Buy Crypto Markets Spot FuturesOIL(WTI)Earn Event Center

Polygon co-founder Sandeep Nailwal publicly questioned his loyalty to Ethereum after years of contributing to the ecosystem without receiving support from the Ethereum Foundation or community. His criticism came alongside revelations that former Geth lead developer Péter Szilágyi earned just $625,000 over six years working on Ethereum’s $480 billion network. The controversy intensified as Solana co-founder Raj Gokal openly suggested collaboration with Nailwal, while multiple developers criticized the Foundation’s treasury management and talent retention strategies. Polygon Founder Questions Ecosystem Loyalty Nailwal stated that he “started questioning [his] loyalty toward Ethereum,” despite building infrastructure that scaled the network and hosting successful applications, such as Polymarket. He noted that “I/we never got any direct support from the EF or the Ethereum CT community — in fact, the reverse,” while maintaining moral loyalty that potentially cost “billions of dollars in Polygon’s valuation.” The Ethereum community refuses to classify Polygon PoS as a layer-2, despite its ecosystem including true L2s like Katana and XLayer, which creates market perception issues as competitors like Hedera Hashgraph achieve higher valuations. Marc Boiron, CEO of Polygon Labs, emphasized that “Polygon PoS is a customer of Ethereum” that pays significant fees to the network, arguing the Foundation should “embrace” rather than “shun” contributors. Nailwal referenced friends suggesting that Polygon declare itself an L1, noting that the chain would likely achieve a two- to five-times higher valuation with such repositioning. He promised “a final push that might just revive the entire L2 narrative” in the coming weeks, while acknowledging that Ethereum operates as a democracy where “people on all sides end up disgruntled.“ Developer Compensation Crisis Exposes Foundation Mismanagement Szilágyi revealed in a May 2024 letter to Foundation leadership that his total compensation for six years managing Ethereum’s primary execution client was $625,000 before taxes, with zero benefits, raises, or incentives. He described working at the Foundation as “a bad financial decision“. He warned that the situation creates “a perfect breeding ground for perverse incentives, conflicts of interests and eventual protocol capture.” The former developer paraphrased Vitalik Buterin’s compensation philosophy as “if someone’s not complaining that they are paid too little, then they are paid too much.“ Back in September, Protocol Guild data revealed that Ethereum core developers earn 50% to 60% below market standards, with a median base pay of $140,000 compared to average market offers of $359,000. One developer reported declining a $700,000 package to continue core work. Only 37% of contributors receive equity or token grants from employers, unlike commercial crypto ventures, which often offer significant upside packages. Community responses highlighted that the Foundation recently sold 10,000 ETH worth $43 million while maintaining insufficient developer compensation. Critics across crypto Twitter questioned where Foundation funds are directed, with some noting a grant abuse issue where projects receive over $200,000 for minimal work, while core developers remain underpaid. The Foundation holds a massive ETH treasury without implementing treasury management or even staking its holdings. Ecosystem Builders Migrate Vitalik Buterin responded to Nailwal’s criticism with appreciation for Polygon’s contributions. He highlighted the platform’s role in hosting Polymarket and advancing ZK-EVM technology through early investments in Jordi Baylina’s team. Buterin noted Polygon’s “immensely valuable role in the ethereum ecosystem” and praised Nailwal’s personal efforts, including $190 million voluntarily returned from donated SHIB tokens that funded Balvi’s open-source biotech program. He suggested that Polygon could adopt off-the-shelf ZK technology, which has improved dramatically, with proving costs now around $0.0001 per transaction. Brendan Farmer from Polygon Zero countered that “every zkVM running in prod” except RiscZero runs on Polygon Zero’s technology, including Succinct Labs and Brevis. He argued Polygon’s Plonky2 release was over 100 times faster than existing solutions from StarkWare, crediting the company for open-sourcing the work as a public good. Farmer noted that the $0.0001 per transaction figures may be misleading when considering the actual costs of proving high-throughput chains that require over-provisioned resources. One development team shared that after four years of building on Ethereum and Base without success, they moved to Solana six months ago and generated $3.5 million in revenue within 48 hours of their launch. They described the Base and Ethereum ecosystems as “closed dinner parties” with inner-circle dynamics, while Solana provides open, builder-first support regardless of project type. In a related development, the Foundation has begun decommissioning the Holesky testnet this week, following the completion of Fusaka-related testing, with node operators scheduled to shut down their infrastructure