The SlowMist blockchain security outfit shared its report of the audit on the hack that drained $26 million from the Truebit Protocol.  According to the report,The SlowMist blockchain security outfit shared its report of the audit on the hack that drained $26 million from the Truebit Protocol.  According to the report,

Here's how the Truebit hack happened

The SlowMist blockchain security outfit shared its report of the audit on the hack that drained $26 million from the Truebit Protocol. 

According to the report, the root cause of the attack was that the addition operation in the numerator of the Purchase contract’s price calculation did not use the SafeMath library for overflow protection. 

How did the Truebit hack happen? 

SlowMist’s audit report revealed that Truebit’s contract was reportedly compiled with Solidity 0.6.10, and the native + operator does not include overflow checks. The attacker was able to wreak so much havoc by crafting a specific minting amount, which triggered the addition operation to exceed the maximum value of uint256 and wrap around. 

The function made the Price = 0, enabling near-zero-cost token minting and arbitrage, which the hacker quickly took advantage of to drain 8,535 ETH (~$26.44 million). The report ended with advice from the SlowMist team. 

“The SlowMist security team recommends that for contracts compiled with Solidity versions below 0.8.0, developers should ensure that all arithmetic operations are protected using the SafeMath library to prevent logic vulnerabilities caused by integer overflows,” it read. 

The Truebit team has acknowledged the hack, identifying the affected smart contract and advising the public to avoid interacting with it until further notice. 

“We are in contact with law enforcement and taking all available measures to address the situation. We will share updates through our official channels as they become available,” they claimed. 

One day later, the team claimed to be working hard to address the incident and that it had “engaged additional resources to strengthen tracing and recovery,” while promising updates through official channels.

In the comments section of the post, community members offered various next steps to the team, with a majority claiming the protocol had become unusable, that it was unlikely they would recover the funds, and needed to admit that. 

Commentators have noted that full recovery could be impossible. 

The $TRU token is still down 100% with zero percentage change and virtually no trading volume reported across major platforms since the hack, which reflects a complete lack of faith in the potential of the project to bounce back.

Truebit hack gave Uniswap brief boost 

Cryptopolitan reported on January 8 that Uniswap recorded over $1.4 million in daily trading fee capture revenue, the highest the platform has ever recorded since it was established. 

However, that record number came with a caveat. According to a Dune dashboard created by an analyst named Marcov, nearly $1.3 million of those fees came directly from trades related to Truebit’s TRU token. 

Marcov has now filtered out those values from the live dashboard because the token value has dropped to zero and won’t be claimed and used to burn UNI.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Market Opportunity
The Root Network Logo
The Root Network Price(ROOT)
$0.000212
$0.000212$0.000212
-0.93%
USD
The Root Network (ROOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

REX Shares’ Solana staking ETF sees $10M inflows, AUM tops $289M for first time

REX Shares’ Solana staking ETF sees $10M inflows, AUM tops $289M for first time

The post REX Shares’ Solana staking ETF sees $10M inflows, AUM tops $289M for first time appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways REX Shares’ Solana staking ETF saw $10 million in inflows in one day. Total inflows over the past three days amount to $23 million. REX Shares’ Solana staking ETF recorded $10 million in inflows yesterday, bringing total additions to $23 million over the past three days. The fund’s assets under management climbed above $289.0 million for the first time. The SSK ETF is the first U.S. exchange-traded fund focused on Solana staking. Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/rex-shares-solana-staking-etf-aum-289m/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:34
pump.fun transferred another 148 million USDC and USDT obtained through the ICO sale of $PUMP to Kraken.

pump.fun transferred another 148 million USDC and USDT obtained through the ICO sale of $PUMP to Kraken.

PANews reported on January 13 that, according to on-chain analyst Yu Jin, pump.fun transferred another 148 million USDC and USDT obtained through the ICO sale of
Share
PANews2026/01/13 08:20
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58