The post Why does Solana’s co-founder believe Ethereum’s L2 model is ‘fundamentally broken?’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Are Ethereum’s layer-2 networks truly secure? Vitalik Buterin says yes, but Anatoly Yakovenko warns L2s still face major security risks. How much value do top Ethereum L2s hold? Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, and Worldchain together secure over $35 billion in total value locked. Ethereum’s [ETH] layer-2 networks are under scrutiny after a public clash between Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin and Solana’s [SOL] Anatoly Yakovenko. The debate is on security; while L2s are meant to inherit Ethereum’s protection, some argue they bring new risks. The dispute has caused discussion among developers and investors about whether these scaling solutions are as safe as promised. Buterin’s confidence in Ethereum’s L2 security AMBCrypto previously reported on Vitalik Buterin’s confidence in the security model of Ethereum’s layer-2 networks. He argued that L2s remain protected from 51% attacks since they inherit Ethereum’s base-layer finality. However, Buterin cautioned that risks emerge when validator sets take on functions outside Ethereum’s direct control, which could undermine those guarantees. Source: X His comments come as top L2s hold over $35 billion in TVL, supported by Ethereum’s more than one million validators. Yakovenko challenges the narrative There was one loud opposing view, though. Solana’s Anatoly Yakovenko dismissed Buterin’s claims as “erroneous,” arguing that after years of development, L2s still face the same worst-case risks as cross-chain bridges like Wormhole. Source: X He pointed out three main flaws in current L2 designs: complex code that increases attack risk, multi-signature custody that can move funds without user approval, and off-chain processing that centralizes control. In fact, he also suggested building a special bridge to make Ethereum a layer-2 for Solana, improving interoperability and addressing what he sees as L2s’ lingering security issues. Source: X Further, an Ethereum supporter disagreed with Yakovenko, saying there’s “nothing fundamental” stopping L2s from inheriting Ethereum’s security. They also… The post Why does Solana’s co-founder believe Ethereum’s L2 model is ‘fundamentally broken?’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Are Ethereum’s layer-2 networks truly secure? Vitalik Buterin says yes, but Anatoly Yakovenko warns L2s still face major security risks. How much value do top Ethereum L2s hold? Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, and Worldchain together secure over $35 billion in total value locked. Ethereum’s [ETH] layer-2 networks are under scrutiny after a public clash between Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin and Solana’s [SOL] Anatoly Yakovenko. The debate is on security; while L2s are meant to inherit Ethereum’s protection, some argue they bring new risks. The dispute has caused discussion among developers and investors about whether these scaling solutions are as safe as promised. Buterin’s confidence in Ethereum’s L2 security AMBCrypto previously reported on Vitalik Buterin’s confidence in the security model of Ethereum’s layer-2 networks. He argued that L2s remain protected from 51% attacks since they inherit Ethereum’s base-layer finality. However, Buterin cautioned that risks emerge when validator sets take on functions outside Ethereum’s direct control, which could undermine those guarantees. Source: X His comments come as top L2s hold over $35 billion in TVL, supported by Ethereum’s more than one million validators. Yakovenko challenges the narrative There was one loud opposing view, though. Solana’s Anatoly Yakovenko dismissed Buterin’s claims as “erroneous,” arguing that after years of development, L2s still face the same worst-case risks as cross-chain bridges like Wormhole. Source: X He pointed out three main flaws in current L2 designs: complex code that increases attack risk, multi-signature custody that can move funds without user approval, and off-chain processing that centralizes control. In fact, he also suggested building a special bridge to make Ethereum a layer-2 for Solana, improving interoperability and addressing what he sees as L2s’ lingering security issues. Source: X Further, an Ethereum supporter disagreed with Yakovenko, saying there’s “nothing fundamental” stopping L2s from inheriting Ethereum’s security. They also…

Why does Solana’s co-founder believe Ethereum’s L2 model is ‘fundamentally broken?’

Key Takeaways

Are Ethereum’s layer-2 networks truly secure?

Vitalik Buterin says yes, but Anatoly Yakovenko warns L2s still face major security risks.

How much value do top Ethereum L2s hold?

Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, and Worldchain together secure over $35 billion in total value locked.


Ethereum’s [ETH] layer-2 networks are under scrutiny after a public clash between Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin and Solana’s [SOL] Anatoly Yakovenko.

The debate is on security; while L2s are meant to inherit Ethereum’s protection, some argue they bring new risks. The dispute has caused discussion among developers and investors about whether these scaling solutions are as safe as promised.

Buterin’s confidence in Ethereum’s L2 security

AMBCrypto previously reported on Vitalik Buterin’s confidence in the security model of Ethereum’s layer-2 networks.

He argued that L2s remain protected from 51% attacks since they inherit Ethereum’s base-layer finality. However, Buterin cautioned that risks emerge when validator sets take on functions outside Ethereum’s direct control, which could undermine those guarantees.

Source: X

His comments come as top L2s hold over $35 billion in TVL, supported by Ethereum’s more than one million validators.

Yakovenko challenges the narrative

There was one loud opposing view, though.

Solana’s Anatoly Yakovenko dismissed Buterin’s claims as “erroneous,” arguing that after years of development, L2s still face the same worst-case risks as cross-chain bridges like Wormhole.

Source: X

He pointed out three main flaws in current L2 designs: complex code that increases attack risk, multi-signature custody that can move funds without user approval, and off-chain processing that centralizes control.

In fact, he also suggested building a special bridge to make Ethereum a layer-2 for Solana, improving interoperability and addressing what he sees as L2s’ lingering security issues.

Source: X

Further, an Ethereum supporter disagreed with Yakovenko, saying there’s “nothing fundamental” stopping L2s from inheriting Ethereum’s security. They also argued that Stage 2 L2s already act like vault contracts with full L1 protection and that Yakovenko’s criticism ignores ongoing upgrades.

Yakovenko pushed back, insisting there is something “fundamental” that still makes it hard for L2s to reach full security.

A challenge, he said, that remains unsolved even after five years.

ETH v SOL: The year gone by

Over the past year, Ethereum and Solana have shown similar price trends, rising and falling almost in sync. Ethereum gained about 15.45%, while Solana climbed 7.39%.

Source: TradingView

Both saw strong rallies mid-year before cooling off in September, then slowly recovered into late October.

At press time, Ethereum held just a slight lead.

Next: Pump.fun rallies 10% – Traders, more upside ahead IF…

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/why-does-solanas-co-founder-believe-ethereums-l2-model-is-fundamentally-broken/

Market Opportunity
Believe Logo
Believe Price(BELIEVE)
$0.006563
$0.006563$0.006563
+0.39%
USD
Believe (BELIEVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50