over the next ten daysPolygon co-founder Sandeep Nailwal publicly questioned his loyalty to Ethereum after years of contributing to the ecosystem without receiving support from the Ethereum Foundation or community. His criticism came alongside revelations that former Geth lead developer Péter Szilágyi earned just $625,000 over six years working on Ethereum’s $480 billion network. The controversy intensified as Solana co-founder Raj Gokal openly suggested collaboration with Nailwal, while multiple developers criticized the Foundation’s treasury management and talent retention strategies. Polygon Founder Questions Ecosystem Loyalty Nailwal stated that he “started questioning [his] loyalty toward Ethereum,” despite building infrastructure that scaled the network and hosting successful applications, such as Polymarket. He noted that “I/we never got any direct support from the EF or the Ethereum CT community — in fact, the reverse,” while maintaining moral loyalty that potentially cost “billions of dollars in Polygon’s valuation.” The Ethereum community refuses to classify Polygon PoS as a layer-2, despite its ecosystem including true L2s like Katana and XLayer, which creates market perception issues as competitors like Hedera Hashgraph achieve higher valuations. Marc Boiron, CEO of Polygon Labs, emphasized that “Polygon PoS is a customer of Ethereum” that pays significant fees to the network, arguing the Foundation should “embrace” rather than “shun” contributors. Nailwal referenced friends suggesting that Polygon declare itself an L1, noting that the chain would likely achieve a two- to five-times higher valuation with such repositioning. He promised “a final push that might just revive the entire L2 narrative” in the coming weeks, while acknowledging that Ethereum operates as a democracy where “people on all sides end up disgruntled.“ Developer Compensation Crisis Exposes Foundation Mismanagement Szilágyi revealed in a May 2024 letter to Foundation leadership that his total compensation for six years managing Ethereum’s primary execution client was $625,000 before taxes, with zero benefits, raises, or incentives. He described working at the Foundation as “a bad financial decision“. He warned that the situation creates “a perfect breeding ground for perverse incentives, conflicts of interests and eventual protocol capture.” The former developer paraphrased Vitalik Buterin’s compensation philosophy as “if someone’s not complaining that they are paid too little, then they are paid too much.“ Back in September, Protocol Guild data revealed that Ethereum core developers earn 50% to 60% below market standards, with a median base pay of $140,000 compared to average market offers of $359,000. One developer reported declining a $700,000 package to continue core work. Only 37% of contributors receive equity or token grants from employers, unlike commercial crypto ventures, which often offer significant upside packages. Community responses highlighted that the Foundation recently sold 10,000 ETH worth $43 million while maintaining insufficient developer compensation. Critics across crypto Twitter questioned where Foundation funds are directed, with some noting a grant abuse issue where projects receive over $200,000 for minimal work, while core developers remain underpaid. The Foundation holds a massive ETH treasury without implementing treasury management or even staking its holdings. Ecosystem Builders Migrate Vitalik Buterin responded to Nailwal’s criticism with appreciation for Polygon’s contributions. He highlighted the platform’s role in hosting Polymarket and advancing ZK-EVM technology through early investments in Jordi Baylina’s team. Buterin noted Polygon’s “immensely valuable role in the ethereum ecosystem” and praised Nailwal’s personal efforts, including $190 million voluntarily returned from donated SHIB tokens that funded Balvi’s open-source biotech program. He suggested that Polygon could adopt off-the-shelf ZK technology, which has improved dramatically, with proving costs now around $0.0001 per transaction. Brendan Farmer from Polygon Zero countered that “every zkVM running in prod” except RiscZero runs on Polygon Zero’s technology, including Succinct Labs and Brevis. He argued Polygon’s Plonky2 release was over 100 times faster than existing solutions from StarkWare, crediting the company for open-sourcing the work as a public good. Farmer noted that the $0.0001 per transaction figures may be misleading when considering the actual costs of proving high-throughput chains that require over-provisioned resources. One development team shared that after four years of building on Ethereum and Base without success, they moved to Solana six months ago and generated $3.5 million in revenue within 48 hours of their launch. They described the Base and Ethereum ecosystems as “closed dinner parties” with inner-circle dynamics, while Solana provides open, builder-first support regardless of project type. In a related development, the Foundation has begun decommissioning the Holesky testnet this week, following the completion of Fusaka-related testing, with node operators scheduled to shut down their infrastructure over the next ten days

