SEI beats BNB Chain in the stablecoin race

Recent metrics show the overtaking of the SEI network over BNB Chain in stablecoin supply, driven by consistent trading and DeFi activities. This reflects a rapid shift of liquidity towards faster and low-cost Layer‑1s preferred by market makers and automated strategies. In this context, the focus on execution and costs has attracted a wave of concentrated deposits.

Stablecoin: How SEI Surpassed BNB Chain in 24 Hours

According to Artemis, SEI has surpassed BNB Chain in the growth of stablecoin supply over the past 24‑hour. However, the movement seems to be linked to a burst of deposits and transfers related to new trading activity on SEI, rather than a broad market reallocation.

Observers noted that the shift occurred within a narrow time frame and coincided with the launch of new protocols, which amplify the signal. Consequently, traders and liquidity providers quickly responded to perceived advantages in execution.

As reported in a tweet by Marc Shawn Brown on November 12, 2025, which referenced Artemis, the spike caught the attention of on‑chain analysts. However, such short windows should be treated as initial signals and not as definite regime changes, until weekly repetitions occur.

Sei vs BNB Chain: Impacts on Users and Liquidity

The emerging dynamics between SEI and BNB Chain are shifting user activity towards efficient Layer‑1s that prioritize trading performance and reduced operational costs. Additionally, BNB Chain remains relatively flat as capital reallocates towards networks with tighter execution and less expensive transfers.

For this reason, liquidity concentration can shift rapidly when a network demonstrates measurable advantages; therefore, specialized venues attract orderflow in a short time. On the other hand, users should compare fees and expected slippage across chains, as small differences become significant for high-frequency strategies.

The increase in DeFi projects launching or migrating to SEI is boosting on‑chain volume. Indeed, this DeFi adoption on Sei multiplies turnover and order book depth, further fueling the growth of the stablecoin supply.

What technical design makes SEI efficient and low-cost

SEI has been designed for low-latency trading, deterministic block times, parallel execution, and optimizations at the matching layer level that reduce friction for market participants. Additionally, these choices promote rapid finality and predictable order processes.

It must be said that architecture affects market microstructure; in fact, throughput alone does not guarantee tighter spreads. In our growth analysis work, the combination of parallel execution and deterministic block times proves crucial for exchange loads.

Parallel Execution and Deterministic Timing to Support Trading

Parallel execution allows independent transactions to be processed simultaneously, reducing queue delays during peak times. Additionally, deterministic block times provide predictable execution windows, enabling strategies to estimate latency and risk with greater precision.

All this creates an environment where traders can expect more consistent fill probabilities, improving conditions for algorithmic market makers. Consequently, predictable timing and concurrent processing reduce the cost of adverse selection.

DeFi Adoption on Sei and Transaction Speed Driving Volume

The supply of stablecoins on SEI has increased due to the adoption of DeFi, low fees, and fast transactions on Sei, as protocols migrate and boost on‑chain turnover. Additionally, the new primitives on SEI introduce capital and cash flows that drive greater circulation of stablecoins.

The strong demand from decentralized exchanges and lending platforms has been a central driver of the cycle. Therefore, monitoring project announcements and migration timelines helps predict volume spikes.

7‑day inflows	+X%
24‑hour spike	observed

Trigger	new protocols
Consequence	concentrated inflow

Trend	execution search
Risk	short window movements

For analysts, the immediate task is to observe whether the pattern persists beyond daily snapshots; moreover, current signals indicate a significant rebalancing among chains where trading efficiency matters. In practice, teams should keep an eye on 7‑day rolling stablecoin inflows and DEX taker volume.

A sustained growth exceeding 20% week over week in revenues or a doubling of the local orderbook depth would constitute clearer evidence of a regime change. Finally, as highlighted by Marc Shawn Brown on November 12, 2025, short windows can attract concentrated liquidity moves but require confirmations over consecutive weeks.

Overall, the signal is clear but needs verification: the rapid growth of the stablecoin supply on SEI is a warning sign that warrants continuous monitoring to distinguish a temporary opportunity from a lasting trend. However, for immediate assessments, on‑chain tools like Artemis remain useful for separating one‑off bursts from repeated patterns.