MEXC is our top SafeTrade alternative within this comparison: on 6 October 2026 CoinGecko showed 1,448 coins and a 0.775% average spread on MEXC against 53 coins and 13.46% on SafeTrade. SafeTrade isMEXC is our top SafeTrade alternative within this comparison: on 6 October 2026 CoinGecko showed 1,448 coins and a 0.775% average spread on MEXC against 53 coins and 13.46% on SafeTrade. SafeTrade is
SafeTrade Alternatives: What Does a 13.5% Average Spread Cost on a $3,000 Trade?
MEXC is our top SafeTrade alternative within this comparison: on 6 October 2026 CoinGecko showed 1,448 coins and a 0.775% average spread on MEXC against 53 coins and 13.46% on SafeTrade.
SafeTrade is still one of only two tracked venues for Pearl (PRL), and MEXC is not available in the US or UK.
Key Takeaways
- Within this comparison MEXC is our top SafeTrade alternative, with 1,448 CoinGecko-tracked coins, a 0.775% average spread and 0% spot maker fees against SafeTrade's 53 coins and 13.46% spread on 6 October 2026.
- A $3,000 market round trip costs about $404 in spread at SafeTrade's page average and about $26 on MEXC including taker fees, before any SafeTrade trading fee, which we could not verify.
- SafeTrade clears one of our three trust checks: CoinGecko tracks it, but scores it 2 out of 10 with no reserve data, and its fee and terms pages could not be opened on 6 October 2026.
- None of the regulator lists we checked names safetrade.com, while MEXC carries a Seychelles FSA press release of 26 May 2026 and a Dubai VARA notice of 22 June 2026, both linked below.
- Three pairs, PRL/USDT, QTC/USDT and TSC/USDT, carried about 89% of SafeTrade's $2.69 million daily volume, and 27 of its 50 displayed markets traded under $1,000.
- Bybit, OKX, Bitget, KuCoin and Gate round out the list, and bots pay more on MEXC's API futures schedule of 0.06% maker and 0.08% taker than on several rivals' base rates.
This guide covers the cryptocurrency exchange at safetrade.com, not the car-sale escrow service, the police meet-up zones or the firms on regulator warning lists that share the SafeTrade name.
Traders leave a small exchange for a reason that rarely shows on a fee page: the order book is so thin that every market order pays more in spread than in commission.
Below, we price that gap on a $3,000 trade, run SafeTrade through three trust checks, and set six alternatives side by side with dated sources.
Why Is MEXC Our Top SafeTrade Alternative?
MEXC is our top pick because the cost that hurts most on a thin exchange, the gap between the ask you buy at and the bid you sell at, is roughly 17 times narrower there: CoinGecko measured a 0.775% average spread on MEXC and 13.46% on SafeTrade on 6 October 2026.
On a book that thin, a market order pays the spread on the way in and again on the way out, and no fee discount wins it back.
MEXC's standard spot schedule charges 0% maker and 0.05% taker, so a trader who rests limit orders pays no fee and never crosses the spread at all.
The 1,448 coins and 1,831 spot pairs CoinGecko tracked that day sit on a book the tracker rates Moderate for liquidity, against Low for SafeTrade.
The fee schedule MEXC publishes lists those two spot rates and flags that a few regions and promotions run on different numbers.
The same page puts the taker rate at 0.04% when fees are settled in MX.
Take a $3,000 market buy followed by a $3,000 market sell.
At SafeTrade's page-average spread of 13.46%, crossing the book twice costs about $404 before any trading fee.
At MEXC's 0.775% page average, the same round trip costs about $23 in spread plus $3 in taker fees, about $26 in all.
Trade BTC/USDT on MEXC, where the spread was 0.01%, and the spread cost falls to about 30 cents, so the $3 in fees is almost the whole bill.
Rest both orders as limits on MEXC and the fee line reads $0.00, because makers pay nothing.
SafeTrade's busiest pair, PRL/USDT, showed a 0.84% spread, so a trader who only touches that market pays about $25 in spread, plus whatever fee the trading screen shows.
Repeat the average-pair trade every month and a year costs about $4,846 at SafeTrade against about $315 on MEXC.
The page-average figure is a blunt tool: CoinGecko averages every tracked pair, SafeTrade's long tail of thin markets pulls its number up, and its busiest pair sits under 1%.
