Portugal has ordered Polymarket, the world’s largest crypto prediction market, to shut down for local users over illegal political betting. The post Portugal ordersPortugal has ordered Polymarket, the world’s largest crypto prediction market, to shut down for local users over illegal political betting. The post Portugal orders

Portugal orders closure of Polymarket for Their Residents

When the Biggest Prediction Market Is Shut Out, the Bets Don’t Disappear

Yesterday, I found myself browsing a prediction market on Predictbase, a relatively new platform I have used in the past.

The market was titled Portugal Presidential Election Winner, and at the time of writing it had already seen over $6,000 in volume — not bad at all for a small, lesser-known site.

It’s a neat example of what prediction markets do best: aggregating sentiment, speculation, and conviction into a single price that claims to say something meaningful about the future.

What made the moment ironic was what came next. Later that same day, I came across the news that Portugal had ordered the closure of Polymarket, the world’s largest crypto-based prediction market, giving it 48 hours to shut down operations for Portuguese users.

Predictbase and platforms like it are small fry compared to Polymarket’s scale and liquidity, but the contrast was striking.

Portugal may be forcing the closure of the biggest player in the space, yet for anyone looking to place similar bets, alternatives are only a search away.

The drain, so to speak, may have been plugged, but over time, the water will spill elsewhere.

Portugal Moves to Shut Down Betting at Polymarket

Portugal’s gambling regulator issued a formal order requiring Polymarket to cease offering services to users in the country.

The regulator’s position is straightforward: Polymarket does not hold a Portuguese gambling license, and betting on political events is prohibited under national law.

From the state’s perspective, prediction markets tied to elections are not innovative financial tools — they are unlicensed gambling products.

The timing of the enforcement is important. Regulators were reportedly alarmed by a sharp increase in activity surrounding Portugal’s recent presidential election, including millions of euros wagered shortly before official results were released.

That late surge raised concerns about insider information, exit poll leaks, and broader election-integrity risks — issues that regulators treat with particular sensitivity.

Polymarket was given a short compliance window and warned that failure to comply could result in ISP-level blocking.

While the platform may remain technically accessible for some users in the short term, the message from authorities is clear: political prediction markets are not welcome under Portugal’s current legal framework.

What This Means for Portuguese Users

For users based in Portugal, the practical impact is uncertainty. If ISP-level blocks are enforced, accessing Polymarket through normal channels may become impossible.

Even if tech-savvy users find workarounds, opening new positions could become risky, and withdrawing funds may become more complicated as the platform operates outside local regulatory protection.

Unlike licensed gambling operators, unregulated platforms are not subject to consumer safeguards or dispute mechanisms under Portuguese law.

If something goes wrong, users have little formal recourse. In effect, the legal risk shifts almost entirely onto the bettor.

For governments, shutting these markets down is often easier than attempting to supervise them.

The Whack-a-Mole Problem. Portugal’s action highlights a recurring pattern in the prediction market space.

Blocking one platform does not remove the demand. It simply redirects it.

Smaller sites like Predictbase, offshore operators, or fully decentralized protocols can replicate similar markets with minimal friction. Users who are motivated will search, adapt, and migrate.

From a regulatory standpoint, this creates a familiar dilemma: strict enforcement reduces visibility and control, but permissive regulation risks legitimising a category of betting many governments are uncomfortable allowing in the first place.

final thoughts

Prediction markets sit in an awkward middle ground. Supporters argue they are powerful tools for aggregating information and forecasting real-world events more accurately than polls or pundits.

Critics see them as speculative gambling products dressed up in financial language. Portugal has clearly chosen the second interpretation.

As my experience with Prediction markets show, the ecosystem does not disappear when a major platform is removed. It fragments, reshapes, and continues elsewhere.

Polymarket may be shut out of Portugal, but the bets themselves are unlikely to disappear.

The post Portugal orders closure of Polymarket for Their Residents appeared first on BitcoinChaser.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

Ripple’s native token XRP is still battling out with the bears at the $1.90 territory on Friday afternoon. The support-turned-resistance at $1.90 is particularly
Share
Coinstats2026/01/24 03:25
Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Metaplanet Inc., the Japanese public company known for its bitcoin treasury, is launching a Miami subsidiary to run a dedicated derivatives and income strategy aimed at turning holdings into steady, U.S.-based cash flow. Japanese Bitcoin Treasury Player Metaplanet Opens Miami Outpost The new entity, Metaplanet Income Corp., sits under Metaplanet Holdings, Inc. and is based […]
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:32
The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The post The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Healthy competition drives innovation and better products for consumers; it is at the center of American economic leadership. Unfortunately, now that the bipartisan GENIUS Act has been signed into law, major legacy financial institutions seem to be having second thoughts about the innovations that stablecoins can bring to financial markets. Bank lobbying groups and public affairs teams have been peppering Congress with complaints about the law, urging members to reopen debate and introduce changes to the legislation that will ensure the stablecoin market doesn’t grow too quickly, protecting banks’ profits and stifling consumer choice. This reactionary response is both overblown and unnecessary. What legacy financial firms should do instead is embrace competition and offer exciting new products and services that consumers want, not try to kneecap emerging players through anti-innovation rules and regulations. The GENIUS Act was carefully designed with a thorough bipartisan process to strengthen consumer safeguards, ensure regulatory oversight, and preserve financial stability. Efforts to roll back its provisions are less about protecting families and more about protecting entrenched banking interests from the competition that helps ensure the U.S. banking system stays the strongest and most innovative in the world. Critics warn that allowing stablecoins to provide rewards could lead to massive deposit outflows from community banks, with figures as high as $6.6 trillion cited. But closer examination shows this fear is unfounded. A July 2025 analysis by consulting firm Charles River Associates found no statistically significant relationship between stablecoin adoption and community bank deposit outflows. In fact, the overwhelming majority of stablecoin reserves remain in the traditional financial system — either in commercial bank accounts or in short-term Treasuries — where they continue to support liquidity and credit in the broader U.S. economy. The dire estimates rely on unrealistic assumptions that every dollar of stablecoin issuance permanently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:39