The post US Banks Laundered $312B, But Crypto Gets the Blame appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The money was funneled through partnerships with Mexican cartels and linked to schemes ranging from drug trafficking to $53.7 billion in suspicious real estate deals. Despite this, crypto faces disproportionate scrutiny from lawmakers like Elizabeth Warren, even though illicit crypto activity accounts for less than 1% of transactions. At the same time, the CFTC is rolling out Nasdaq’s surveillance technology to monitor insider trading and manipulation in crypto markets, while the Treasury explores identity-embedded smart contracts in DeFi. Supporters say these measures protect markets, but critics warn they risk undermining decentralization and creating a digital surveillance state. Banks Exposed But Crypto in the Crosshairs A new report from the US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) revealed that American banks were responsible for laundering an estimated $312 billion for Chinese money laundering networks between 2020 and 2024. The advisory was released on Thursday, and it analyzed more than 137,000 Bank Secrecy Act reports covering the four-year period and found that an average of over $62 billion per year flowed through the US banking system from Chinese criminal organizations.  These networks have become closely intertwined with Mexico-based drug cartels, and they formed a mutually beneficial relationship: cartels need to clean their US dollar drug proceeds, while Chinese gangs seek access to US dollars to evade China’s strict currency controls. According to FinCEN Director Andrea Gacki, these networks are not only laundering drug money but are also deeply involved in a range of other criminal schemes, including human trafficking, healthcare fraud, elder abuse, and smuggling. They have also been linked to suspicious real estate transactions worth $53.7 billion. This scale of illicit activity proves just how traditional banking systems are still at the heart of global money laundering operations as they provide a shadow financial infrastructure that organized crime syndicates exploit worldwide. FinCEN… The post US Banks Laundered $312B, But Crypto Gets the Blame appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The money was funneled through partnerships with Mexican cartels and linked to schemes ranging from drug trafficking to $53.7 billion in suspicious real estate deals. Despite this, crypto faces disproportionate scrutiny from lawmakers like Elizabeth Warren, even though illicit crypto activity accounts for less than 1% of transactions. At the same time, the CFTC is rolling out Nasdaq’s surveillance technology to monitor insider trading and manipulation in crypto markets, while the Treasury explores identity-embedded smart contracts in DeFi. Supporters say these measures protect markets, but critics warn they risk undermining decentralization and creating a digital surveillance state. Banks Exposed But Crypto in the Crosshairs A new report from the US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) revealed that American banks were responsible for laundering an estimated $312 billion for Chinese money laundering networks between 2020 and 2024. The advisory was released on Thursday, and it analyzed more than 137,000 Bank Secrecy Act reports covering the four-year period and found that an average of over $62 billion per year flowed through the US banking system from Chinese criminal organizations.  These networks have become closely intertwined with Mexico-based drug cartels, and they formed a mutually beneficial relationship: cartels need to clean their US dollar drug proceeds, while Chinese gangs seek access to US dollars to evade China’s strict currency controls. According to FinCEN Director Andrea Gacki, these networks are not only laundering drug money but are also deeply involved in a range of other criminal schemes, including human trafficking, healthcare fraud, elder abuse, and smuggling. They have also been linked to suspicious real estate transactions worth $53.7 billion. This scale of illicit activity proves just how traditional banking systems are still at the heart of global money laundering operations as they provide a shadow financial infrastructure that organized crime syndicates exploit worldwide. FinCEN…

US Banks Laundered $312B, But Crypto Gets the Blame

The money was funneled through partnerships with Mexican cartels and linked to schemes ranging from drug trafficking to $53.7 billion in suspicious real estate deals. Despite this, crypto faces disproportionate scrutiny from lawmakers like Elizabeth Warren, even though illicit crypto activity accounts for less than 1% of transactions. At the same time, the CFTC is rolling out Nasdaq’s surveillance technology to monitor insider trading and manipulation in crypto markets, while the Treasury explores identity-embedded smart contracts in DeFi. Supporters say these measures protect markets, but critics warn they risk undermining decentralization and creating a digital surveillance state.

Banks Exposed But Crypto in the Crosshairs

A new report from the US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) revealed that American banks were responsible for laundering an estimated $312 billion for Chinese money laundering networks between 2020 and 2024. The advisory was released on Thursday, and it analyzed more than 137,000 Bank Secrecy Act reports covering the four-year period and found that an average of over $62 billion per year flowed through the US banking system from Chinese criminal organizations. 

These networks have become closely intertwined with Mexico-based drug cartels, and they formed a mutually beneficial relationship: cartels need to clean their US dollar drug proceeds, while Chinese gangs seek access to US dollars to evade China’s strict currency controls.

According to FinCEN Director Andrea Gacki, these networks are not only laundering drug money but are also deeply involved in a range of other criminal schemes, including human trafficking, healthcare fraud, elder abuse, and smuggling. They have also been linked to suspicious real estate transactions worth $53.7 billion. This scale of illicit activity proves just how traditional banking systems are still at the heart of global money laundering operations as they provide a shadow financial infrastructure that organized crime syndicates exploit worldwide.