MEXC's edge also narrows for bots, which pay 0.06% maker and 0.08% taker on its API futures schedule, and the exchange does not serve the United States or the United Kingdom.
Ten regions, Australia and the UK among them, are excluded from its 500x futures tier, which this spot comparison does not price.
Where Do Six Alternatives Stand Next to SafeTrade?
The table sets SafeTrade beside MEXC and five large exchanges on the six checks we run on every exchange: published spot fees, CoinGecko coin counts, Trust Score, reserve reporting, identity verification and the one feature each venue is known for.
SafeTrade's fee cell is blank for a reason: its fee page returned an access error on both of our attempts on 6 October 2026, so the only figure we have is the one on its CoinGecko listing.
Exchange | Spot fees | Coins (CoinGecko) | Trust Score | Reserves | KYC | Standout |
SafeTrade | Fee page could not be opened on 6 October 2026; CoinGecko lists 0.0015% | 53 | 2 out of 10 | No reserve data on CoinGecko | Not stated on pages we could open | One of two tracked venues for Pearl (PRL) |
MEXC | Maker 0%, taker 0.05%, or 0.04% when paid in MX | 1,448 | 9 out of 10 | Hacken audit each month; 10 September 2026 snapshot | Three tiers: Primary, Advanced, Institutional | 0% maker across 1,831 spot pairs |
Bybit | 0.1000% maker, 0.1000% taker | 447 | 9 out of 10 | Monthly proof of reserves | Required | Derivatives depth and options |
OKX | 0.080% maker, 0.100% taker | 306 | 10 out of 10 | Monthly proof of reserves | Required | Options and multi-region licences |
Bitget | 0.1% maker, 0.1% taker | 580 | 10 out of 10 before its 24 September 2026 incident | Monthly proof of reserves | Required | Copy trading |
KuCoin | Class A tokens: 0.1% both sides | 889 | 9 out of 10 | Reserve data tracked by CoinGecko | Required | Built-in trading bots |
Gate | 0.100% maker, 0.100% taker | 1,534 | 10 out of 10 | Proof-of-reserves page, per Gate | Required | Widest listing menu; MiCA licence via Malta |
Sources: CoinGecko exchange pages for SafeTrade and MEXC, 6 October 2026; MEXC fee page as recorded 10 September 2026; Bybit, OKX, Bitget, KuCoin and Gate figures as published in our earlier guides, with CoinGecko counts taken between 2 and 21 September 2026, each verified against the platform's official fee schedule, help center and terms.
A second table isolates the two exchanges this guide is about, using only fields CoinGecko showed for both on the same day.
CoinGecko field, 6 October 2026 | SafeTrade | MEXC |
Trust Score | 2 out of 10 | 9 out of 10 |
Average spread | 13.46% | 0.78% |
Liquidity | Low | Moderate |
24-hour volume | About $2.69 million | About $1.30 billion |
Coins and pairs | 53 and 68 | 1,448 and 1,831 |
Exchange reserves | Data unavailable | About $618 million |
Regulatory field | No authorization identified | International crypto licence, Comoros |
Incidents | None recorded | None recorded |
Fiat deposits | None | Bank transfer, card, Apple Pay, Google Pay |
Source: CoinGecko exchange pages for SafeTrade and MEXC, both read on 6 October 2026; MEXC fiat channels per its official fiat guide.
Whether an exchange lets you read its fee schedule before you register is a test in its own right, and which exchanges post their fees in public is a question SafeTrade's page did not let us answer.
For the pairs where maker fees reach zero, the zero-fee lines we verified across eight schedules shows how rare a 0% line on every spot pair is.
What Is SafeTrade's $2.69 Million of Daily Volume Made Of?
Three pairs made up about 89% of the $2.69 million in 24-hour volume CoinGecko reported for SafeTrade on 6 October 2026: PRL/USDT at 74.64%, QTC/USDT at 11.09% and TSC/USDT at 3.21%, while BTC/USDT contributed 0.48% and 27 of the 50 displayed markets traded under $1,000.
PRL/USDT alone reported about $2.02 million, with a 0.84% spread and about $34,000 of bids within 2% of the price.
The next two pairs by volume, QTC/USDT and TSC/USDT, showed spreads of 2.20% and 3.48%.
