With evaluation failures and payout issues on the rise, CTI urges firms to adopt fairer, more transparent practices. DUBAI, UAE, Dec. 30, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — AsWith evaluation failures and payout issues on the rise, CTI urges firms to adopt fairer, more transparent practices. DUBAI, UAE, Dec. 30, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — As

CTI Calls For Higher Standards in Prop Firm Evaluations

With evaluation failures and payout issues on the rise, CTI urges firms to adopt fairer, more transparent practices.

DUBAI, UAE, Dec. 30, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — As more traders turn to prop firms for funding and opportunity, City Traders Imperium (CTI) is warning the industry about evaluation practices that set traders up to fail. The firm is calling for an industry-wide shift away from “gotcha” culture – a system that quietly traps traders with hidden rules, inconsistent payouts, and unclear performance criteria.

CTI’s stance follows a growing wave of concern from traders and regulators. Recent high-profile cases have underscored just how vulnerable traders can be in a space with limited oversight, raising important questions about transparency, accountability, and business practices across the sector.

Ambiguous terms and payout delays are among the most common complaints. According to Traders Union, most traders fail to complete evaluations, and even those who succeed often exit within a few months due to stress and unclear rules. These issues are especially damaging for newer traders who pay high challenge fees with the expectation of a fair opportunity.

While many prop firms present evaluations as a fair path to funding, some undermine that promise with hidden rules and inconsistent criteria that derail traders before they get a chance to prove themselves. From intraday equity drawdowns that punish unrealized gains to ambiguous terms that shift after sign-up, the trader experience can become a test of policy navigation.

“We believe funding should be earned, but the playing field has to be fair,” said Martin Najat, Co-Founder of City Traders Imperium. “Traders deserve to know what they’re signing up for, and they deserve to be evaluated on skill, not trick questions.”

CTI is encouraging firms to adopt straightforward standards: clear evaluation rules, transparent profit splits, fast payouts, and honest disclosure about how challenges are run. These aren’t difficult to implement, but they remain elusive across much of the industry.

“Some firms treat failure as the business model,” Najat added. “Traders pay to participate, but then run into hidden traps – rules that shift without notice, technical limitations, or sudden disqualifications that only appear once profits are on the table.”

In addition to structural issues within prop firm evaluations, CTI notes that part of the problem also stems from trader behaviour itself. A growing number of participants approach evaluations with gambling-style tactics, chasing high-risk setups or attempting to exploit loopholes that are explicitly prohibited within the industry.

This not only undermines their own chances of success but also places additional strain on prop firms, contributing to an environment where rules tighten and trust erodes. Such behaviour reinforces a cycle that harms the entire industry, making it even more difficult for genuine, disciplined traders to thrive.

The firm also points to the rise of payout marketing as a distraction from the real issue: whether firms consistently honor their obligations. CTI notes a growing trend among prop firms to highlight fast payouts in their marketing – a shift that reflects increasing pressure for transparency and reliability.

For CTI, fair evaluations are the foundation of long-term success – not just for traders, but for the prop trading industry itself. The company emphasizes structured growth, supportive feedback, and clear communication throughout its programs.

Learn more at: citytradersimperium.com 

About City Traders Imperium

City Traders Imperium (CTI) is a proprietary trading firm that provides funded trading programs designed to support long-term trader development. Since 2018, CTI has offered transparent evaluations, flexible capital allocations, and structured growth opportunities.

Logo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2773958/CTI_Logo.jpg

Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cti-calls-for-higher-standards-in-prop-firm-evaluations-302650382.html

SOURCE CTI

Market Opportunity
RISE Logo
RISE Price(RISE)
$0.005324
$0.005324$0.005324
-3.69%
USD
RISE (RISE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

While Shiba Inu (SHIB) continues to build its ecosystem and PEPE holds onto its viral roots, a new contender, Layer […] The post Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 01:13
The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board plans to study in 2026 whether crypto assets such as stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents.

The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board plans to study in 2026 whether crypto assets such as stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents.

PANews reported on December 31 that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) plans to study in 2026 whether certain crypto assets can be classified as cash
Share
PANews2025/12/31 16:50