The DeFi world is reeling from the chaos surrounding Meteora and its disgraced founder Benjamin Chow. What began as a promising Solana-based liquidity protocol has erupted into scandal after revelations that the founder personally sent more than $1.2 million worth of MET airdrops to wallets connected to the Melania memecoin rugpull. These revelations surfaced just days before Chow was hit with an expansive U.S. class-action lawsuit accusing him of orchestrating multiple fraudulent schemes involving celebrity-themed tokens. In the past week alone, MET’s price has cratered 36%, but analysts warn that the fall could be far from over. The lawsuit accuses Chow and his affiliates of manipulating up to 15 tokens involving memes like “MELANIA” and “LIBRA,” each showing telltale “pump-and-dump” price patterns. Beyond the scandal’s legal dimensions, what makes Meteora’s implosion truly significant is that it exposes how much of DeFi’s token economy still depends on opaque allocation and insider favoritism. Investors had almost no visibility into the airdrop criteria, and founder-controlled wallets could be weaponized for self-enrichment. As investors rushed to exit, protocols like Orca and Raydium have been absorbing Meteora’s lost total value locked (TVL), increasing their market dominance across Solana’s DEX landscape. Capital flight from Meteora has accelerated, suggesting that users no longer view it as a safe liquidity hub. What we’re witnessing could spark a broader call for DeFi governance reform — especially as on-chain data reveals that founder-linked wallets in other projects are quietly cashing out during airdrop windows. The broader market implication is a crisis of trust. Transparent distribution now matters as much as yield performance. Projects that fail to show verifiable distribution logic face existential risk. Meteora didn’t just lose market share — it lost whatever remained of DeFi’s optimistic assumption that decentralization automatically equals honesty. Its collapse might be painful, but the reckoning it triggers may finally force the industry’s next evolution: accountability in protocol design. The Meteora Meltdown: How a $1.2 Million Airdrop Triggered a DeFi Reckoning was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this storyThe DeFi world is reeling from the chaos surrounding Meteora and its disgraced founder Benjamin Chow. What began as a promising Solana-based liquidity protocol has erupted into scandal after revelations that the founder personally sent more than $1.2 million worth of MET airdrops to wallets connected to the Melania memecoin rugpull. These revelations surfaced just days before Chow was hit with an expansive U.S. class-action lawsuit accusing him of orchestrating multiple fraudulent schemes involving celebrity-themed tokens. In the past week alone, MET’s price has cratered 36%, but analysts warn that the fall could be far from over. The lawsuit accuses Chow and his affiliates of manipulating up to 15 tokens involving memes like “MELANIA” and “LIBRA,” each showing telltale “pump-and-dump” price patterns. Beyond the scandal’s legal dimensions, what makes Meteora’s implosion truly significant is that it exposes how much of DeFi’s token economy still depends on opaque allocation and insider favoritism. Investors had almost no visibility into the airdrop criteria, and founder-controlled wallets could be weaponized for self-enrichment. As investors rushed to exit, protocols like Orca and Raydium have been absorbing Meteora’s lost total value locked (TVL), increasing their market dominance across Solana’s DEX landscape. Capital flight from Meteora has accelerated, suggesting that users no longer view it as a safe liquidity hub. What we’re witnessing could spark a broader call for DeFi governance reform — especially as on-chain data reveals that founder-linked wallets in other projects are quietly cashing out during airdrop windows. The broader market implication is a crisis of trust. Transparent distribution now matters as much as yield performance. Projects that fail to show verifiable distribution logic face existential risk. Meteora didn’t just lose market share — it lost whatever remained of DeFi’s optimistic assumption that decentralization automatically equals honesty. Its collapse might be painful, but the reckoning it triggers may finally force the industry’s next evolution: accountability in protocol design. The Meteora Meltdown: How a $1.2 Million Airdrop Triggered a DeFi Reckoning was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story

The Meteora Meltdown: How a $1.2 Million Airdrop Triggered a DeFi Reckoning

2025/10/28 22:04

The DeFi world is reeling from the chaos surrounding Meteora and its disgraced founder Benjamin Chow. What began as a promising Solana-based liquidity protocol has erupted into scandal after revelations that the founder personally sent more than $1.2 million worth of MET airdrops to wallets connected to the Melania memecoin rugpull. These revelations surfaced just days before Chow was hit with an expansive U.S. class-action lawsuit accusing him of orchestrating multiple fraudulent schemes involving celebrity-themed tokens.

In the past week alone, MET’s price has cratered 36%, but analysts warn that the fall could be far from over. The lawsuit accuses Chow and his affiliates of manipulating up to 15 tokens involving memes like “MELANIA” and “LIBRA,” each showing telltale “pump-and-dump” price patterns. Beyond the scandal’s legal dimensions, what makes Meteora’s implosion truly significant is that it exposes how much of DeFi’s token economy still depends on opaque allocation and insider favoritism. Investors had almost no visibility into the airdrop criteria, and founder-controlled wallets could be weaponized for self-enrichment.

As investors rushed to exit, protocols like Orca and Raydium have been absorbing Meteora’s lost total value locked (TVL), increasing their market dominance across Solana’s DEX landscape. Capital flight from Meteora has accelerated, suggesting that users no longer view it as a safe liquidity hub. What we’re witnessing could spark a broader call for DeFi governance reform — especially as on-chain data reveals that founder-linked wallets in other projects are quietly cashing out during airdrop windows.

The broader market implication is a crisis of trust. Transparent distribution now matters as much as yield performance. Projects that fail to show verifiable distribution logic face existential risk. Meteora didn’t just lose market share — it lost whatever remained of DeFi’s optimistic assumption that decentralization automatically equals honesty. Its collapse might be painful, but the reckoning it triggers may finally force the industry’s next evolution: accountability in protocol design.


The Meteora Meltdown: How a $1.2 Million Airdrop Triggered a DeFi Reckoning was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.000393
$0.000393$0.000393
+0.25%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
What Is Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP)? Inside The Blockchain Network Built for Private Computation & Secure Data Sharing

What Is Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP)? Inside The Blockchain Network Built for Private Computation & Secure Data Sharing

Dive into Zero Knowledge Proof’s privacy-first blockchain, infrastructure, and presale auction system. Plus, see why analysts are calling it the best crypto to
Share
CoinLive2026/01/28 01:00
UNI Technical Analysis Jan 27

UNI Technical Analysis Jan 27

The post UNI Technical Analysis Jan 27 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. UNI is stabilizing around 4.69$ amid intraday fluctuations, with a short-term downtrend
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/28 01:26