The post Stream’s xUSD Faces Scrutiny Over High Leverage and Transparency appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Concerns over Stream’s xUSD leverage and asset backing transparency. xUSD’s 4.1x leverage fuels market concern. Stream’s founder addresses issues, promises transparency. Stream’s xUSD token faces scrutiny after KOL CBB0FE warns of risky leverage levels and asset backing discrepancies, prompting a response from the founder about transparency and collateralization improvements. The event highlights potential systemic risks within DeFi, emphasizing the importance of transparency and proper asset management amid volatile market conditions and heightened community skepticism. xUSD’s 4.1x Leverage Spurs Market Scrutiny CBB0FE’s warning spotlighted Stream’s xUSD, which has approximately $170 million in on-chain assets backing, while borrowing around $530 million. This discrepancy led to criticism about its illiquidity and leverage position, emphasizing risks involved with Morpho/Euler vaults. As CBB0FE, a Key Opinion Leader, stated, “Stream’s xUSD has only about $170 million in on-chain asset backing, yet it has borrowed about $530 million from various lending protocols. This means its leverage is as high as 4.1 times—built on a large number of extremely illiquid positions. This is not ‘yield farming,’ but outright degenerate gambling leverage speculation. Stay away from it. Do not touch anything related to the Morpho/Euler vaults.” Efforts to improve transparency by Stream’s founder include integrating third-party attestors and clarifying that xUSD is not a stablecoin. The reclassification as a tokenized market neutral fund aims to alleviate concerns. However, further developments are expected as the founder pledged to enhance transparency and address miscommunication. Market reactions to the controversy have been mixed, with some seeing it as a call for caution. CBB0FE’s public warning was widely shared, while Stream’s response focused on correcting miscommunication and stressing their insurance fund. Regulation and Analysis: xUSD’s Future Challenges Did you know? Excessive leverage reminiscent of previous collapses, such as the October 2025 (record USD 19 billion in liquidated positions) scenario, underscores the… The post Stream’s xUSD Faces Scrutiny Over High Leverage and Transparency appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Concerns over Stream’s xUSD leverage and asset backing transparency. xUSD’s 4.1x leverage fuels market concern. Stream’s founder addresses issues, promises transparency. Stream’s xUSD token faces scrutiny after KOL CBB0FE warns of risky leverage levels and asset backing discrepancies, prompting a response from the founder about transparency and collateralization improvements. The event highlights potential systemic risks within DeFi, emphasizing the importance of transparency and proper asset management amid volatile market conditions and heightened community skepticism. xUSD’s 4.1x Leverage Spurs Market Scrutiny CBB0FE’s warning spotlighted Stream’s xUSD, which has approximately $170 million in on-chain assets backing, while borrowing around $530 million. This discrepancy led to criticism about its illiquidity and leverage position, emphasizing risks involved with Morpho/Euler vaults. As CBB0FE, a Key Opinion Leader, stated, “Stream’s xUSD has only about $170 million in on-chain asset backing, yet it has borrowed about $530 million from various lending protocols. This means its leverage is as high as 4.1 times—built on a large number of extremely illiquid positions. This is not ‘yield farming,’ but outright degenerate gambling leverage speculation. Stay away from it. Do not touch anything related to the Morpho/Euler vaults.” Efforts to improve transparency by Stream’s founder include integrating third-party attestors and clarifying that xUSD is not a stablecoin. The reclassification as a tokenized market neutral fund aims to alleviate concerns. However, further developments are expected as the founder pledged to enhance transparency and address miscommunication. Market reactions to the controversy have been mixed, with some seeing it as a call for caution. CBB0FE’s public warning was widely shared, while Stream’s response focused on correcting miscommunication and stressing their insurance fund. Regulation and Analysis: xUSD’s Future Challenges Did you know? Excessive leverage reminiscent of previous collapses, such as the October 2025 (record USD 19 billion in liquidated positions) scenario, underscores the…

Stream’s xUSD Faces Scrutiny Over High Leverage and Transparency

Key Points:
  • Concerns over Stream’s xUSD leverage and asset backing transparency.
  • xUSD’s 4.1x leverage fuels market concern.
  • Stream’s founder addresses issues, promises transparency.

Stream’s xUSD token faces scrutiny after KOL CBB0FE warns of risky leverage levels and asset backing discrepancies, prompting a response from the founder about transparency and collateralization improvements.

The event highlights potential systemic risks within DeFi, emphasizing the importance of transparency and proper asset management amid volatile market conditions and heightened community skepticism.

xUSD’s 4.1x Leverage Spurs Market Scrutiny

CBB0FE’s warning spotlighted Stream’s xUSD, which has approximately $170 million in on-chain assets backing, while borrowing around $530 million. This discrepancy led to criticism about its illiquidity and leverage position, emphasizing risks involved with Morpho/Euler vaults. As CBB0FE, a Key Opinion Leader, stated, “Stream’s xUSD has only about $170 million in on-chain asset backing, yet it has borrowed about $530 million from various lending protocols. This means its leverage is as high as 4.1 times—built on a large number of extremely illiquid positions. This is not ‘yield farming,’ but outright degenerate gambling leverage speculation. Stay away from it. Do not touch anything related to the Morpho/Euler vaults.”

Efforts to improve transparency by Stream’s founder include integrating third-party attestors and clarifying that xUSD is not a stablecoin. The reclassification as a tokenized market neutral fund aims to alleviate concerns. However, further developments are expected as the founder pledged to enhance transparency and address miscommunication.

Market reactions to the controversy have been mixed, with some seeing it as a call for caution. CBB0FE’s public warning was widely shared, while Stream’s response focused on correcting miscommunication and stressing their insurance fund.

Regulation and Analysis: xUSD’s Future Challenges

Did you know? Excessive leverage reminiscent of previous collapses, such as the October 2025 (record USD 19 billion in liquidated positions) scenario, underscores the potential tail risks of DeFi protocols.

Ethereum (ETH), as a core platform for DeFi lending, is currently valued at $4,028.46 with a market cap of $486.23 billion. Daily volume has reached $37.61 billion, and while last 24-hour prices slipped by 1.38%, a 4.28% gain is noted over a week. Further statistics and details are provided by CoinMarketCap.

Ethereum(ETH), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 06:30 UTC on October 29, 2025. Source: CoinMarketCap

Insights from Coincu Research suggest possible regulatory evaluations given the complexities of xUSD’s leverage, enhancing oversight could emerge for similar DeFi products as risk management becomes a priority.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/xusd-leverage-transparency-concerns/

Market Opportunity
Streamflow Logo
Streamflow Price(STREAM)
$0.01666
$0.01666$0.01666
-0.23%
USD
Streamflow (STREAM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan

Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan

The firm has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to launch a $4 billion at-the-market (ATM) equity program, […] The post Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 04:15
Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Payments has joined the Open Intents Framework as a core contributor, working alongside Ethereum Foundation and other major players. The initiative aims to simplify complex multi-chain interactions through automated solver technology. The post Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework appeared first on Coinspeaker.
Share
Coinspeaker2025/09/18 02:43