The post The Threat That Might Never Come appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin The notion that quantum computers could one day unravel Bitcoin’s code has long fascinated the crypto world. For some, it’s the digital equivalent of a doomsday prophecy; for others, it’s an overhyped distraction from the network’s real challenges. The latest spark came from market veteran Peter Brandt, who warned that the “ultimate risk” to Bitcoin isn’t regulation or competition – but rather the hypothetical day when someone unlocks Satoshi Nakamoto’s untouched Bitcoin trove. His concern stems from the belief that a future quantum computer could, in theory, break the cryptography protecting those long-dormant wallets. Satoshi’s Silent Fortune Roughly 1.1 million BTC, attributed to Bitcoin’s mysterious creator, has remained frozen for 15 years. No movement. No signatures. Just an enormous, sleeping fortune that has fueled endless speculation. Some in the community think those coins are lost forever – perhaps because Satoshi is gone. Others imagine they could someday reappear through an automated “dead man’s switch.” Either way, their immobility has become a symbol of Bitcoin’s purity and permanence. But Brandt and a handful of analysts, including Capriole founder Charles Edwards, argue that quantum technology might one day change that. They point to Shor’s algorithm, which – if run on a sufficiently powerful quantum machine – could reverse-engineer private keys from public data, effectively rendering old wallets vulnerable. How Real Is the Quantum Threat? For now, experts agree that the technology simply isn’t there. Quantum computers exist, but none come close to the scale needed to crack Bitcoin’s SHA-256 encryption. Even with rapid scientific progress, such power is believed to be decades away. “Quantum computing is a risk in theory, not in practice,” one researcher noted. “By the time it becomes feasible, Bitcoin will likely have evolved with post-quantum security.” That sentiment echoes across the crypto space. Chun Wang, co-founder of… The post The Threat That Might Never Come appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin The notion that quantum computers could one day unravel Bitcoin’s code has long fascinated the crypto world. For some, it’s the digital equivalent of a doomsday prophecy; for others, it’s an overhyped distraction from the network’s real challenges. The latest spark came from market veteran Peter Brandt, who warned that the “ultimate risk” to Bitcoin isn’t regulation or competition – but rather the hypothetical day when someone unlocks Satoshi Nakamoto’s untouched Bitcoin trove. His concern stems from the belief that a future quantum computer could, in theory, break the cryptography protecting those long-dormant wallets. Satoshi’s Silent Fortune Roughly 1.1 million BTC, attributed to Bitcoin’s mysterious creator, has remained frozen for 15 years. No movement. No signatures. Just an enormous, sleeping fortune that has fueled endless speculation. Some in the community think those coins are lost forever – perhaps because Satoshi is gone. Others imagine they could someday reappear through an automated “dead man’s switch.” Either way, their immobility has become a symbol of Bitcoin’s purity and permanence. But Brandt and a handful of analysts, including Capriole founder Charles Edwards, argue that quantum technology might one day change that. They point to Shor’s algorithm, which – if run on a sufficiently powerful quantum machine – could reverse-engineer private keys from public data, effectively rendering old wallets vulnerable. How Real Is the Quantum Threat? For now, experts agree that the technology simply isn’t there. Quantum computers exist, but none come close to the scale needed to crack Bitcoin’s SHA-256 encryption. Even with rapid scientific progress, such power is believed to be decades away. “Quantum computing is a risk in theory, not in practice,” one researcher noted. “By the time it becomes feasible, Bitcoin will likely have evolved with post-quantum security.” That sentiment echoes across the crypto space. Chun Wang, co-founder of…

The Threat That Might Never Come

Bitcoin

The notion that quantum computers could one day unravel Bitcoin’s code has long fascinated the crypto world.

For some, it’s the digital equivalent of a doomsday prophecy; for others, it’s an overhyped distraction from the network’s real challenges.

The latest spark came from market veteran Peter Brandt, who warned that the “ultimate risk” to Bitcoin isn’t regulation or competition – but rather the hypothetical day when someone unlocks Satoshi Nakamoto’s untouched Bitcoin trove. His concern stems from the belief that a future quantum computer could, in theory, break the cryptography protecting those long-dormant wallets.

Satoshi’s Silent Fortune

Roughly 1.1 million BTC, attributed to Bitcoin’s mysterious creator, has remained frozen for 15 years. No movement. No signatures. Just an enormous, sleeping fortune that has fueled endless speculation.

Some in the community think those coins are lost forever – perhaps because Satoshi is gone. Others imagine they could someday reappear through an automated “dead man’s switch.” Either way, their immobility has become a symbol of Bitcoin’s purity and permanence.

But Brandt and a handful of analysts, including Capriole founder Charles Edwards, argue that quantum technology might one day change that. They point to Shor’s algorithm, which – if run on a sufficiently powerful quantum machine – could reverse-engineer private keys from public data, effectively rendering old wallets vulnerable.

How Real Is the Quantum Threat?

For now, experts agree that the technology simply isn’t there. Quantum computers exist, but none come close to the scale needed to crack Bitcoin’s SHA-256 encryption. Even with rapid scientific progress, such power is believed to be decades away.

“Quantum computing is a risk in theory, not in practice,” one researcher noted. “By the time it becomes feasible, Bitcoin will likely have evolved with post-quantum security.”

That sentiment echoes across the crypto space. Chun Wang, co-founder of F2Pool and one of Bitcoin’s early miners, recently dismissed the quantum narrative as “science fiction,” joking that developers should focus on making Bitcoin usable beyond Earth before worrying about hackers from the future.

Preparing for Tomorrow, Without the Panic

Developers and cryptographers are already working on post-quantum cryptography, designing algorithms that would resist even the most advanced computing breakthroughs. These updates could be integrated into the Bitcoin protocol well before any credible quantum threat emerges.

For now, the real story isn’t that quantum computers might destroy Bitcoin – it’s how the fear of them keeps inspiring innovation.

Until proven otherwise, Satoshi’s coins remain untouched, and Bitcoin’s cryptography continues to hold strong. The mystery endures, not because of quantum computers, but because the system has survived every challenge thrown its way – mathematical or otherwise.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Author

Alexander Zdravkov is a person who always looks for the logic behind things. He is fluent in German and has more than 3 years of experience in the crypto space, where he skillfully identifies new trends in the world of digital currencies. Whether providing in-depth analysis or daily reports on all topics, his deep understanding and enthusiasm for what he does make him a valuable member of the team.



Next article

Source: https://coindoo.com/quantum-computers-vs-bitcoin-the-threat-that-might-never-come/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50
Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36