USDC/USDT was the exception, with a 0.10% spread and about $1.05 million of asks and $2.11 million of bids within 2%, by far the deepest book on the exchange.
The majors told a different story: BTC/USDT reported $12,922 of volume at a 0.35% spread, and ETH/USDT reported $5,894 at 3.28%.
Further down the table, SOL/BTC showed an 11.97% spread, AVAX/USDT 16.93% and POL/USDT 12.01%, which is where the page-average figure comes from.
Pearl itself is a proof-of-work layer-one token that CoinGecko ranked 129th by market capitalisation at about $392 million, and the tracker lists only two exchanges for it, SafeTrade and BigONE, each carrying about half of its reported volume.
For a Pearl holder that concentration is a feature; for anyone trading the top 50 coins it means a venue whose entire BTC market turned over less than $13,000 in a day.
How Does SafeTrade Score on Our Three Trust Checks?
SafeTrade clears one check out of three: CoinGecko tracks it, which is the first test, but the tracker scored it 2 out of 10 on 6 October 2026 with no reserve data and no regulatory authorization identified, and the pages that would name its operator could not be opened.
Check 1: Is It on an Independent Tracker?
Yes, and that matters, because an exchange no third party measures cannot be checked by a retail user at all.
The 2 out of 10 score breaks down into Low liquidity, a cybersecurity row CoinGecko marks as data unavailable, including penetration test, reserve audit and bug bounty, and a regulation row that reads none identified.
CoinGecko gives liquidity half the weight in that score, with regulation at 15%, cybersecurity at 20%, incidents at 10% and proof of reserves at 5%, as its published Trust Score weighting sets out.
MEXC scored 9 out of 10 the same day, with Moderate liquidity, a three-star cybersecurity rating that records a penetration test and a bug bounty, and no incident on file for either exchange.
Check 2: Evidence of Reserves
Not at SafeTrade, where CoinGecko's reserve field reads data unavailable and we found no reserve report of its own.
MEXC's reserves are audited by Hacken every month, and the September 2026 report, taken from a snapshot of 10 September, put BTC backing at 297%, with 12,202.13 BTC held against 4,106.57 BTC owed, USDT at 119%, USDC at 111% and ETH at 111%.
Each report covers proof of liabilities, proof of ownership and the reserve calculation, and any user can check their own balance in the Merkle tree on the MEXC proof-of-reserves page.
Reserves decide who gets paid when something goes wrong, which is the lesson of 81 breaches and the money that came back.
Check 3: Who Is Behind It?
SafeTrade's terms page, the document that would name its operator, returned an access error twice on 6 October 2026, and CoinGecko lists no regulatory authorization for it.
Our scan of the UK FCA warning list, the Hong Kong SFC alert list and Dubai VARA's regulatory notices found no entry naming safetrade.com.
Two firms that use the SafeTrade name on other domains do appear on the FCA list, so check the domain before you trust any page that calls itself SafeTrade.
MEXC's record is longer and we set it out in full.
CoinGecko's regulation row for MEXC shows an international crypto licence from Comoros and attaches its own caveat, calling the framework defined but unproven.
Seychelles' FSA said on 26 May 2026 that it had found no licence under its Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2024 for MX Global Ltd, the company it identifies as the MEXC operator, and that enforcement would follow.
Dubai's VARA followed on 22 June 2026 with a notice of fines against MX Global Ltd for serving Dubai customers without a licence from 2022 to April 2026 and for onboarding users short of UAE know-your-customer rules, adding that the firm cooperated and intends to apply for a licence.
Read both documents before deciding where to hold funds; they are the reason this guide does not call MEXC a licensed venue.
Which Five Exchanges Round Out the SafeTrade Alternatives?
Five large exchanges complete the shortlist, each for a different job: Bybit for derivatives depth, OKX for a unified account and licences in several regions, Bitget for copy trading, KuCoin for built-in bots and Gate for listing breadth, with the fees, licences and recent events that count against each listed below.
Every figure carries the verification date from the guide it was first published in, and the alternatives ranking we keep across exchanges scores a wider field on the same rows.
Bybit
Benefits
- Futures cost 0.0200% maker and 0.0550% taker, with options and a unified trading account for traders who hedge across products.
- Monthly proof of reserves, a 9 out of 10 CoinGecko score and 447 tracked coins.
- Bybit EU holds a MiCA licence, which MEXC does not.
