Hacken unveils Yield Audits and Yield Risk Score, a D-to-AAA framework that evaluates the security, sustainability and systemic risk of crypto yield products.Hacken unveils Yield Audits and Yield Risk Score, a D-to-AAA framework that evaluates the security, sustainability and systemic risk of crypto yield products.

Hacken Unveils Yield Risk Score to Standardize Crypto Yield Risk

hacken

In the wake of its TRUST Summit at Nasdaq MarketSite, where bank and ratings executives debated how to marry traditional finance standards with digital assets, blockchain security firm Hacken has unveiled what it calls a first-of-its-kind standard for measuring risk in crypto yield products: the Yield Risk Score, or YRS. The new Yield Audit and its D-to-AAA scoring framework aim to give both retail savers and institutional allocators a straightforward, third-party way to judge whether a yield is real, sustainable and resilient to contagion, a need made painfully obvious by high-profile failures this year and in prior market crashes.

Hacken’s move follows a day of frank conversations at the TRUST Summit in New York, where leaders from Nasdaq, Moody’s Ratings, S&P Global, Citi and major banks discussed the rising tide of institutional interest in digital assets and the gaps that still prevent large pools of capital from deploying. Stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets are forecast to balloon as banks secure licenses and look for sustainable yield, but institutional investors insist on auditability and independent verification before they commit.

The timing is hardly accidental. On November 3, Stream Finance disclosed an external manager had lost roughly $93 million of platform assets, a blow that sent its stablecoin plunging and forced the protocol to suspend deposits and withdrawals while lawyers probe the loss. The episode is the latest in a string of yield-related calamities that highlight the economic and dependency risks beyond smart-contract bugs.

Hacken’s own research, published alongside the service launch, underscores the scale of the problem: yield providers have been tied to roughly 55% of crypto losses, with 330 yield protocols losing an estimated $49 billion over the last five years. Those figures are the backbone of Hacken’s argument that DeFi needs an independent, auditable way to translate technical, economic and counterparty risk into a single, comparable metric.

Crypto’s Missing Credit Rating

The Yield Audit process is deliberately broader than a conventional smart-contract review. Instead of focusing only on code, Hacken assesses three interlocking pillars: the security and infrastructure layer (how custody, distribution logic and operational controls are set up), the financial sustainability of the promised yield (are returns backed by real revenue and stress-tested liquidity) and dependency or systemic risk (how exposed the product is to oracles, bridges, custodians and jurisdictional fragilities). Those three sub-scores are combined into the composite YRS, which projects can publish as a verified certificate while keeping proprietary details private.

“Banks are heavily regulated. Stablecoins are not,” said Dyma Budorin, Hacken Chairman and Co-Founder. He added, “Fund managers, in many cases, can’t even allocate liquidity unless a third party has reviewed the product.” Budorin explained that a high YRS is increasingly becoming the prerequisite for confidence, funding and liquidity growth. The sentiment echoes a broader industry shift: institutional participants want the same kinds of signals, independent audits, disclosure, and continuous monitoring that they rely on in legacy markets.

Hacken will back its scores with continuous monitoring through Extractor, the company’s real-time on- and off-chain threat detection and response platform, so YRS certificates can be kept current without forcing projects to reveal sensitive strategy details. That disclosure control, Hacken says, is key to striking a balance between market transparency and commercial confidentiality.

The launch also positions Hacken as a continuing bridge between traditional capital markets and crypto. The firm pioneered Proof of Reserves audits in the wake of exchange failures, and it has conducted high-profile verifications and security assessments for major industry players. Hacken argues that the Yield Audit plays the same role for yield products as credit ratings or audited disclosures do for fixed-income markets, a standardized label that asset managers and compliance teams can use when making allocation decisions.

Critically, the YRS isn’t only aimed at DeFi native projects. Hacken expects stablecoin wrappers, centralized exchange yield products, and tokenized real-world asset issuers to seek the rating as a way to unlock institutional tickets and attract sustainable total value locked (TVL). The Terra-Anchor collapse of 2022 remains the cautionary tale: promised double-digit yields that rested on refillable “yield reserves” and perpetual inflows imploded, vaporizing tens of billions and dragging large counterparties into ruin.

Regulators and allocators alike remember those systemic losses, and Hacken’s YRS is pitched as a tool to prevent repeats. Market reaction will be the real test. Hacken has spent years building credibility with smart-contract audits and Proof of Reserves services; whether the industry, and especially wary institutional allocators, will adopt the Yield Risk Score as a standard remains to be seen.

For now, the YRS offers a clear, auditable vocabulary for a market that desperately needs one: a way to say, in a single metric, whether a yield is backed by real economics or by clever accounting and counterparty risk. Hacken, founded in 2017 and trusted by hundreds of digital-asset leaders, is pitching Yield Audits as the missing credit-rating equivalent for crypto yield. If institutions heed that signal, the shape of yield markets, and the flow of trillions in coming years, could depend on it.

Market Opportunity
DAR Open Network Logo
DAR Open Network Price(D)
$0.01325
$0.01325$0.01325
-3.98%
USD
DAR Open Network (D) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

The post QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. QNT’s MACD histogram showing a positive trend and RSI stabilizing in the neutral zone
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/21 23:54
SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

The post SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shiba Inu is forming a death cross
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 00:26