fronts, including hiring top researchers, funding critical open-source libraries like Reth, and launching Tempo. Tempo is a competing layer-1 blockchain that has raised $500 million at a $5 billion valuation from traditional finance firms, including Greenoaks, Thrive, Stripe, and Sequoia. The concerns intensified following the departure of longtime Ethereum Foundation researcher Dankrad Feist to Tempo, where Paradigm co-founder Matt Huang serves as CEO while retaining his role at the venture firm. “When corporations gain too much legibility and influence over open source projects, priorities start to drift away from the community’s long term vision and toward corporate incentives,” the developer warned, noting Paradigm’s failed FTX investment led them to “remove most references to crypto and pivot heavily toward AI.”Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin and prominent developers have published the “Trustless Manifesto“, a sweeping declaration demanding that blockchain systems prioritize mathematical verification over intermediary trust. The document arrives amid mounting criticism that Ethereum’s ecosystem has drifted toward centralization, despite public commitments to decentralization. Just last month, former core developers revealed that a small group of insiders effectively controls project success and protocol direction. The manifesto asserts that trustlessness, where system correctness relies solely on mathematics and consensus rather than the goodwill of intermediaries. “Ethereum was not created to make finance efficient or apps convenient,” the authors write. “It was created to set people free.“ Manifesto Sets Six Core Requirements for Decentralized Systems The document establishes strict criteria for trustless design: Self-sovereignty, where users authorize their own actions Verifiability through public data Censorship resistance within reasonable timeframes Operator replaceability without approval Practical accessibility beyond technical experts Transparent incentive structures. Removing any requirement causes systems to “drift from protocol to platform—from neutral ground to private property,” according to the text. The manifesto applies three laws prohibiting critical secrets held by single actors, indispensable intermediaries that users cannot realistically replace, and unverifiable outcomes lacking public reproducibility. “These laws are harsh,” the authors acknowledge. “They limit what we can build easily—but they are the only guarantee that what we build belongs to everyone.“ Beyond theoretical frameworks, the document warns that centralization already permeates Ethereum’s infrastructure through hosted RPCs serving as defaults, AWS-GCP-Cloudflare dependency creating single points of failure, and centralized sequencing in many rollups. “Decentralization erodes not through capture, but through convenience,” the manifesto states, comparing the trajectory to email’s evolution, where spam filters and blocklists made self-hosted servers practically impossible despite remaining theoretically open. Former Developer Exposes ‘Elite Control’ Contradicting Decentralization Claims The manifesto’s release follows bombshell revelations from former Geth lead developer Péter Szilágyi, who published a May 2024 letter exposing how five to ten people around Buterin maintain “complete indirect control” over Ethereum’s direction through attention allocation, donations, investments, and researcher assignments. Projects no longer conduct public offerings but instead secure backing from the same insiders, creating what Szilágyi called a “ruling elite” where success requires convincing “the correct 5-10 people around Vitalik—or even him—to commit.“ Separately, Szilágyi revealed he earned just $625,000 over six years managing Ethereum’s primary execution client with zero benefits or raises, describing Foundation employment as “a bad financial decision” that created “a perfect breeding ground for perverse incentives, conflicts of interests, and eventual protocol capture.“ He warned the Foundation “set the protocol up for capture” by underpaying contributors who cared about principles, forcing them to seek compensation elsewhere, while those remaining felt like “useful fools” watching big players reshape the protocol. Sentiments at the time summarize the dynamic as “we’re happy you built an empire for us, now move aside and let the people who can make us money take the lead,” according to Szilágyi. Paradigm’s Growing Influence Over Ethereum Separate warnings also emerged during the same time when Ethereum core developer “Fede’s intern” cautioned that venture capital firm Paradigm’s influence “within Ethereum could become a relevant tail risk for the ecosystem.” Paradigm manages $12.7 billion and has positioned itself across multiple fronts, including hiring top researchers, funding critical open-source libraries like Reth, and launching Tempo. Tempo is a competing layer-1 blockchain that has raised $500 million at a $5 billion valuation from traditional finance firms, including Greenoaks, Thrive, Stripe, and Sequoia. The concerns intensified following the departure of longtime Ethereum Foundation researcher Dankrad Feist to Tempo, where Paradigm co-founder Matt Huang serves as CEO while retaining his role at the venture firm. “When corporations gain too much legibility and influence over open source projects, priorities start to drift away from the community’s long term vision and toward corporate incentives,” the developer warned, noting Paradigm’s failed FTX investment led them to “remove most references to crypto and pivot heavily toward AI.”

