Author: Haotian I saw a picture this morning and it gave me some thoughts to share: 1) Choosing a TGE in a time window with abundant liquidity is very important, so important that it can ignore the fundamentals of the project. For example, $Pengu, an NFT community MEME token, was launched on December 17 last year when liquidity was very abundant, but its performance was better than most projects. $BABY and $HUMA, which are projects with technical narratives and VC layout endorsements, were launched in April and May of this year when liquidity was relatively exhausted, and their performance was very poor. 2) Projects tend to go online in large groups, but it is necessary to consider whether market liquidity can sustain them. For example, in November and December of last year, projects like Hyperliquid, Movement, Pengu, and Morpho emerged. Despite the mixed performance, most of them eventually withdrew. Meanwhile, in April and May of this year, Babylon, Initia, Zora, Huma, and Sophon all emerged in large numbers, but they all suffered from insufficient liquidity and underperforming. 3) During the TGE time window, there may also be some projects that reach their peak as soon as they launch. Some projects take advantage of ample market liquidity and retail investor Fomo (likely a term or market capitalization) to launch their TGEs, ignoring their own weak fundamentals. For example, Dongxiang and Berachain both saw strong Fomo enthusiasm at their openings, only to see their stock prices plummet. This simply demonstrates that market liquidity dividends, when not backed by fundamentals, can actually accelerate the decline of some projects. 4) In the wrong TGE time window, for some projects that have panic in fundamentals but are psychologically viable, it is actually a golden opportunity to discover value. $ZORA is a prime example, launching during the darkest market and most illiquid times, becoming the sole winner among its group of projects. Similar was the earlier $Virtual, which launched during the darkest times of the year, yet consistently delivered exceptional fundamental performance, leading to waves of Solana AI agent enthusiasm and ultimately allowing its collective believers to prevail. 5) Regardless of the strength or weakness of the exit window, there will always be projects with excellent fundamentals that emerge in the end. For example, Hyperliquid was able to build a large community of supporters, leading a wave of Perp Dex narrative craze, and the price of $HYPE also climbed step by step; @flock_io Furthermore, despite launching at the height of last year's Trump's massive liquidity grab, with $FLOCK's minimum circulating market capitalization plummeting to an exaggerated 3 million, $FLOCK achieved a near-exchange listing grand slam thanks to its outstanding fundamentals, ensuring its believers prevailed in the end. For most retail investors, understanding the importance of the TGE window and adopting differentiated strategies: chasing highs and entering and exiting quickly during strong TGEs; focusing on investment research during weak TGEs, identifying undervalued, high-quality indices, and holding them for the long term—all have the potential to ultimately emerge as winners, albeit with some difficulty.Author: Haotian I saw a picture this morning and it gave me some thoughts to share: 1) Choosing a TGE in a time window with abundant liquidity is very important, so important that it can ignore the fundamentals of the project. For example, $Pengu, an NFT community MEME token, was launched on December 17 last year when liquidity was very abundant, but its performance was better than most projects. $BABY and $HUMA, which are projects with technical narratives and VC layout endorsements, were launched in April and May of this year when liquidity was relatively exhausted, and their performance was very poor. 2) Projects tend to go online in large groups, but it is necessary to consider whether market liquidity can sustain them. For example, in November and December of last year, projects like Hyperliquid, Movement, Pengu, and Morpho emerged. Despite the mixed performance, most of them eventually withdrew. Meanwhile, in April and May of this year, Babylon, Initia, Zora, Huma, and Sophon all emerged in large numbers, but they all suffered from insufficient liquidity and underperforming. 3) During the TGE time window, there may also be some projects that reach their peak as soon as they launch. Some projects take advantage of ample market liquidity and retail investor Fomo (likely a term or market capitalization) to launch their TGEs, ignoring their own weak fundamentals. For example, Dongxiang and Berachain both saw strong Fomo enthusiasm at their openings, only to see their stock prices plummet. This simply demonstrates that market liquidity dividends, when not backed by fundamentals, can actually accelerate the decline of some projects. 4) In the wrong TGE time window, for some projects that have panic in fundamentals but are psychologically viable, it is actually a golden opportunity to discover value. $ZORA is a prime example, launching during the darkest market and most illiquid times, becoming the sole winner among its group of projects. Similar was the earlier $Virtual, which launched during the darkest times of the year, yet consistently delivered exceptional fundamental performance, leading to waves of Solana AI agent enthusiasm and ultimately allowing its collective believers to prevail. 5) Regardless of the strength or weakness of the exit window, there will always be projects with excellent fundamentals that emerge in the end. For example, Hyperliquid was able to build a large community of supporters, leading a wave of Perp Dex narrative craze, and the price of $HYPE also climbed step by step; @flock_io Furthermore, despite launching at the height of last year's Trump's massive liquidity grab, with $FLOCK's minimum circulating market capitalization plummeting to an exaggerated 3 million, $FLOCK achieved a near-exchange listing grand slam thanks to its outstanding fundamentals, ensuring its believers prevailed in the end. For most retail investors, understanding the importance of the TGE window and adopting differentiated strategies: chasing highs and entering and exiting quickly during strong TGEs; focusing on investment research during weak TGEs, identifying undervalued, high-quality indices, and holding them for the long term—all have the potential to ultimately emerge as winners, albeit with some difficulty.

Why is the timing of TGE so important?

