The post Bitcoin News: Analysts Say the Four-Year Cycle Is Dead appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin The cryptocurrency market is still reeling after last Friday’s historic $19 billion liquidation wave, one of the largest sell-offs ever recorded, following President Donald Trump’s warning of new tariffs on Chinese imports. The event not only erased billions in trader positions but also reignited debate over one of Bitcoin’s oldest price theories – the so-called four-year halving cycle. For more than a decade, the halving cycle has served as the market’s compass, predicting that Bitcoin tends to peak a year after its mining rewards are reduced, before crashing into a bear market. Yet, analysts now argue that this framework no longer explains modern market behavior. Institutional money, derivatives, and ETF flows have introduced dynamics that the old models never accounted for. According to Messari’s Matthew Nay, many traders are stuck in the past. “Some investors are still anchored to the four-year narrative,” he said, adding that geopolitical uncertainty and the re-emergence of trade tensions have distorted expectations. “They’re defending short positions not because of the cycle – but because the market feels fundamentally different now.” Others agree that the halving effect has faded as new forces shape Bitcoin’s trajectory. Jonathan Morgan of Stocktwits pointed out that much of the recent selling wasn’t emotional but “mechanical,” driven by automated trading and outdated retail habits. “People still follow the old playbook – buy before the halving, dump if it doesn’t bounce,” he said. Jasper De Maere of Wintermute added that miners now have a negligible influence: “Their rewards used to set the rhythm of the market. Today, that share is minuscule compared to institutional volume.” Still, not all analysts are ready to bury the halving theory entirely. Nay suggested that Bitcoin could still surprise the market with a fresh all-time high before the year ends, showing that cyclical behavior may evolve… The post Bitcoin News: Analysts Say the Four-Year Cycle Is Dead appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin The cryptocurrency market is still reeling after last Friday’s historic $19 billion liquidation wave, one of the largest sell-offs ever recorded, following President Donald Trump’s warning of new tariffs on Chinese imports. The event not only erased billions in trader positions but also reignited debate over one of Bitcoin’s oldest price theories – the so-called four-year halving cycle. For more than a decade, the halving cycle has served as the market’s compass, predicting that Bitcoin tends to peak a year after its mining rewards are reduced, before crashing into a bear market. Yet, analysts now argue that this framework no longer explains modern market behavior. Institutional money, derivatives, and ETF flows have introduced dynamics that the old models never accounted for. According to Messari’s Matthew Nay, many traders are stuck in the past. “Some investors are still anchored to the four-year narrative,” he said, adding that geopolitical uncertainty and the re-emergence of trade tensions have distorted expectations. “They’re defending short positions not because of the cycle – but because the market feels fundamentally different now.” Others agree that the halving effect has faded as new forces shape Bitcoin’s trajectory. Jonathan Morgan of Stocktwits pointed out that much of the recent selling wasn’t emotional but “mechanical,” driven by automated trading and outdated retail habits. “People still follow the old playbook – buy before the halving, dump if it doesn’t bounce,” he said. Jasper De Maere of Wintermute added that miners now have a negligible influence: “Their rewards used to set the rhythm of the market. Today, that share is minuscule compared to institutional volume.” Still, not all analysts are ready to bury the halving theory entirely. Nay suggested that Bitcoin could still surprise the market with a fresh all-time high before the year ends, showing that cyclical behavior may evolve…

Bitcoin News: Analysts Say the Four-Year Cycle Is Dead

Bitcoin

The cryptocurrency market is still reeling after last Friday’s historic $19 billion liquidation wave, one of the largest sell-offs ever recorded, following President Donald Trump’s warning of new tariffs on Chinese imports.

The event not only erased billions in trader positions but also reignited debate over one of Bitcoin’s oldest price theories – the so-called four-year halving cycle.

For more than a decade, the halving cycle has served as the market’s compass, predicting that Bitcoin tends to peak a year after its mining rewards are reduced, before crashing into a bear market. Yet, analysts now argue that this framework no longer explains modern market behavior. Institutional money, derivatives, and ETF flows have introduced dynamics that the old models never accounted for.

According to Messari’s Matthew Nay, many traders are stuck in the past. “Some investors are still anchored to the four-year narrative,” he said, adding that geopolitical uncertainty and the re-emergence of trade tensions have distorted expectations. “They’re defending short positions not because of the cycle – but because the market feels fundamentally different now.”

Others agree that the halving effect has faded as new forces shape Bitcoin’s trajectory. Jonathan Morgan of Stocktwits pointed out that much of the recent selling wasn’t emotional but “mechanical,” driven by automated trading and outdated retail habits. “People still follow the old playbook – buy before the halving, dump if it doesn’t bounce,” he said. Jasper De Maere of Wintermute added that miners now have a negligible influence: “Their rewards used to set the rhythm of the market. Today, that share is minuscule compared to institutional volume.”

Still, not all analysts are ready to bury the halving theory entirely. Nay suggested that Bitcoin could still surprise the market with a fresh all-time high before the year ends, showing that cyclical behavior may evolve rather than vanish. Morgan agreed that Bitcoin’s growth story isn’t linear anymore – “The market has outgrown the mining narrative. ETFs, hedge funds, and global macro forces are the real movers now.”

The massive liquidation event, coupled with geopolitical turmoil, highlights how far the crypto market has drifted from its early roots. What once revolved around miner supply and halving dates is now a highly financialized ecosystem, intertwined with global economic sentiment and Wall Street strategy. The old rhythm is gone – replaced by a more complex, less predictable one.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Author

Alexander Zdravkov is a person who always looks for the logic behind things. He is fluent in German and has more than 3 years of experience in the crypto space, where he skillfully identifies new trends in the world of digital currencies. Whether providing in-depth analysis or daily reports on all topics, his deep understanding and enthusiasm for what he does make him a valuable member of the team.



Next article

Source: https://coindoo.com/bitcoin-news-analysts-say-the-four-year-cycle-is-dead-heres-why/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
MAXI DOGE Holders Diversify into $GGs for Fast-Growth 2025 Crypto Presale Opportunities

MAXI DOGE Holders Diversify into $GGs for Fast-Growth 2025 Crypto Presale Opportunities

Presale crypto tokens have become some of the most active areas in Web3, offering early access to projects that blend culture, finance, and technology. Investors are constantly searching for the best crypto presale to buy right now, comparing new token presales across different niches. MAXI DOGE has gained attention for its meme-driven energy, but early [...] The post MAXI DOGE Holders Diversify into $GGs for Fast-Growth 2025 Crypto Presale Opportunities appeared first on Blockonomi.
Share
Blockonomi2025/09/18 00:00