Limitations
- Spot trading costs 0.1000% on both sides, or 0.075% when fees are paid in MNT, against 0% maker on MEXC.
- Identity verification is mandatory before trading.
- Bybit has withdrawn from Japan, so Japanese readers need another venue.
OKX
Benefits
- A unified account lets one collateral pool margin spot, perpetuals and options together.
- Futures run at 0.02% maker and 0.05% taker, with monthly proof of reserves and a 10 out of 10 CoinGecko score.
- OKX holds a MiCA licence for the EU, and OKX US and OKJ serve the United States and Japan as separate entities.
Limitations
- At 306 tracked coins, OKX's menu is the narrowest in this table.
- Spot fees of 0.080% maker and 0.100% taker are mid-table rather than low.
- Verification is required, and the separate regional entities mean account terms differ by country.
Bitget
Benefits
- Copy trading is the core product, with stock futures alongside crypto perpetuals.
- Futures cost 0.02% maker and 0.06% taker, and reserves are published monthly.
- CoinGecko tracked 580 coins and scored it 10 out of 10 before its September incident.
Limitations
- Bitget's hot and warm wallets lost about $387.5 million to an attack on 24 September 2026, withdrawals returned in stages from 28 September, and Bitget says the loss sits with its Protection Fund rather than its users.
- Japanese accounts move to close-only mode on 1 November 2026, with open positions force-closed after 31 December 2026.
- Spot fees are 0.1% on both sides, or 0.08% with BGB, and verification has been mandatory since September 2023.
KuCoin
Benefits
- CoinGecko tracked 889 coins, second only to Gate and MEXC in this table.
- Its grid and recurring-buy bots run inside the exchange itself.
- Futures cost 0.02% maker and 0.06% taker, with a 9 out of 10 CoinGecko score.
Limitations
- The United States is outside KuCoin's service area.
- Spot fees of 0.1% on both sides apply to Class A tokens only, and other classes cost more.
- Identity verification is required, and reserve data is tracked by CoinGecko rather than published as a monthly audit.
Gate
Benefits
- CoinGecko tracked 1,534 coins and 1,677 pairs, the widest menu in this table.
- Gate holds a MiCA licence through Malta and runs a proof-of-reserves page, per its own disclosures.
- Gate's perpetuals charge 0.015% to 0.02% on the maker side and 0.05% on the taker side.
Limitations
- Spot fees are 0.100% on both sides, 0.090% with GT, and the 0% maker rate applies only at VIP 15.
- Gate does not serve the United States, and Japan is served through a separate entity.
- Verification is required before trading.
Where Does SafeTrade Still Hold an Edge?
SafeTrade keeps three things a larger venue cannot copy on demand: it is one of only two CoinGecko-tracked exchanges for Pearl (PRL) and handled about half of that token's reported volume, its USDC/USDT book showed roughly $1 million of asks within 2% at a 0.10% spread, and CoinGecko records it as operating since 2018.
A Pearl holder has nowhere else to go on a tracked exchange except BigONE, and SafeTrade's PRL/USDT spread of 0.84% is the tightest of its non-stablecoin markets.
Smaller proof-of-work and privacy projects such as Qubic, Verus and Xelis also trade there, and some of them have no market at all on the five large exchanges above.
Its stablecoin pair is a real book, not a token one, which makes SafeTrade usable as an exit ramp from PRL into USDC.
None of that changes the trust checks, but it explains who still has a reason to keep an account there.
How Do You Move Coins Off SafeTrade Without Losing Them?
Three steps cover it: tighten your SafeTrade account security before you touch the withdrawal page, pick a network that both exchanges support, and send a small test amount before the balance, because a wrong network or memo on a thin exchange can take weeks to recover, if it is recovered at all.
Step 1: Lock the account down first.
Turn on two-factor authentication at SafeTrade if it is not already on, and confirm the email tied to the account still belongs to you.
Keep screenshots of your balances and open orders, since SafeTrade's pages we tried did not expose a fee or limit schedule you could later cite.
Step 2: Match the network on both sides.
Open the destination exchange's deposit page for the same coin, copy its address and network name, and compare them to the withdrawal options SafeTrade shows.
USDT on TRC-20 is the cheapest common route into MEXC, which charges nothing on deposits and 0.5 USDT on withdrawals back out, per its fee page as recorded on 28 August 2026.
