The post ‘These Fiat Arguments Regarding OP_RETURN Need to Go’ — Jimmy Song appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jimmy Song, a Bitcoin (BTC) developer and advocate, slammed the decision by Bitcoin Core developers to remove the OP_Return limit for non-monetary data embedded on the Bitcoin blockchain in the upcoming Bitcoin Core 30 upgrade, calling it “fiat” mentality. Song accused the Core developers of deflecting user concerns about removing the OP_Return limit, which is currently 80 bytes in size, and ignoring the significant pushback from the Bitcoin community and node runners. He also said: “The idea that spam is difficult to define, and because of this ambiguity, we shouldn’t be making any distinctions at all in the software, is a time-wasting argument from fiat politics where you pretend not to know the obvious, so the actual debate can never get off the ground — the non-monetary uses of Bitcoin are spam. You can argue whether that’s something desirable or not, but saying you can’t define it is a stalling tactic meant to avoid the real argument about actual impact — particularly, the long-term impact of this change,” Song continued. The pull request for removing the OP_Return limit was highly unpopular with the Bitcoin community, but was pushed through regardless. Source: GitHub The OP_Return debate has raged on for nearly six months, and is reminiscent of the Bitcoin block size wars that took place between 2015 and 2017, which eventually resulted in a hard fork of the Bitcoin protocol that spawned Bitcoin Cash (BCH), leading some in the Bitcoin community to speculate if the OP_Return wars will result in a similar split. Related: Taproot creators didn’t foresee its ‘trolling value’ — Bitcoin dev Node runners vote with their feet in historic exodus to Bitcoin Knots The decision by Bitcoin Core devs to unilaterally blow open the OP_Return data limit has left the Bitcoin community divided and driven record numbers of… The post ‘These Fiat Arguments Regarding OP_RETURN Need to Go’ — Jimmy Song appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jimmy Song, a Bitcoin (BTC) developer and advocate, slammed the decision by Bitcoin Core developers to remove the OP_Return limit for non-monetary data embedded on the Bitcoin blockchain in the upcoming Bitcoin Core 30 upgrade, calling it “fiat” mentality. Song accused the Core developers of deflecting user concerns about removing the OP_Return limit, which is currently 80 bytes in size, and ignoring the significant pushback from the Bitcoin community and node runners. He also said: “The idea that spam is difficult to define, and because of this ambiguity, we shouldn’t be making any distinctions at all in the software, is a time-wasting argument from fiat politics where you pretend not to know the obvious, so the actual debate can never get off the ground — the non-monetary uses of Bitcoin are spam. You can argue whether that’s something desirable or not, but saying you can’t define it is a stalling tactic meant to avoid the real argument about actual impact — particularly, the long-term impact of this change,” Song continued. The pull request for removing the OP_Return limit was highly unpopular with the Bitcoin community, but was pushed through regardless. Source: GitHub The OP_Return debate has raged on for nearly six months, and is reminiscent of the Bitcoin block size wars that took place between 2015 and 2017, which eventually resulted in a hard fork of the Bitcoin protocol that spawned Bitcoin Cash (BCH), leading some in the Bitcoin community to speculate if the OP_Return wars will result in a similar split. Related: Taproot creators didn’t foresee its ‘trolling value’ — Bitcoin dev Node runners vote with their feet in historic exodus to Bitcoin Knots The decision by Bitcoin Core devs to unilaterally blow open the OP_Return data limit has left the Bitcoin community divided and driven record numbers of…

‘These Fiat Arguments Regarding OP_RETURN Need to Go’ — Jimmy Song

Jimmy Song, a Bitcoin (BTC) developer and advocate, slammed the decision by Bitcoin Core developers to remove the OP_Return limit for non-monetary data embedded on the Bitcoin blockchain in the upcoming Bitcoin Core 30 upgrade, calling it “fiat” mentality.

Song accused the Core developers of deflecting user concerns about removing the OP_Return limit, which is currently 80 bytes in size, and ignoring the significant pushback from the Bitcoin community and node runners. He also said:

You can argue whether that’s something desirable or not, but saying you can’t define it is a stalling tactic meant to avoid the real argument about actual impact — particularly, the long-term impact of this change,” Song continued.

The pull request for removing the OP_Return limit was highly unpopular with the Bitcoin community, but was pushed through regardless. Source: GitHub

The OP_Return debate has raged on for nearly six months, and is reminiscent of the Bitcoin block size wars that took place between 2015 and 2017, which eventually resulted in a hard fork of the Bitcoin protocol that spawned Bitcoin Cash (BCH), leading some in the Bitcoin community to speculate if the OP_Return wars will result in a similar split.