2025/10/22 20:00
3 min read

Author: Haotian

I saw a picture this morning and it gave me some thoughts to share:

1) Choosing a TGE in a time window with abundant liquidity is very important, so important that it can ignore the fundamentals of the project.

For example, $Pengu, an NFT community MEME token, was launched on December 17 last year when liquidity was very abundant, but its performance was better than most projects. $BABY and $HUMA, which are projects with technical narratives and VC layout endorsements, were launched in April and May of this year when liquidity was relatively exhausted, and their performance was very poor.

2) Projects tend to go online in large groups, but it is necessary to consider whether market liquidity can sustain them.

For example, in November and December of last year, projects like Hyperliquid, Movement, Pengu, and Morpho emerged. Despite the mixed performance, most of them eventually withdrew. Meanwhile, in April and May of this year, Babylon, Initia, Zora, Huma, and Sophon all emerged in large numbers, but they all suffered from insufficient liquidity and underperforming.

3) During the TGE time window, there may also be some projects that reach their peak as soon as they launch.

Some projects take advantage of ample market liquidity and retail investor Fomo (likely a term or market capitalization) to launch their TGEs, ignoring their own weak fundamentals. For example, Dongxiang and Berachain both saw strong Fomo enthusiasm at their openings, only to see their stock prices plummet. This simply demonstrates that market liquidity dividends, when not backed by fundamentals, can actually accelerate the decline of some projects.

4) In the wrong TGE time window, for some projects that have panic in fundamentals but are psychologically viable, it is actually a golden opportunity to discover value.

$ZORA is a prime example, launching during the darkest market and most illiquid times, becoming the sole winner among its group of projects. Similar was the earlier $Virtual, which launched during the darkest times of the year, yet consistently delivered exceptional fundamental performance, leading to waves of Solana AI agent enthusiasm and ultimately allowing its collective believers to prevail.

5) Regardless of the strength or weakness of the exit window, there will always be projects with excellent fundamentals that emerge in the end.

For example, Hyperliquid was able to build a large community of supporters, leading a wave of Perp Dex narrative craze, and the price of $HYPE also climbed step by step; @flock_io

Furthermore, despite launching at the height of last year's Trump's massive liquidity grab, with $FLOCK's minimum circulating market capitalization plummeting to an exaggerated 3 million, $FLOCK achieved a near-exchange listing grand slam thanks to its outstanding fundamentals, ensuring its believers prevailed in the end. For most retail investors, understanding the importance of the TGE window and adopting differentiated strategies: chasing highs and entering and exiting quickly during strong TGEs; focusing on investment research during weak TGEs, identifying undervalued, high-quality indices, and holding them for the long term—all have the potential to ultimately emerge as winners, albeit with some difficulty.

Market Opportunity
ME Logo
ME Price(ME)
$0,1372
$0,1372$0,1372
+2,54%
USD
ME (ME) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Unlocking Institutional OTC Trading For Tokenized Gold

Unlocking Institutional OTC Trading For Tokenized Gold

The post Unlocking Institutional OTC Trading For Tokenized Gold appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Wintermute’s Strategic Masterstroke: Unlocking Institutional
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/17 04:50
Solana’s (SOL) Recent Rally May Impress, But Investors Targeting Life-Changing ROI Are Looking Elsewhere

Solana’s (SOL) Recent Rally May Impress, But Investors Targeting Life-Changing ROI Are Looking Elsewhere

The post Solana’s (SOL) Recent Rally May Impress, But Investors Targeting Life-Changing ROI Are Looking Elsewhere appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Solana’s (SOL) latest rally has attracted investors from all over, but the bigger story for vision-minded investors is where the next surges of life-altering returns are heading.  As Solana continues to see high levels of ecosystem usage and network utilization, the stage is slowly being set for Mutuum Finance (MUTM).  MUTM is priced at $0.035 in its fast-growing presale. Price appreciation of 14.3% is what the investors are going to anticipate in the next phase. Over $15.85 million has been raised as the presale keeps gaining momentum. Unlike the majority of the tokens surfing short-term waves of hype, Mutuum Finance is becoming a utility-focused choice with more value potential and therefore an increasingly better option for investors looking for more than price action alone. Solana Maintains Gains Near $234 As Speculation Persists Solana (SOL) is trading at $234.08 currently, holding its 24hr range around $234.42 to $248.19 as it illustrates the recent trend. The token has recorded strong seven-day gains of nearly 13%, far exceeding most of its peers, as it is supported by rising volume and institutional buying. Resistance is at $250-$260, and support appears to be at $220-$230, and thus these are significant levels for potential breakout or pullback.  However, new DeFi crypto Mutuum Finance, is being considered by market watchers to have more upside potential, being still in presale.  Mutuum Finance Phase 6 Presale Mutuum Finance is currently in Presale Stage 6 and offering tokens for $0.035. Presale has been going on very fast, and investors have raised over $15.85 million. The project also looks forward to a USD-pegged stablecoin on the Ethereum blockchain for convenient payments and as a keeper of long-term value. Mutuum Finance is a dual-lending, multi-purpose DeFi platform that benefits borrowers and lenders alike. It provides the network to retail as well as…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 06:23
Hidden Gem Presales for 2026: IPO Genie Unlocks 1000x Private Market Gains

Hidden Gem Presales for 2026: IPO Genie Unlocks 1000x Private Market Gains

16th February 2026: Gone are the Wild West days when tokens launched on hype alone. Today, investors want projects that […] The post Hidden Gem Presales for 2026
Share
Coindoo2026/02/17 05:01