The Bank of Korea (BOK) has published a report stating that private issuers of stablecoins do not have a sufficient level of trust to ensure the stability of the national currency in digital form. The regulator highlighted the risks of depreciation — the loss of the link between stablecoins and the underlying asset — and […] Сообщение South Korean Central Bank Urged Banks to Issue Stablecoins Instead of Private Companies появились сначала на INCRYPTED.The Bank of Korea (BOK) has published a report stating that private issuers of stablecoins do not have a sufficient level of trust to ensure the stability of the national currency in digital form. The regulator highlighted the risks of depreciation — the loss of the link between stablecoins and the underlying asset — and […] Сообщение South Korean Central Bank Urged Banks to Issue Stablecoins Instead of Private Companies появились сначала на INCRYPTED.

South Korean Central Bank Urged Banks to Issue Stablecoins Instead of Private Companies

  • The BOK has warned of the risks of stablecoins and called on banks to lead the introduction of digital currency.
  • The regulator called depreciation and loss of trust the main factors in favor of choosing traditional banks as stablecoin issuers.
  • The central bank also defined the conditions for launching the digital won.

The Bank of Korea (BOK) has published a report stating that private issuers of stablecoins do not have a sufficient level of trust to ensure the stability of the national currency in digital form.

The regulator highlighted the risks of depreciation — the loss of the link between stablecoins and the underlying asset — and suggested that traditional banks should play a key role in launching such products.

In the document, the central bank emphasized: “the currency does not function thanks to technology, but thanks to trust,” questioning the claim that blockchain alone can guarantee stability.

BOK recalled the collapse of the Terra/LUNA ecosystem, when “the algorithm that promised to maintain ‘1 coin = $1’ collapsed in a few days,” causing investors to lose money.

Analysts noted that even large stablecoins remain vulnerable: during the bankruptcy of Silicon Valley Bank in 2023, USDC fell to $0.88, and “many companies were forced to switch to crisis response mode.”

The risks are considered to be especially critical for stablecoins denominated in non-dollar currencies, even when it comes to currencies with a high reserve status, such as the euro.

The report stressed that technology must go hand in hand with regulatory soundness, as the “harmony of innovation and trust” is a key challenge in the digital currency market.

The BOK highlighted three main aspects:

  • The potential and role of stablecoins: stablecoins can expand financial infrastructure, but “trust in the instruments is critical”
  • Regulation and governance: “regulatory frameworks, security, reserves, and control mechanisms are important” to ensure that the 1:1 promise to the national currency is fulfilled
  • Integration with payment systems: in the “digital money era,” digital assets should work “alongside traditional finance,” not outside it

In September 2025, BDACS, in partnership with Woori Bank, launched the country’s first fully regulated stablecoin, KRW1. It operates on the Avalanche blockchain, which has been recognized by the government for its “reliability in public sector applications.”

The regulator noted the need for a high level of responsibility of issuers:

Therefore, the BOK proposes a phased implementation:

  • At the first stage, only banks will issue stablecoins
  • Gradual expansion to the private sector

This is in line with the development of government projects, including Project Hangang, a test of deposit tokens by banks on the central bank’s blockchain.

Political forces support this course, in particular, in July, the ruling and opposition parties of South Korea prepared alternative draft laws on regulating stablecoins.

At the same time, the Bank of Korea has recognized the strategic importance of stablecoins, but believes that:

  • Private issuers cannot guarantee stability
  • Successful stablecoins should be based on banking trust and strict regulation
  • Digital currency should be part of the national financial system, not an alternative to it

Earlier, we wrote that in South Korea, foreign tourists can withdraw cash from USDT via cryptomates.

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.05094
$0.05094$0.05094
+0.63%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
What Is Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP)? Inside The Blockchain Network Built for Private Computation & Secure Data Sharing

What Is Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP)? Inside The Blockchain Network Built for Private Computation & Secure Data Sharing

Dive into Zero Knowledge Proof’s privacy-first blockchain, infrastructure, and presale auction system. Plus, see why analysts are calling it the best crypto to
Share
CoinLive2026/01/28 01:00
UNI Technical Analysis Jan 27

UNI Technical Analysis Jan 27

The post UNI Technical Analysis Jan 27 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. UNI is stabilizing around 4.69$ amid intraday fluctuations, with a short-term downtrend
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/28 01:26