The White House pushed for a breakthrough on stablecoin yield negotiations for the CLARITY Act this weekend. It did not happen. Instead, fresh reports from sourcesThe White House pushed for a breakthrough on stablecoin yield negotiations for the CLARITY Act this weekend. It did not happen. Instead, fresh reports from sources

CLARITY Act Still Faces Push From Banks as Yield Fight Stalls Deal

2026/02/28 09:19
3 min read

The White House pushed for a breakthrough on stablecoin yield negotiations for the CLARITY Act this weekend. It did not happen. Instead, fresh reports from sources close to the talks suggest the crypto market structure bill remains far from a final deal. 

Banking representatives and crypto lobbyists are still divided over whether stablecoins can generate yield for users. That dispute continues to block progress in the Senate.

CLARITY Act Still Faces Push From Banks as Yield Fight Stalls Deal

The CLARITY Act Nowhere Near a Resolution?

According to Eleanor Terrett, banking-side sources described the negotiations bluntly. Draft language exists, but the sides are “not close.” 

Other banking trade groups pushed back on claims the talks are collapsing, saying discussions are ongoing and input on draft text continues.

The split narrative reflects how fragile the negotiations have become.

Where the Bill Stands Now

The House passed the CLARITY Act in July 2025 with bipartisan support. The bill aims to define when digital assets fall under SEC oversight and when they qualify as commodities under the CFTC. It also establishes registration rules for exchanges, brokers, and custodians.

After clearing the House, the bill moved to the Senate Banking Committee. There, it stalled.

No markup has been completed. No floor vote is scheduled.

The legislation remains stuck in committee.

Stablecoin Yield Is the Flashpoint

Originally, the bill focused on regulatory clarity between the SEC and CFTC. But in early 2026, the fight shifted to stablecoins.

Senate negotiators introduced draft language that would restrict interest or yield payments tied to stablecoin holdings. Banks support tighter limits. They argue that yield-bearing stablecoins could function like unregulated bank deposits.

Crypto firms strongly oppose that view. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has publicly argued that stablecoins can generate yield responsibly and that banning rewards would harm innovation.

That disagreement now threatens the broader market structure framework.

White House Pressure, But No Breakthrough

The White House has convened meetings between banks and crypto firms in recent weeks. Officials reportedly wanted a deal on yield before March.

However, sources say key language remains unresolved.

Bank trade groups such as the American Bankers Association and the Independent Community Bankers of America have reportedly rejected claims that negotiations are collapsing. Still, there is no finalized text.

What Is Still Unresolved

Four core issues remain:

  • Whether stablecoin rewards count as prohibited interest
  • How sharply to limit exchange incentives
  • The final boundary between SEC and CFTC authority
  • The scope of obligations for DeFi developers

Until yield language is settled, broader market structure reforms cannot move forward.

When Will the CLARITY Act Pass?

The next key step is a Senate Banking Committee markup. No date has been announced.

If negotiators narrow differences in March, a committee vote could follow later in the month. If talks drag on, the bill risks slipping deeper into election-year politics.

For now, the CLARITY Act remains alive — but stalled.

The question is no longer whether Congress wants crypto rules. It is whether banks and crypto firms can agree on who controls stablecoin economics.

Market Opportunity
The AI Prophecy Logo
The AI Prophecy Price(ACT)
$0.01352
$0.01352$0.01352
+3.68%
USD
The AI Prophecy (ACT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Top 5 Cryptocurrencies for Long-Term Investment in 2026: Expert Analysis

Top 5 Cryptocurrencies for Long-Term Investment in 2026: Expert Analysis

Discover the top 5 cryptocurrencies for long-term investment in 2026. Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Chainlink, and Avalanche lead with institutional backing. The post
Share
Blockonomi2026/03/01 19:48
Tindig Pilipinas backs clergy’s complaint to fast-track Sara Duterte impeachment

Tindig Pilipinas backs clergy’s complaint to fast-track Sara Duterte impeachment

'Consolidating our support behind the third complaint will strengthen our position and help move the case forward to the Senate impeachment court,' Tindig Pilipinas
Share
Rappler2026/03/01 19:47