The obsession with AI as a headline in itself is lazy, says author. It clogs up journalists’ inboxes, floods editorial calendars, and drowns out the rare gems of actual news that deserve coverage.The obsession with AI as a headline in itself is lazy, says author. It clogs up journalists’ inboxes, floods editorial calendars, and drowns out the rare gems of actual news that deserve coverage.

Thirty Reports, Zero News: The AI PR Machine Has Gone Too Far

I’ve lost count of how many AI reports have landed in my inbox this week—actually, no, I haven’t: over thirty. Thirty-plus “groundbreaking” AI studies, surveys, forecasts, and whitepapers, all churned out by PR agencies desperate to hitch their clients to the AI bandwagon. And honestly? It’s getting stale. Painfully stale.

Every single report follows the same tired formula: “AI adoption is growing,” “X% of businesses are using AI tools,” “AI will transform industries by [insert arbitrary year here].”

Hey, check this out—another AI “reveal,” this time from Atlassian by way their PR agency Ogilvy.com AI is soaring, but teamwork is harder. Seriously? How many times have we seen this headline dressed up in slightly different wording?

It’s like déjà vu every single week. Enough already. There are literally thousands of other technologies, breakthroughs, and stories happening in the world right now, yet all we get is the same reheated AI talking point. Journalism deserves better.

Readers deserve better. Stop with the copy-paste AI hype machine and bring us some actual news. None of this is new. None of it is original. It’s all recycled talking points, a rinse-and-repeat PR machine that screams trend-chasing rather than genuine insight.

As a journalist and site owner, I’m looking for news. Real news. Tell me about the company that actually built something different. Tell me about the business that crashed and burned because their “AI-powered” solution didn’t work.

Tell me about the legal implications, the ethical dilemmas, the failures no one wants to admit publicly. Give me something human, something raw, something that goes beyond another glossy PDF stuffed with pie charts and buzzwords.

The obsession with AI as a headline in itself is lazy. AI isn’t the story anymore—it’s the backdrop. Just like the internet, mobile, or cloud once were.

We don’t need yet another firm saying “AI is changing the workplace.” We know. What’s changing because of it? Who’s winning, who’s losing, and where are the cracks in the hype?

What frustrates me most is how much of this is driven by PR agencies trying to tick a box. They’re not pushing for originality; they’re pushing volume. It clogs up journalists’ inboxes, floods editorial calendars, and drowns out the rare gems of actual news that deserve coverage.

AI is important, no doubt—but the constant deluge of shallow reports is killing curiosity. It’s making the space boring, predictable, and stripped of authenticity.

The industry doesn’t need thirty cookie-cutter “AI adoption reports” in a week. What it needs are voices brave enough to cut through the noise and tell stories that matter.

Until then, most of these reports aren’t news—they’re just background noise. And the more agencies push them, the faster readers will tune out.


:::warning Editor's note: This story represents the views of the author of the story. The author is not affiliated with HackerNoon staff and wrote this story on their own. The HackerNoon editorial team has only verified the story for grammatical accuracy and does not condone/condemn any of the claims contained herein. #DYOR

:::

\

Market Opportunity
ZeroLend Logo
ZeroLend Price(ZERO)
$0,00000807
$0,00000807$0,00000807
+5,61%
USD
ZeroLend (ZERO) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Stellar (XLM) Eyes $0.28 After Roadmap Signals Stablecoin and Lending Growth

Stellar (XLM) Eyes $0.28 After Roadmap Signals Stablecoin and Lending Growth

Stellar (XLM) is taking major steps in the world of DeFi with its new Q1 2026 roadmap that has been rolled out. This new roadmap is focused on the upcoming mainnet
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/12 03:30
X Smart Cashtags: Elon Musk’s Platform Eyes Crypto and Stock Trading Integration

X Smart Cashtags: Elon Musk’s Platform Eyes Crypto and Stock Trading Integration

A newly teased feature called Smart Cashtags, revealed by X’s head of product Nikita Bier, suggests the platform is moving beyond passive market commentary toward
Share
Coinstats2026/01/12 02:18
Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36