TLDR Bitcoin ETFs experienced significant outflows, totaling $363.17 million on September 22. Fidelity’s FBTC led Bitcoin ETF withdrawals with $276.68 million. Ethereum ETFs saw a total net outflow of $75.95 million on the same day. BlackRock’s Ethereum ETF, ETHA, recorded a withdrawal of $15.07 million. Trading volume in Bitcoin ETFs reached $3.43 billion with net [...] The post BlackRock Leads $76M Outflows in Ethereum ETFs Amid Market Shifts appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Bitcoin ETFs experienced significant outflows, totaling $363.17 million on September 22. Fidelity’s FBTC led Bitcoin ETF withdrawals with $276.68 million. Ethereum ETFs saw a total net outflow of $75.95 million on the same day. BlackRock’s Ethereum ETF, ETHA, recorded a withdrawal of $15.07 million. Trading volume in Bitcoin ETFs reached $3.43 billion with net [...] The post BlackRock Leads $76M Outflows in Ethereum ETFs Amid Market Shifts appeared first on CoinCentral.

BlackRock Leads $76M Outflows in Ethereum ETFs Amid Market Shifts

TLDR

  • Bitcoin ETFs experienced significant outflows, totaling $363.17 million on September 22.
  • Fidelity’s FBTC led Bitcoin ETF withdrawals with $276.68 million.
  • Ethereum ETFs saw a total net outflow of $75.95 million on the same day.
  • BlackRock’s Ethereum ETF, ETHA, recorded a withdrawal of $15.07 million.
  • Trading volume in Bitcoin ETFs reached $3.43 billion with net assets of $148.09 billion.

BlackRock and major firms report $76M outflows in Ethereum ETFs, signaling shifts in crypto market trends and investor behavior. Bitcoin ETFs recorded sharp withdrawals on September 22, signaling another volatile trading session. Net outflows reached $363.17 million, led by Fidelity’s FBTC. Ark & 21Shares followed with $52.30 million, while Grayscale GBTC registered $24.65 million in redemptions.

Moreover, VanEck’s HOLD sold $9.54 million, adding to the sector’s losses. Trading activity, however, stayed elevated, with volumes reaching $3.43 billion. Net assets totaled $148.09 billion, representing 6.59% of Bitcoin’s market cap.

Bitcoin traded at $112,890, showing a 2.2% weekly decline. Its market cap stood at $2.249 trillion, while daily trading volume crossed $67.205 billion. Analysts noted that institutional demand remains strong, despite short-term volatility.

Ethereum ETFs Record $76M in Outflows

Ethereum ETFs also posted significant outflows, with total daily withdrawals of $75.95 million. BlackRock ETHA led withdrawals with $15.07 million, while Fidelity FETH posted $33.12 million. Bitwise ETHW saw $22.30 million in redemptions, and Grayscale ETH followed with $5.4 million.

Trading activity across Ethereum ETFs stayed firm, with $2.06 billion in turnover. Net assets reached $27.52 billion, accounting for 5.45% of Ethereum’s market capitalization. SoSoValue reported that none of the nine ETFs recorded inflows during the session.

Ethereum traded at $4,192.30, reflecting renewed support despite withdrawals. Its market capitalization stood at $506.155 billion, while trading volume jumped to $46.192 billion. This rise in volume highlighted continued institutional interest.

Interest Rate Cuts Fuel Crypto ETF Engagement

Both Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs remained under pressure from large withdrawals. Yet trading volumes showed strong activity, suggesting confidence in the digital asset sector. “Institutional participation continues to grow,” noted market observers.

Furthermore, interest rate cuts supported risk appetite, pushing investors toward cryptocurrencies. ETFs from BlackRock and other firms continue to play a pivotal role. Outflows underscored repositioning but volumes highlighted robust market engagement.

The post BlackRock Leads $76M Outflows in Ethereum ETFs Amid Market Shifts appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

The post QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. QNT’s MACD histogram showing a positive trend and RSI stabilizing in the neutral zone
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/21 23:54
SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

The post SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shiba Inu is forming a death cross
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 00:26