FinTelegram has published an enhanced 28‑page Compliance Report on the open banking infrastructure provider Yapily operated by Yapily Connect Ltd (UK) and YapilyFinTelegram has published an enhanced 28‑page Compliance Report on the open banking infrastructure provider Yapily operated by Yapily Connect Ltd (UK) and Yapily

Yapily: Compliance Report Highlights Google Partnership and Offshore Casino Exposure

FinTelegram has published an enhanced 28‑page Compliance Report on the open banking infrastructure provider Yapily operated by Yapily Connect Ltd (UK) and Yapily Connect UAB (Lithuania), analysing the company’s high‑profile partnership with Google and its problematic role as open‑banking infrastructure for illegal offshore casinos. The report is now available for professional download and will be updated quarterly.​

Yapily Under Intensified Scrutiny

Yapily positions itself as a leading open‑banking payment institution in the UK and EU, licensed in the UK by the FCA and in Lithuania by the Bank of Lithuania. In late 2024 and 2025, the company gained additional visibility through a strategic partnership with Google to power bank account verification services for business customers in Europe, a move widely covered in the fintech and tech press. This cooperation significantly raises Yapily’s public profile and systemic relevance in the European open‑banking ecosystem.​

FinTelegram findings: Yapily rails into illegal offshore casinos

FinTelegram’s recent investigations documented that Yapily’s open‑banking rails are routed via the Bulgarian intermediary Contiant into illegal offshore online casinos, turning Yapily into a critical technical layer in unlicensed gambling payment flows. This raises serious questions about Yapily’s customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and sector‑specific risk controls for iGaming and high‑risk merchants.

Read our reports on Yapily here.

These findings are likely to attract increasing attention from UK and EU regulators, especially in the context of tightening expectations around gambling payments and open‑banking risk management.​

Scope of the Yapily Compliance Report

The new FinTelegram Compliance Report covers the period January 2025 to January 2026 and provides:​

  • A regulatory profile of Yapily Connect Ltd (FCA‑authorised payment institution) and Yapily Connect UAB (Bank of Lithuania‑licensed payment institution).​
  • A mapping of the ownership and funding structure after Yapily’s venture rounds led by Sapphire Ventures, Lakestar and others.​
  • An assessment of Yapily’s MiCA‑relevance and broader EU regulatory posture, including its Google partnership and exposure to offshore gambling flows via Contiant.​
Download the full Yapily Compliance Report here.

The report is prepared for compliance officers, EU merchants, regulators, and investigative journalists and is available for download in professional formats (Word/PDF) via the FinTelegram case register (Case ID: YAPILY‑2026‑Q1).​

Call for whistleblowers and industry insiders

FinTelegram is actively seeking additional documentation from:​

  • Current and former Yapily employees
  • Partner banks, PSPs, and open‑banking intermediaries
  • Merchants and affiliates in the iGaming and high‑risk sectors

Whistleblowers, compliance officers, and affected customers who have internal documents, screenshots, contracts, payment flow descriptions, or other evidence related to Yapily, Contiant, and connected gambling operators are invited to securely reach out to FinTelegram’s whistleblower channels. All information will be handled confidentially in line with journalistic standards and data‑protection requirements.​

Share Information via Whistle42
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Zwitserse bankgigant UBS wil crypto beleggen mogelijk maken

Zwitserse bankgigant UBS wil crypto beleggen mogelijk maken

De grootste vermogensbeheerder ter wereld, UBS, maakt zich op om een stap te zetten richting crypto. Volgens bronnen binnen de bank kijkt het Zwitserse concern
Share
Coinstats2026/01/24 02:48
Trump Nears Decision on New Federal Reserve Chair

Trump Nears Decision on New Federal Reserve Chair

The post Trump Nears Decision on New Federal Reserve Chair appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Trump nears decision on Federal Reserve Chair, evaluating
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/24 02:53