Ethereum Leaders Launch ‘Trustless Manifesto’ to Protect Crypto Decentralization

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin and prominent developers have published the “Trustless Manifesto“, a sweeping declaration demanding that blockchain systems prioritize mathematical verification over intermediary trust.

The document arrives amid mounting criticism that Ethereum’s ecosystem has drifted toward centralization, despite public commitments to decentralization.

Just last month, former core developers revealed that a small group of insiders effectively controls project success and protocol direction.

The manifesto asserts that trustlessness, where system correctness relies solely on mathematics and consensus rather than the goodwill of intermediaries.

Ethereum was not created to make finance efficient or apps convenient,” the authors write. “It was created to set people free.

Manifesto Sets Six Core Requirements for Decentralized Systems

The document establishes strict criteria for trustless design:

  • Self-sovereignty, where users authorize their own actions
  • Verifiability through public data
  • Censorship resistance within reasonable timeframes
  • Operator replaceability without approval
  • Practical accessibility beyond technical experts
  • Transparent incentive structures.

Removing any requirement causes systems to “drift from protocol to platform—from neutral ground to private property,” according to the text.

The manifesto applies three laws prohibiting critical secrets held by single actors, indispensable intermediaries that users cannot realistically replace, and unverifiable outcomes lacking public reproducibility.

These laws are harsh,” the authors acknowledge. “They limit what we can build easily—but they are the only guarantee that what we build belongs to everyone.

Beyond theoretical frameworks, the document warns that centralization already permeates Ethereum’s infrastructure through hosted RPCs serving as defaults, AWS-GCP-Cloudflare dependency creating single points of failure, and centralized sequencing in many rollups.

Decentralization erodes not through capture, but through convenience,” the manifesto states, comparing the trajectory to email’s evolution, where spam filters and blocklists made self-hosted servers practically impossible despite remaining theoretically open.

Former Developer Exposes ‘Elite Control’ Contradicting Decentralization Claims

The manifesto’s release follows bombshell revelations from former Geth lead developer Péter Szilágyi, who published a May 2024 letter exposing how five to ten people around Buterin maintain “complete indirect control” over Ethereum’s direction through attention allocation, donations, investments, and researcher assignments.

Projects no longer conduct public offerings but instead secure backing from the same insiders, creating what Szilágyi called a “ruling elite” where success requires convincing “the correct 5-10 people around Vitalik—or even him—to commit.

Separately, Szilágyi revealed he earned just $625,000 over six years managing Ethereum’s primary execution client with zero benefits or raises, describing Foundation employment as “a bad financial decision” that created “a perfect breeding ground for perverse incentives, conflicts of interests, and eventual protocol capture.

He warned the Foundation “set the protocol up for capture” by underpaying contributors who cared about principles, forcing them to seek compensation elsewhere, while those remaining felt like “useful fools” watching big players reshape the protocol.

Sentiments at the time summarize the dynamic as “we’re happy you built an empire for us, now move aside and let the people who can make us money take the lead,” according to Szilágyi.

Paradigm’s Growing Influence Over Ethereum

Separate warnings also emerged during the same time when Ethereum core developer “Fede’s intern” cautioned that venture capital firm Paradigm’s influence “within Ethereum could become a relevant tail risk for the ecosystem.

Paradigm manages $12.7 billion and has positioned itself across multiple fronts, including hiring top researchers, funding critical open-source libraries like Reth, and launching Tempo.