FinCEN advisory

Despite these revelations, cryptocurrencies have been unfairly targeted as a primary enabler of money laundering. Politicians like Elizabeth Warren repeatedly pushed for stricter regulations on crypto by claiming bad actors are increasingly using digital assets for illicit purposes. 

However, the numbers suggest a different reality. While the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime estimates that more than $2 trillion is laundered globally every year, the entire crypto sector’s illicit volumes totaled just $189 billion over the past five years, according to Chainalysis. This figure is less than 1% of total crypto activity. A similar conclusion was reached by TRM Labs’ Angela Ang, who pointed out that FinCEN’s findings shed some light on how entrenched and expansive underground banking networks are compared to the relatively minor role of crypto in global money laundering.

The report offers a stark reminder that while crypto often faces political scrutiny, the bulk of illicit financial activity continues to thrive in traditional banking systems.

CFTC Taps Nasdaq to Watch Crypto Markets

Regulators are also making it a top priority to make crypto safer. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is adopting a new financial surveillance tool that was developed by Nasdaq to replace its outdated 1990s-era infrastructure. 

The system is designed to detect market abuse like insider trading and manipulation, and will also be applied to cryptocurrency markets. Tony Sio, Nasdaq’s head of regulatory strategy and innovation, explained that the software relies on tailored algorithms that can spot patterns specific to digital asset markets. It offers real-time analysis of order book data across crypto trading venues and provides cross-market analytics that link activities between traditional and digital asset markets. The CFTC will feed the system data gathered through its regulatory authority to improve oversight and enforcement.

Announcement from the CFTC

Supporters argue that tools like these are vital to preventing financial crime and ensuring the integrity of markets. On the other hand, critics warn that they risk creating a digital surveillance state. Privacy advocates in the crypto industry caution that such measures could undermine the open, permissionless nature of blockchain-based finance.

Concerns are especially pronounced in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector, where the US Treasury Department is considering requiring embedded digital identification checks in smart contracts as part of new anti-money laundering measures. The proposal follows directives in the White House’s July crypto report, which called for stronger tax enforcement, revised market structures, and new identity standards. Among the recommendations were updated Know Your Customer rules for digital assets, as well as revisions to existing National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) digital identity guidelines.

Recommendations from the White House report

These potential requirements attracted criticism from people in the industry who believe they could fundamentally alter DeFi. Mamadou Kwidjim Toure, CEO of investment platform Ubuntu Tribe, believes that embedding government-approved identity credentials into decentralized protocols will erode the neutrality and openness that define them.

Source: https://coinpaper.com/10784/us-banks-laundered-312-b-but-crypto-gets-the-blame

Market Opportunity
RealLink Logo
RealLink Price(REAL)
$0.07461
$0.07461$0.07461
+0.44%
USD
RealLink (REAL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Here’s How Consumers May Benefit From Lower Interest Rates

Here’s How Consumers May Benefit From Lower Interest Rates

The post Here’s How Consumers May Benefit From Lower Interest Rates appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Federal Reserve on Wednesday opted to ease interest rates for the first time in months, leading the way for potentially lower mortgage rates, bond yields and a likely boost to cryptocurrency over the coming weeks. Average long-term mortgage rates dropped to their lowest levels in months ahead of the central bank’s policy shift. Copyright{2018} The Associated Press. All rights reserved. Key Facts The central bank’s policymaking panel voted this week to lower interest rates, which have sat between 4.25% and 4.5% since December, to a new range of 4% and 4.25%. How Will Lower Interest Rates Impact Mortgage Rates? Mortgage rates tend to fall before and during a period of interest rate cuts: The average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage dropped to 6.35% from 6.5% last week, the lowest level since October 2024, mortgage buyer Freddie Mac reported. Borrowing costs on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages also dropped to 5.5% from 5.6% as they neared the year-ago rate of 5.27%. When the Federal Reserve lowered the funds rate to between 0% and 0.25% during the pandemic, 30-year mortgage rates hit record lows between 2.7% and 3% by the end of 2020, according to data published by Freddie Mac. Consumers who refinanced their mortgages in 2020 saved about $5.3 billion annually as rates dropped, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Similarly, mortgage rates spiked around 7% as interest rates were hiked in 2022 and 2023, though mortgage rates appeared to react within weeks of the Fed opting to cut or raise rates. How Do Treasury Bonds Respond To Lower Interest Rates? Long-term Treasury yields are more directly influenced by interest rates, as lower rates tend to result in lower yields. When the Fed pushed rates to near zero during the pandemic, 10-year Treasury yields fell to an all-time low of 0.5%. As…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:59
Two new wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC from Binance within 12 hours, worth $13.5 million.

Two new wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC from Binance within 12 hours, worth $13.5 million.

PANews reported on December 28 that, according to Lookonchain monitoring, two newly created wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC (US$13.5 million) from Binance in the past
Share
PANews2025/12/28 09:13
Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30