Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman postponed a planned markup of bipartisan crypto legislation to late January, citing the need for additional timeSenate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman postponed a planned markup of bipartisan crypto legislation to late January, citing the need for additional time

Senate Delays Crypto Market Structure Bill to Secure Bipartisan Support

Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman postponed a planned markup of bipartisan crypto legislation to late January, citing the need for additional time to finalize remaining policy details and ensure broad congressional support.

The delay follows weekend negotiations with Democratic lead Senator Cory Booker on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which divides regulatory authority between the SEC and CFTC while establishing frameworks for stablecoin yields, DeFi protections, and digital asset classifications.

The postponement adds uncertainty to legislation already facing political headwinds as the 2026 midterm elections approach, with some analysts warning passage could slip to 2027 despite strong backing from the Trump administration and newly appointed SEC Chair Paul Atkins, who called this “a big week for crypto” while urging Congress to bring digital asset markets “out of the regulatory gray zone.

Banks Challenge Stablecoin Yield Provisions in Final Negotiations

Traditional banking groups intensified lobbying efforts to restrict stablecoin rewards beyond the GENIUS Act’s framework, which permits third-party platforms to offer incentives while barring direct interest payments from issuers.

The latest Senate Banking Committee draft, released late Monday after what sources described as a “doozy” of a day, prohibits companies from paying interest solely for holding balances but allows rewards tied to account opening, transaction activity, staking, liquidity provision, collateral deposits, or governance participation.

The American Bankers Association warned in a recent letter that “if billions are displaced from community bank lending, small businesses, farmers, students, and home buyers in towns like ours will suffer,” arguing that crypto exchanges cannot replicate FDIC-insured products or fill lending gaps from deposit outflows.

As a result, Coinbase threatened to withdraw support if Senate negotiators insert restrictions beyond enhanced disclosure requirements, with Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad contending that “undermining the supremacy of the USD has been a longstanding goal of the PRC—the Senate banning rewards would be a big assist to China’s efforts,” noting Beijing announced plans to pay interest on its digital yuan starting January 1, 2026.

Stablecoin rewards represent critical revenue for Coinbase, which shares interest income from USDC reserves with Circle Internet Group and offers 3.5% yields on Coinbase One balances, with Bloomberg projecting the exchange’s total stablecoin revenue reached $1.3 billion in 2025.

Jake Chervinsky of Variant Fund questioned the yield restrictions, stating, “there are a few things left that could blow up the market structure bill, and stablecoin yield is one of them,” adding, “what does stablecoin yield have to do with market structure, you ask? Good question! NOTHING. Except the banks have influence and they want their regulatory moat back.

Legislative Timeline Faces Midterm Election Pressure

Three Democratic senators, Chris Van Hollen, Tina Smith, and Jack Reed, sent a letter to Banking Committee leadership demanding a full hearing before Thursday’s markup, criticizing the lack of text “just two days before the markup, calling the timeline inadequate for voting on ‘the most significant law considered by the committee this century.’

The lawmakers noted that neither the full committee nor the public had seen any text resembling the legislation affecting 68 million American crypto owners and the $3 trillion digital asset market by 6 p.m. Monday, ahead of the 10 a.m. Thursday vote.

Due to growing bipartisan opposition and pressure from bankers, TD Cowen warned that the 2026 midterms could delay passage until 2027, with Senate Democrats potentially withholding support as lawmakers position for the next cycle.

Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Nathan Dean even suggested the markup’s lack of bipartisan support may push odds of first-half passage below 70%, while full implementation could extend to 2029 depending on election outcomes that reshape congressional control.

Notably, the new legislation includes an “ETF safe harbor” automatically classifying tokens as non-securities if they were principal assets of exchange-traded products listed on national securities exchanges as of January 1, treating major altcoins identically to BTC and ETH from day one.

Bill Hughes of Consensys also noted the bill “really does protect non-custodial trading interfaces” by creating regulatory perimeters based on custody and control rather than interface popularity, stating “if users trade through their own keys, you’re software” versus “if users trade through their own keys, you’re software.

SEC Chair Paul Atkins expressed full support for congressional action, writing, “passing bipartisan market structure legislation will help us future-proof against rogue regulators, ensuring that we achieve President Trump’s goal to make the U.S. the crypto capital of the world,” while anticipating the president would sign legislation “in the coming months.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15