For Pearl, check whether your destination lists it at all before you withdraw, because CoinGecko shows only two venues for the token.
Step 3: Test, then move the rest.
Send the smallest amount the withdrawal screen allows, wait for it to land, and only then send the balance in one or two transfers.
Write down the transaction IDs, the fee SafeTrade charged and the time each transfer took, because that record is your only evidence if a transfer stalls.
The MEXC View
MEXC operates this site, so read this section as our own case rather than a neutral verdict, and note that it opens with what SafeTrade and the five exchanges above do better than we do, before it states the four numbers our own argument rests on.
SafeTrade is one of two tracked homes for Pearl, its USDC/USDT book is deep, and it has no regulator notice of its own, while we have two.
Bybit, OKX and Gate hold MiCA licences in the EU, Bitget's copy trading is the best known in the market, and KuCoin's bots are built in rather than bolted on.
Our case rests on four numbers from the same day: 1,448 coins against 53, a 0.775% average spread against 13.46%, a 9 out of 10 score against 2, and 0% maker on every spot pair against a fee page we could not open.
We are the wrong choice if you need Pearl, if you live in the United States, the United Kingdom or Australia, if MiCA authorization is a condition for you, or if you run bots that would pay our API futures rates.
The MEXC review that names its own weak spot sets out the rest, including the regulator notices repeated in the risk section below.
Which SafeTrade Alternative Fits Which Trader?
Pick MEXC if your trading is spot altcoins and you want a book deep enough that a $3,000 market order costs cents rather than hundreds of dollars in spread, pick a MiCA-licensed venue if EU authorization decides it, and stay on SafeTrade only for the pairs, Pearl above all, that larger exchanges do not list.
Bybit and OKX suit traders who want derivatives depth with an EU licence behind the account.
Bitget suits copy traders who accept the September 2026 incident as priced in, and KuCoin and Gate suit bot users and long-tail collectors respectively.
Keep a SafeTrade account if PRL/USDT or one of its other exclusive pairs is the market you actually trade, and withdraw everything else.
The first step on MEXC is a small limit order on a liquid pair, placed to confirm that the fee line shows 0% before any larger balance arrives.
For US, UK and Australian residents this comparison is information only, and the right venue is one your own regulator licenses.
In the EU and EEA, weigh the fact that MEXC holds no MiCA authorization, and note that Dutch accounts must be offboarded by 31 October 2026 and will close on 16 November 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the best SafeTrade alternatives?
MEXC is our top pick for spot traders, with 0% maker fees, 1,448 CoinGecko-tracked coins and a 0.775% average spread on 6 October 2026.
Bybit, OKX, Bitget, KuCoin and Gate follow, each for a different use case set out above.
Is SafeTrade safe?
On 6 October 2026 CoinGecko gave SafeTrade 2 out of 10, listed no reserve data and no regulatory authorization, and recorded no incident.
No regulator notice we found names safetrade.com, while MEXC has a Seychelles FSA press release and a Dubai VARA notice on record.
What are SafeTrade's trading fees?
Its fee page could not be opened on 6 October 2026, and its CoinGecko listing shows a 0.0015% rate that we could not confirm.
Read the rate on the order ticket itself before trading.
Why is SafeTrade's average spread so wide?
CoinGecko averages every tracked pair, and 27 of SafeTrade's 50 displayed markets traded under $1,000 in a day, with spreads above 10% on several of them.
Its busiest pair, PRL/USDT, showed 0.84%.
Does SafeTrade support fiat deposits?
No, according to its CoinGecko listing, which shows no fiat deposit currencies.
MEXC accepts bank transfer, card, Apple Pay and Google Pay in eligible regions, with no fee on crypto deposits.
Is SafeTrade the same as the SafeTrade on the FCA warning list?
No; the FCA entries concern firms using the name on other domains, and this guide covers the exchange at safetrade.com.
Check the exact domain before you trust any site that calls itself SafeTrade.
How do I move my coins off SafeTrade?
Use a network listed on both sides, start with a token-sized test transfer, and save every transaction ID.
Opening a MEXC account gives you a deposit address for each supported network.
Risk Warning and Regional Notice
Perpetual futures and leverage amplify both gains and losses, and positions can be liquidated for the full margin amount.
