MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade. In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric […]MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade. In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric […]

Meat importers seek expansion of pork MAV to allow new entrants

MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade.

In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric tons (MT) limits opportunities for new entrants and fails to reflect current market needs.

According to MITA, pre-MAV, pork production in 1994 was roughly 1 million MT (MMT) and peaked at 1.9 MMT in 2019. Following the African Swine Fever (ASF) outbreak, production reverted to 1994 levels despite an almost doubling of the Philippine population.

MITA said the hog industry’s recovery will take years and that the proposed reallocation, particularly the portion earmarked for state-owned enterprises, which already import duty-free, will not increase total supply.

The MAV is a commitment to the World Trade Organization to allow certain quantities of goods for import. Shipments within the MAV quota are charged a most favored nation tariff, while volumes beyond that pay higher rates.

Pork shipments within the MAV quota are subject to a 15% tariff, while volumes exceeding the MAV are charged the regular 25% rate.

Agriculture Secretary Francisco Tiu Laurel, Jr. has said that the department will review MAV rules after finding that only a handful of importers cornered a significant portion of the quota. MITA said the DA’s proposed rules would allocate 50% of import quotas to processors, 30% to state-owned enterprises, and 20% to other sectors. 

MITA noted that the problem lies not with the existing allocation scheme but with the overall MAV available for importers.

“Those without quota often argue that the system is unfair to them… The challenge arises when new entrants seek to participate but available volumes are insufficient,” MITA President Emeritus Jesus C. Cham said in the letter.

The DA said it intends to maintain the total MAV under the new scheme as increased volumes would hurt the already-low farmgate prices of hog.

“Right now, we can’t raise the MAV because of the low farmgate price. It’s not the right time,” Mr. Tiu Laurel has told reporters.

In November, the DA froze applications for MAV quotas while the new policy was being worked out. MITA said the DA told it that the allocations will be finalized in January.

“The abruptness of this announcement caught licensees entirely by surprise. Orders have already been placed and buying decisions finalized. These sudden shifts have created substantial uncertainty, as imports may now fall under out-quota rates, significantly affecting landed cost and contractual commitments,” Mr. Cham said.

Earlier this year, MITA said it recommended increasing the pork MAV by 500,000 MT to offset the 900,000-MT production lost due to the ASF outbreak. The MAV Advisory Council later proposed an initial MAV Plus of 250,000 MT until 2028. Neither recommendation has been implemented.

MITA urged the government to retain the current MAV Guidelines and activate the MAV Plus mechanism for both pork and poultry, prioritizing existing licensees while designating part of the volume for first-come-first-served allocation.

The group also recommended referring the matter to the MAV Advisory Council, which they said has historically represented all stakeholders. — Vonn Andrei E. Villamiel

Market Opportunity
Talisman Logo
Talisman Price(SEEK)
$0.07287
$0.07287$0.07287
-0.20%
USD
Talisman (SEEK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

Ripple’s native token XRP is still battling out with the bears at the $1.90 territory on Friday afternoon. The support-turned-resistance at $1.90 is particularly
Share
Coinstats2026/01/24 03:25
Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Metaplanet Inc., the Japanese public company known for its bitcoin treasury, is launching a Miami subsidiary to run a dedicated derivatives and income strategy aimed at turning holdings into steady, U.S.-based cash flow. Japanese Bitcoin Treasury Player Metaplanet Opens Miami Outpost The new entity, Metaplanet Income Corp., sits under Metaplanet Holdings, Inc. and is based […]
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:32
The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The post The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Healthy competition drives innovation and better products for consumers; it is at the center of American economic leadership. Unfortunately, now that the bipartisan GENIUS Act has been signed into law, major legacy financial institutions seem to be having second thoughts about the innovations that stablecoins can bring to financial markets. Bank lobbying groups and public affairs teams have been peppering Congress with complaints about the law, urging members to reopen debate and introduce changes to the legislation that will ensure the stablecoin market doesn’t grow too quickly, protecting banks’ profits and stifling consumer choice. This reactionary response is both overblown and unnecessary. What legacy financial firms should do instead is embrace competition and offer exciting new products and services that consumers want, not try to kneecap emerging players through anti-innovation rules and regulations. The GENIUS Act was carefully designed with a thorough bipartisan process to strengthen consumer safeguards, ensure regulatory oversight, and preserve financial stability. Efforts to roll back its provisions are less about protecting families and more about protecting entrenched banking interests from the competition that helps ensure the U.S. banking system stays the strongest and most innovative in the world. Critics warn that allowing stablecoins to provide rewards could lead to massive deposit outflows from community banks, with figures as high as $6.6 trillion cited. But closer examination shows this fear is unfounded. A July 2025 analysis by consulting firm Charles River Associates found no statistically significant relationship between stablecoin adoption and community bank deposit outflows. In fact, the overwhelming majority of stablecoin reserves remain in the traditional financial system — either in commercial bank accounts or in short-term Treasuries — where they continue to support liquidity and credit in the broader U.S. economy. The dire estimates rely on unrealistic assumptions that every dollar of stablecoin issuance permanently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:39