A practical scope, sprint, and CI/CD blueprint any small team can copy.
Why another MVP guide?
Most MVPs fail from scope creep, fragile infrastructure, or slow feedback loops—not from lack of ideas. This guide focuses on a minimal but reliable path to get real users touching a real product quickly, with just enough quality gates to avoid rewrites.
Week 0: Define “done” and remove uncertainty
- Problem statement in one sentence
- Three primary use cases
- One success metric (e.g., first task completion or first payment)
- Non‑negotiables: auth, audit logs, basic observability, backups
- Nice‑to‑haves explicitly parked
Artifacts: a one‑page PRD and a simple system sketch (client → API → DB → third‑party).
Weeks 1–2: Ship a running skeleton
- Repos: monorepo or two (web/mobile + API)
- Choose boring, proven stack (e.g., Next.js/React + Node/Laravel + Postgres)
- Implement: auth, roles, seed data, feature flags, error tracking, health checks
- Deploy to staging by day 3
Quality gates: lint, unit tests for core domains, pre‑commit hooks, CI under 10 minutes.
# .github/workflows/ci.yml (example) name: CI on: [push, pull_request] jobs: build_test: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: { node-version: '20' } - run: npm ci - run: npm run lint && npm test -- --ci
Weeks 3–4: Deliver thin vertical slices
Ship features as user‑visible slices, not layers.
Slice template
- Small spec (Given/When/Then)
- API contract + happy‑path test
- UI with states: empty, loading, error, success
- Telemetry: event
feature_used
- Docs: 5 lines in CHANGELOG + a short GIF for QA
Weeks 5–6: Stabilize and prove value
- Add acceptance tests for the top flows
- Load test the slowest endpoint (target p95 < 500 ms)
- Backup + restore rehearsal
- Observability dashboard: errors, latency, signups, first‑success rate
- Release notes → pilot users
The MVP baseline checklist
- Authentication with rate limiting and secure password storage
- Authorization (least privilege)
- Input validation and request size limits
- Centralized logging + error alerts
- Daily backups + restore tested
- Feature flags for risky changes
- Basic privacy page + terms; collect minimal PII
Estimation that doesn’t lie
Estimate only the next two weeks. Use t‑shirt sizing for backlog and convert S/M/L to hours after splitting stories. Track only completed story points to set the next sprint’s capacity.
A note on architecture
Prefer simple: a single Postgres, a single API service, a single web app. Add queues or microservices only for real bottlenecks. Complexity taxes you every day.
Example backlog (first 6 weeks)
- Sign‑up/sign‑in, email verify, password reset
- Org + roles (owner, user)
- Core object CRUD + search
- Import CSV (happy path)
- Event tracking + simple dashboard
- Stripe test payments (if relevant)
- Admin toggles via feature flags
- Docs: getting started + FAQ
What to measure (and why)
- Activation: % of signups completing first core task
- Latency p95: user‑perceived speed
- Error rate: alerts per 1k requests
- Retention (week‑over‑week): are users coming back?
Releasing without fear
- Every PR passes CI
- Staging auto‑deploys on merge; production behind a manual approval and feature flag
- Rollback plan = previous container tag + DB migration down steps
- Post‑release audit: top errors, time‑to‑fix, next mitigation
Common traps (and exits)
- Endless polishing: fix a time box; ship to 5 real users
- Framework shopping: pick one you already know
- Premature scaling: more instances don’t cure poor queries—profile first
- Analytics soup: track 3 events tied to your success metric; nothing more
Resources to copy
- OWASP ASVS (baseline security)
- Twelve‑Factor App (ops sanity)
- GitHub Actions marketplace test/lint actions
\
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.