‘We Scaled Ethereum, Got Zero Help’ – Polygon and Sonic Labs Slam Ethereum Foundation

Author: CryptoNews

Source: CryptoNews

2025/10/21 16:53

4 min read

SONIC$0.04318+0.39%

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Polygon co-founder Sandeep Nailwal publicly questioned his loyalty to Ethereum after years of contributing to the ecosystem without receiving support from the Ethereum Foundation or community.

His criticism came alongside revelations that former Geth lead developer Péter Szilágyi earned just $625,000 over six years working on Ethereum’s $480 billion network.

The controversy intensified as Solana co-founder Raj Gokal openly suggested collaboration with Nailwal, while multiple developers criticized the Foundation’s treasury management and talent retention strategies.

Polygon Founder Questions Ecosystem Loyalty

Nailwal stated that he “started questioning [his] loyalty toward Ethereum,” despite building infrastructure that scaled the network and hosting successful applications, such as Polymarket.

He noted that “I/we never got any direct support from the EF or the Ethereum CT community — in fact, the reverse,” while maintaining moral loyalty that potentially cost “billions of dollars in Polygon’s valuation.”

The Ethereum community refuses to classify Polygon PoS as a layer-2, despite its ecosystem including true L2s like Katana and XLayer, which creates market perception issues as competitors like Hedera Hashgraph achieve higher valuations.

Marc Boiron, CEO of Polygon Labs, emphasized that “Polygon PoS is a customer of Ethereum” that pays significant fees to the network, arguing the Foundation should “embrace” rather than “shun” contributors.

Nailwal referenced friends suggesting that Polygon declare itself an L1, noting that the chain would likely achieve a two- to five-times higher valuation with such repositioning.

He promised “a final push that might just revive the entire L2 narrative” in the coming weeks, while acknowledging that Ethereum operates as a democracy where “people on all sides end up disgruntled.“

Developer Compensation Crisis Exposes Foundation Mismanagement

Szilágyi revealed in a May 2024 letter to Foundation leadership that his total compensation for six years managing Ethereum’s primary execution client was $625,000 before taxes, with zero benefits, raises, or incentives.

He described working at the Foundation as “a bad financial decision“. He warned that the situation creates “a perfect breeding ground for perverse incentives, conflicts of interests and eventual protocol capture.”

The former developer paraphrased Vitalik Buterin’s compensation philosophy as “if someone’s not complaining that they are paid too little, then they are paid too much.“

Back in September, Protocol Guild data revealed that Ethereum core developers earn 50% to 60% below market standards, with a median base pay of $140,000 compared to average market offers of $359,000.

One developer reported declining a $700,000 package to continue core work.

Only 37% of contributors receive equity or token grants from employers, unlike commercial crypto ventures, which often offer significant upside packages.

Community responses highlighted that the Foundation recently sold 10,000 ETH worth $43 million while maintaining insufficient developer compensation.

Critics across crypto Twitter questioned where Foundation funds are directed, with some noting a grant abuse issue where projects receive over $200,000 for minimal work, while core developers remain underpaid.

The Foundation holds a massive ETH treasury without implementing treasury management or even staking its holdings.

Ecosystem Builders Migrate

Vitalik Buterin responded to Nailwal’s criticism with appreciation for Polygon’s contributions.

He highlighted the platform’s role in hosting Polymarket and advancing ZK-EVM technology through early investments in Jordi Baylina’s team.

Buterin noted Polygon’s “immensely valuable role in the ethereum ecosystem” and praised Nailwal’s personal efforts, including $190 million voluntarily returned from donated SHIB tokens that funded Balvi’s open-source biotech program.

He suggested that Polygon could adopt off-the-shelf ZK technology, which has improved dramatically, with proving costs now around $0.0001 per transaction.

Brendan Farmer from Polygon Zero countered that “every zkVM running in prod” except RiscZero runs on Polygon Zero’s technology, including Succinct Labs and Brevis.

He argued Polygon’s Plonky2 release was over 100 times faster than existing solutions from StarkWare, crediting the company for open-sourcing the work as a public good.

Farmer noted that the $0.0001 per transaction figures may be misleading when considering the actual costs of proving high-throughput chains that require over-provisioned resources.

One development team shared that after four years of building on Ethereum and Base without success, they moved to Solana six months ago and generated $3.5 million in revenue within 48 hours of their launch.

They described the Base and Ethereum ecosystems as “closed dinner parties” with inner-circle dynamics, while Solana provides open, builder-first support regardless of project type.

In a related development, the Foundation has begun decommissioning the Holesky testnet this week, following the completion of Fusaka-related testing, with node operators scheduled to shut down their infrastructure over the next ten days.

Market Opportunity

Sonic SVM Price(SONIC)

$0.04318

$0.04318$0.04318

-0.02%

USD

Sonic SVM (SONIC) Live Price Chart

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.