Related: Taproot creators didn’t foresee its ‘trolling value’ — Bitcoin dev

Node runners vote with their feet in historic exodus to Bitcoin Knots

The decision by Bitcoin Core devs to unilaterally blow open the OP_Return data limit has left the Bitcoin community divided and driven record numbers of Bitcoin node runners to Bitcoin Knots, an alternative implementation of the Bitcoin node software.

This surge in nodes running Bitcoin Knots, which now account for about 20% of the network, compared to about 1% in 2024, represents a near-vertical leap in just nine months.

A breakdown of the different node software implementations on the Bitcoin network. Source: Coin Dance

Knots allows node runners to enforce strict data size limits, which proponents argue is necessary to preserve the decentralization of the Bitcoin protocol.

The Bitcoin ledger has generated about 680 gigabytes of data since the inception of the decentralized protocol in 2009, thanks to the simple architecture of Bitcoin and strict data limits.

Bitcoin’s low data storage requirements allow anyone to run a node on retail computer hardware for as little as $300, democratizing access and ensuring maximum decentralization.

For comparison, higher-throughput blockchain networks and smart contract platforms, which generate far more data, can cost tens of thousands of dollars to run and require specialized commercial hardware, meaning only wealthy investors and large corporations can run nodes and enforce the consensus rules of those protocols.

Robust hardware requirements translate into increased centralization of a blockchain protocol and a heightened risk that a few nodes can collude to alter the consensus rules or reverse transactions.

Magazine: Bitcoin’s long-term security budget problem: Impending crisis or FUD?

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/jimmy-song-slams-bitcoin-core-fiat-mentality-op-return?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Cash Node Logo
Bitcoin Cash Node Price(BCH)
$594.4
$594.4$594.4
+4.04%
USD
Bitcoin Cash Node (BCH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Steak ’n Shake $0.21 Bitcoin Bonus for Employees Faces Backlash

Steak ’n Shake $0.21 Bitcoin Bonus for Employees Faces Backlash

        Highlights:  Steak ’n Shake will give workers a $0.21 Bitcoin bonus for each hour worked.  Employees may earn about $800 in two years, but critics c
Share
Coinstats2026/01/21 18:14
China’s Ban on Nvidia Chips for State Firms Sends Stock Tumbling

China’s Ban on Nvidia Chips for State Firms Sends Stock Tumbling

The post China’s Ban on Nvidia Chips for State Firms Sends Stock Tumbling appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) has instructed big companies to stop purchasing and cancel existing orders for Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D chip The ban is part of China’s ongoing effort to reduce dependency on US-made AI hardware, especially after restrictive US export rules After the news, Nvidia shares dropped in premarket trading by about 1.5% Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) has instructed big companies like Alibaba and ByteDance to stop purchasing and cancel existing orders for Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D chip. The ban is part of China’s ongoing effort to reduce dependency on US-made AI hardware, especially after restrictive US export rules. The RTX Pro 6000D was tailored for China to comply with some export rules, but now the regulator says even that chip is off-limits. After the news, Nvidia shares dropped in premarket trading (around 1.5%), reflecting investors’ concerns about reduced demand in one of the biggest markets. This isn’t the first time China has done something like this. For instance, in August, the country urged firms not to use Nvidia’s H20 chip due to potential security issues and the need to comply with international export control regulations. Meanwhile, Alibaba and Baidu have begun using domestically produced AI chips more heavily, which shows that China is seriously investing in building its own chip-making capacity. Additionally, a few days ago, Chinese regulators opened an antitrust review into Nvidia’s Mellanox acquisition, suggesting the company may have broken some of the promises it made to get the 2020 deal passed. From AI to blockchain and the possible effects of China’s ban The banning of Nvidia chips represents a rather notable escalation in the technological rivalry between the United States and China. Beyond tariffs or export bans, China is now proactively telling its firms to avoid even “compliant” US chips and instead shift…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:46
Dogecoin Price Prediction For 2025, As Analysts Call Pepeto The Next 100x

Dogecoin Price Prediction For 2025, As Analysts Call Pepeto The Next 100x

Traders hunting the best crypto to buy now and the best crypto investment in 2025 keep watching doge, yet today’s […] The post Dogecoin Price Prediction For 2025, As Analysts Call Pepeto The Next 100x appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 00:39