At 500x, a move of roughly 0.2% against a position can trigger liquidation, so high tiers suit only experienced traders with strict risk controls.
This article is informational for readers in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, where the platforms discussed may not be available or authorised.
In the EU and EEA, MEXC is not authorized under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).
The Dutch regulator AFM has placed MEXC on its register of non-compliant entities, which ESMA republishes, and readers in those regions should factor this status into any decision.
In a May 26, 2026 press release, the Seychelles Financial Services Authority said the company it identifies as operating the MEXC platform does not hold a licence under its Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2024, that it is initiating enforcement measures, and that the public should exercise caution when dealing with the platform.
In a June 22, 2026 notice of fines, Dubai's Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority said the entity operating as MEXC had served customers in Dubai without a licence from 2022 to April 2026 and onboarded users without meeting UAE know-your-customer requirements, and that it cooperated, complied with cease-and-desist orders and intends to seek a licence.
Nothing here is investment advice, and fees, leverage tiers, and availability change, so confirm current terms on each platform's official pages before trading.
Este artículo es proporcionado por Sarah Chen únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento financiero ni de inversión. Los mercados de criptomonedas implican riesgos significativos. Realiza una investigación independiente o consulta a un profesional calificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión de inversión. Las opiniones expresadas no representan necesariamente las de MEXC o sus afiliados.
Artículos populares
Ver más
MEXC vs SafeTrade, comparativa: ¿qué ocurre con una orden de mercado de 3.000 USD en un libro de órdenes con 540 USD de profundidad?
Para quien opere con órdenes de mercado, MEXC es la mejor opción: el 6 de octubre de 2026, CoinGecko mostraba 9,8 millones de USD en órdenes de venta a menos de un 2% del precio en el libro BTC/USDT d
MEXC vs Websea: ¿qué deben tener en cuenta los traders tras dos interrupciones de las retiradas de Websea en 2026?
En esta comparativa, nuestra elección es MEXC: una única página pública de comisiones con un 0% maker y un 0,05% taker en spot, reservas auditadas por Hacken cada mes y una puntuación de confianza (Tr
MEXC vs Ourbit: ¿qué comisión cero le ahorra más, el 0% en spot o el 0% en órdenes limitadas de futuros?
MEXC es más barato para los futuros de ETH: en ETHUSDT cobra un 0% maker y un 0,01% taker, frente al 0,02% y el 0,04% de Ourbit, de modo que una operación semanal de 10.000 USDT, abierta con una orden
Comparativa MEXC vs Bitvavo: ¿bróker en euros con licencia MiCA o exchange global con 1.450 monedas?
Para los lectores de los Países Bajos, la respuesta es Bitvavo, que cuenta con autorización MiCA de la Autoridad Neerlandesa para los Mercados Financieros (AFM), porque MEXC ha fijado el 16 de noviemb
Artículos relacionados
Ver másMEXC vs SafeTrade, comparativa: ¿qué ocurre con una orden de mercado de 3.000 USD en un libro de órdenes con 540 USD de profundidad?
Para quien opere con órdenes de mercado, MEXC es la mejor opción: el 6 de octubre de 2026, CoinGecko mostraba 9,8 millones de USD en órdenes de venta a menos de un 2% del precio en el libro BTC/USDT d
MEXC vs Websea: ¿qué deben tener en cuenta los traders tras dos interrupciones de las retiradas de Websea en 2026?
En esta comparativa, nuestra elección es MEXC: una única página pública de comisiones con un 0% maker y un 0,05% taker en spot, reservas auditadas por Hacken cada mes y una puntuación de confianza (Tr
MEXC vs Ourbit: ¿qué comisión cero le ahorra más, el 0% en spot o el 0% en órdenes limitadas de futuros?
MEXC es más barato para los futuros de ETH: en ETHUSDT cobra un 0% maker y un 0,01% taker, frente al 0,02% y el 0,04% de Ourbit, de modo que una operación semanal de 10.000 USDT, abierta con una orden
Comparativa MEXC vs Bitvavo: ¿bróker en euros con licencia MiCA o exchange global con 1.450 monedas?
Para los lectores de los Países Bajos, la respuesta es Bitvavo, que cuenta con autorización MiCA de la Autoridad Neerlandesa para los Mercados Financieros (AFM), porque MEXC ha fijado el 16 de noviemb