Tempo is a competing layer-1 blockchain that has raised $500 million at a $5 billion valuation from traditional finance firms, including Greenoaks, Thrive, Stripe, and Sequoia.

The concerns intensified following the departure of longtime Ethereum Foundation researcher Dankrad Feist to Tempo, where Paradigm co-founder Matt Huang serves as CEO while retaining his role at the venture firm.

When corporations gain too much legibility and influence over open source projects, priorities start to drift away from the community’s long term vision and toward corporate incentives,” the developer warned, noting Paradigm’s failed FTX investment led them to “remove most references to crypto and pivot heavily toward AI.”

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan

Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan

The firm has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to launch a $4 billion at-the-market (ATM) equity program, […] The post Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 04:15
UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

The post UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The UK and US are reportedly preparing to deepen cooperation on digital assets, with Britain looking to copy the Trump administration’s crypto-friendly stance in a bid to boost innovation.  UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed on Tuesday how the two nations could strengthen their coordination on crypto, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter.  The discussions also involved representatives from crypto companies, including Coinbase, Circle Internet Group and Ripple, with executives from the Bank of America, Barclays and Citi also attending, according to the report. The agreement was made “last-minute” after crypto advocacy groups urged the UK government on Thursday to adopt a more open stance toward the industry, claiming its cautious approach to the sector has left the country lagging in innovation and policy.  Source: Rachel Reeves Deal to include stablecoins, look to unlock adoption Any deal between the countries is likely to include stablecoins, the Financial Times reported, an area of crypto that US President Donald Trump made a policy priority and in which his family has significant business interests. The Financial Times reported on Monday that UK crypto advocacy groups also slammed the Bank of England’s proposal to limit individual stablecoin holdings to between 10,000 British pounds ($13,650) and 20,000 pounds ($27,300), claiming it would be difficult and expensive to implement. UK banks appear to have slowed adoption too, with around 40% of 2,000 recently surveyed crypto investors saying that their banks had either blocked or delayed a payment to a crypto provider.  Many of these actions have been linked to concerns over volatility, fraud and scams. The UK has made some progress on crypto regulation recently, proposing a framework in May that would see crypto exchanges, dealers, and agents treated similarly to traditional finance firms, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:21
Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token

Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token

The post Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Google has announced the launch of a new open-source protocol called Agent Payments Protocol (AP2) in partnership with Coinbase, the Ethereum Foundation, and 60 other organizations. This allows AI agents to make payments on behalf of users using various methods such as real-time bank transfers, credit and debit cards, and, most importantly, stablecoins. Let’s explore in detail what this could mean for the broader cryptocurrency markets, and also highlight a presale crypto (Best Wallet Token) that could explode as a result of this development. Google’s Push for Stablecoins Agent Payments Protocol (AP2) uses digital contracts known as ‘Intent Mandates’ and ‘Verifiable Credentials’ to ensure that AI agents undertake only those payments authorized by the user. Mandates, by the way, are cryptographically signed, tamper-proof digital contracts that act as verifiable proof of a user’s instruction. For example, let’s say you instruct an AI agent to never spend more than $200 in a single transaction. This instruction is written into an Intent Mandate, which serves as a digital contract. Now, whenever the AI agent tries to make a payment, it must present this mandate as proof of authorization, which will then be verified via the AP2 protocol. Alongside this, Google has also launched the A2A x402 extension to accelerate support for the Web3 ecosystem. This production-ready solution enables agent-based crypto payments and will help reshape the growth of cryptocurrency integration within the AP2 protocol. Google’s inclusion of stablecoins in AP2 is a massive vote of confidence in dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies and a huge step toward making them a mainstream payment option. This widens stablecoin usage beyond trading and speculation, positioning them at the center of the consumption economy. The recent enactment of the GENIUS Act in the U.S. gives stablecoins more structure and legal support. Imagine paying for things like data crawls, per-task…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:27