China’s central bank escalated its warning on stablecoins and reiterated a hard line against domestic crypto activity on Monday, with Governor Pan Gongsheng arguing that the rise of privately issued “virtual currencies”—particularly stablecoins—exposes gaps in global financial oversight and increases systemic fragility. Speaking at the opening of the 2025 Financial Street Forum in Beijing on […]China’s central bank escalated its warning on stablecoins and reiterated a hard line against domestic crypto activity on Monday, with Governor Pan Gongsheng arguing that the rise of privately issued “virtual currencies”—particularly stablecoins—exposes gaps in global financial oversight and increases systemic fragility. Speaking at the opening of the 2025 Financial Street Forum in Beijing on […]

Chinese Central Bank Warns Of Crypto Loopholes In Global Regulation

China’s central bank escalated its warning on stablecoins and reiterated a hard line against domestic crypto activity on Monday, with Governor Pan Gongsheng arguing that the rise of privately issued “virtual currencies”—particularly stablecoins—exposes gaps in global financial oversight and increases systemic fragility. Speaking at the opening of the 2025 Financial Street Forum in Beijing on October 27, Pan said stablecoins are still “at an early stage” but are already amplifying regulatory blind spots across borders and posing challenges to monetary sovereignty in weaker economies.

China Reaffirms Crypto Crackdown

Pan anchored his remarks in the policy debates that dominated the IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings held in Washington 10 days earlier, telling attendees that the prevailing view among finance ministers and central bank governors was that stablecoins, “as a financial activity, at this stage cannot effectively meet basic requirements in customer identification and anti-money-laundering,” thereby “magnifying loopholes in global financial regulation,” fueling “speculative hype,” increasing “the fragility of the global financial system,” and “impacting the monetary sovereignty of some underdeveloped economies.”

The governor coupled that assessment with a firm domestic enforcement posture: “Since 2017, the People’s Bank of China, together with relevant departments, has issued multiple policy documents to prevent and deal with risks from domestic crypto trading and speculation, and these documents remain effective. Next, the PBOC will work with law-enforcement authorities to continue cracking down on the operation and speculation of cryptocurrencies within China, maintain economic and financial order, and closely track and dynamically evaluate the development of offshore stablecoins.”

His statement effectively reaffirms the legal status quo—comprehensive restrictions on crypto trading and mining within China’s borders—while signaling ongoing surveillance of offshore instruments that touch Chinese users and firms.

Pan’s comments land at a moment when stablecoins have become embedded in cross-border commerce and crypto market plumbing, with dollar-pegged tokens dominating global volumes. They also intersect with a live policy debate inside China about whether and how to tolerate offshore, yuan-linked instruments to complement the official e-CNY.

Over the summer, major Chinese tech groups lobbied the PBOC to authorize an offshore, yuan-based stablecoin in Hong Kong to counter US dollar stablecoin dominance—an initiative that, if ever approved, would likely be ring-fenced from the mainland’s prohibitions.

For market participants, the signal is twofold. First, there is no domestic policy thaw for crypto trading or mining: the 2017–2021 crackdown architecture remains intact, and enforcement will be coordinated with police and other agencies.

Second, Chinese authorities are sharpening their scrutiny of offshore stablecoins used by exporters, importers, and savers, a vector that has grown as stablecoins have become de facto settlement media in parts of Asia and emerging markets. The central bank’s language—“continue cracking down” at home while “dynamically evaluating” offshore developments—suggests that any future experimentation will occur through official government channels rather than market-driven stablecoin adoption.

At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $3.84 trillion.

Total crypto market cap
Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.05335
$0.05335$0.05335
+1.91%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

The post QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. QNT’s MACD histogram showing a positive trend and RSI stabilizing in the neutral zone
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/21 23:54
SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

The post SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shiba Inu is forming a death cross
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 00:26