Setting up AWS EKS manually takes 2-4 weeks. rapid-eks does it in 13 minutes with production best practices: multi-AZ VPC, Karpenter autoscaling, Prometheus monitoring, AWS Load Balancer Controller. One command. Zero YAML hell. Destroy just as fast. Open source (MIT). Built because I was tired of burning sprints on infrastructure.Setting up AWS EKS manually takes 2-4 weeks. rapid-eks does it in 13 minutes with production best practices: multi-AZ VPC, Karpenter autoscaling, Prometheus monitoring, AWS Load Balancer Controller. One command. Zero YAML hell. Destroy just as fast. Open source (MIT). Built because I was tired of burning sprints on infrastructure.

Rapid-eks – Production EKS in 13 minutes with Terraform + Python

Hey HN! I built rapid-eks - a CLI that deploys production-ready AWS EKS clusters in 13 minutes (validated).

GitHub: https://github.com/jtaylortech/rapid-eks

The Problem

I've set up EKS at 5+ companies. Every time, same 2-4 week grind:

  • Multi-AZ VPC with proper CIDR planning
  • IRSA (IAM Roles for Service Accounts) - always breaks
  • Karpenter, ALB Controller, Prometheus - manual Helm hell
  • IAM policies that are too permissive or too restrictive
  • Debugging "why can't my pod access S3?"

It's undifferentiated heavy lifting. Same bugs, every time.

How It Works

rapid-eks is a Python CLI that generates and manages Terraform:

  1. Config validation (Pydantic) - Type-safe YAML parsing
  2. Preflight checks - AWS creds, Terraform version, kubectl, quotas
  3. Terraform generation (Jinja2) - Uses official AWS modules
  4. Deployment - Runs terraform apply with progress tracking
  5. Health validation - Waits for cluster/nodes/addons to be ready
  6. IRSA configuration - Automatically sets up pod→AWS auth

All generated Terraform lives in .rapid-eks/ - you can inspect/modify it.

What You Get (13 minutes)

Infrastructure:

  • Multi-AZ VPC (3 AZs, 6 subnets, 3 NAT gateways)
  • EKS 1.31 with OIDC provider
  • Managed node group (t3.medium, 2-4 nodes, autoscaling)

Addons (with IRSA):

  • Karpenter - Node autoscaling with spot instance support
  • AWS Load Balancer Controller - Native ALB/NLB integration
  • Prometheus + Grafana - Monitoring stack

Security:

  • IRSA for all workloads (no static credentials)
  • Least-privilege IAM policies
  • Private subnets for nodes
  • Security groups with minimal access

Technical Details

Stack:

  • Python 3.11+ with type hints (Pydantic for validation)
  • Jinja2 templates for Terraform generation
  • Click for CLI, Rich for output
  • Uses official terraform-aws-modules (vpc, eks, iam)

Why generate Terraform vs pure Python?

  • Terraform state management is battle-tested
  • AWS modules are well-maintained
  • Users can inspect/modify generated code
  • Easier to debug than boto3 API calls
  • Idempotent by default

Preflight checks:

def validate_aws_credentials(): """Verify AWS creds work and have necessary permissions""" try: sts = boto3.client('sts') identity = sts.get_caller_identity() # Check for required IAM permissions return True except ClientError: return False

IRSA setup:

  • Creates OIDC provider for cluster
  • Generates IAM roles with trust policies
  • Annotates ServiceAccounts with role ARNs
  • Validates pod→AWS auth works

Health validation:

def wait_for_cluster_ready(cluster_name, region, timeout=600): """Poll EKS API until cluster is ACTIVE""" eks = boto3.client('eks', region_name=region) start = time.time() while time.time() - start < timeout: cluster = eks.describe_cluster(name=cluster_name) if cluster['cluster']['status'] == 'ACTIVE': return True time.sleep(10) return False

Try It

pip install git+https://github.com/jtaylortech/rapid-eks.git rapid-eks create demo --region us-east-1 # ~13 minutes later kubectl get nodes

Destroy is just as fast:

rapid-eks destroy demo --auto-approve # ~17 minutes, validates clean removal

Feedback Wanted

  • Edge cases I'm missing?
  • Additional addons needed? (cert-manager, external-dns, etc.)
  • AWS regions with issues?
  • Better IRSA patterns?
  • Documentation gaps?

All code is on GitHub, MIT licensed. Issues and PRs welcome.

https://github.com/jtaylortech/rapid-eks/tree/main/docs?embedable=true

\

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0,02085
$0,02085$0,02085
-4,70%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

The post QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. QNT’s MACD histogram showing a positive trend and RSI stabilizing in the neutral zone
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/21 23:54
SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

The post SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shiba Inu is forming a death cross
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 00:26