South Korea' NTS has expanded crypto asset seizures, now targeting offline cold wallet holders.South Korea' NTS has expanded crypto asset seizures, now targeting offline cold wallet holders.

South Korea's National Tax Service to seize crypto assets in cold wallets

2025/10/11 02:08
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

South Korea’s  National Tax Service (NTS) warned crypto tax evaders that cold wallets are not beyond its reach. The regulator has vowed to conduct home searches as part of its ongoing crackdown on tax evasion.

The enforcement follows the authorities’ struggle to trace assets hidden in overseas exchanges and private storage devices. As of the end of June, the number of South Korean investors in virtual assets has nearly doubled from 1.2 million five years ago to 10.77 million.

National Tax Service intensifies efforts to seize crypto assets

Handkook Ilbo, a local news outlet, reported that cryptocurrency has become one of the major assets often used to evade taxes in South Korea. The local report claimed that tax evasion occurs because virtual assets are based on anonymity, and tracking cryptocurrency owners is more challenging than tracking financial transactions, such as stock purchases. 

According to the report, the South Korean NTS is prepared to inspect homes and seize hard drives and cold wallet devices. The NTS will seize hard drives and cold wallets if it suspects tax evaders are hiding their crypto holdings offline. In 2021, the NTS collected 71.2 billion won by seizing virtual assets from 5,741 high-value defaulters for the first time. The National Tax Collection Act gives the NTS the authority to request account information from local exchanges and freeze the accounts of tax delinquents.

According to the report, the NTS can seize digital assets from South Korean defaulters. The regulator can approach exchanges operating locally to obtain KYC information of defaulters to seize their assets. The inquiry is made in accordance with the “Question and Inspection Rights” as outlined in the National Tax Collection Act. If the defaulters’ accounts are found to hold digital assets, the regulator can request that the Exchange freeze the account.

According to Rep. Kim Young-jin of the Democratic Party of Korea, data from the NTS exposed a total of 14,140 delinquents who have had their virtual assets seized. The data showed that in the last four years, NTS seized 146.1 billion won of virtual assets.

Financial Supervisory Service revealed the amount of virtual assets transferred from domestic exchanges to cold wallets stood at 78.9 trillion won as of the first half of this year.

South Korea records a surge in crypto crime reports.

As Cryptopolitan reported on September 22,  Korean Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) statistics showed the number of suspicious transaction reports (STRs) filed by virtual asset operators between January and August this year reached 36,684. FIU revealed that the figure exceeded the combined total of 35,734 cases over the past two years.

FIU also revealed that the STRs filed between January and August surpassed the combined totals of 2023 and 2024, with STRs at 16,076 and 19,658, respectively. Korea Customs Service revealed that from August 2021 to August 2025, the scale of virtual asset-related crimes reached KRW 9.5613 trillion. Among the crimes, the scale of money laundering-type crimes was 8.6235 trillion won, accounting for 90.2% of the total. In May, the KCS caught a money changer who had illegally transferred approximately 57.1 billion won in cash, obtained from a Russian importer, into Tether.

Jin added that related organizations, such as the KCS and the FIU, should establish systematic measures against new types of foreign exchange crimes. He emphasized that the measure should be accompanied by effective crackdowns, such as tracking criminal funds and blocking disguised remittances.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Market Opportunity
Ambire Wallet Logo
Ambire Wallet Price(WALLET)
$0.00876
$0.00876$0.00876
+2.81%
USD
Ambire Wallet (WALLET) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
White House adviser: Cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage

White House adviser: Cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage

PANews reported on June 18 that according to Jinshi, a US White House adviser said that the cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage, which will create demand for the
Share
PANews2025/06/18 23:52
SEC approves Grayscale’s multi-crypto fund with XRP, SOL and ADA

SEC approves Grayscale’s multi-crypto fund with XRP, SOL and ADA

GDLC's approval coincides with SEC adopting generic listing standards for crypto ETFs, which would expedite the launch process.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 10:26