The post MegaETH pre-deposit campaign descends into chaos appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways What went wrong with MegaETH’s pre-deposit campaign? The campaign suffered a catastrophic multisig error, where the team accidentally set a 4/4 signature requirement instead of the intended 3/4.  How did the community react to the chaos? Sentiment was split approximately 60/40 bearish, with critics calling it a “clown show” and demanding refunds, while defenders praised the “raw demand” that locked in $500M. MegaETH’s 25 November pre-deposit campaign was supposed to be a straightforward liquidity bootstrap ahead of mainnet launch.  Instead, it turned into hours of crashes, cap changes, and accusations of rug pulls. The 156-second stampede The campaign opened at 9:00 AM EST for KYC’d Sonar wallet holders, offering a $250 million cap on USDC bridges from Ethereum.  Early depositors would receive 2.5% $MEGA airdrop multipliers—premium terms that sparked immediate FOMO. Then everything broke. Third-party APIs collapsed under demand within minutes. The site stayed down for an hour. When it finally reopened at 10:00 AM, the entire $250 million cap filled in just 156 seconds. Whales and bots gorged while retail scrambled. The MegaETH multisig disaster At 10:15 AM, the MegaETH team announced they’d raise the cap to $1 billion “to give users access to USDm day 1.”  Early depositors immediately revolted—this meant 4x dilution on their yields with no warning and no withdrawal option. However, the team clarified at 10:30 AM that “first wave unaffected” through multiplier protections and scheduled the bridge reopening for 11:00 AM. Then came the critical error. While preparing the $1 billion transaction on their Gnosis Safe multisig, reportedly, the team accidentally required 4/4 signatures instead of leaving it at 3/4 pending. This made the transaction executable by anyone. At 10:26 AM, 34 minutes before the scheduled reopening, a user spotted the blunder and executed the transaction. Deposits exploded uncontrollably. Damage control gone… The post MegaETH pre-deposit campaign descends into chaos appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways What went wrong with MegaETH’s pre-deposit campaign? The campaign suffered a catastrophic multisig error, where the team accidentally set a 4/4 signature requirement instead of the intended 3/4.  How did the community react to the chaos? Sentiment was split approximately 60/40 bearish, with critics calling it a “clown show” and demanding refunds, while defenders praised the “raw demand” that locked in $500M. MegaETH’s 25 November pre-deposit campaign was supposed to be a straightforward liquidity bootstrap ahead of mainnet launch.  Instead, it turned into hours of crashes, cap changes, and accusations of rug pulls. The 156-second stampede The campaign opened at 9:00 AM EST for KYC’d Sonar wallet holders, offering a $250 million cap on USDC bridges from Ethereum.  Early depositors would receive 2.5% $MEGA airdrop multipliers—premium terms that sparked immediate FOMO. Then everything broke. Third-party APIs collapsed under demand within minutes. The site stayed down for an hour. When it finally reopened at 10:00 AM, the entire $250 million cap filled in just 156 seconds. Whales and bots gorged while retail scrambled. The MegaETH multisig disaster At 10:15 AM, the MegaETH team announced they’d raise the cap to $1 billion “to give users access to USDm day 1.”  Early depositors immediately revolted—this meant 4x dilution on their yields with no warning and no withdrawal option. However, the team clarified at 10:30 AM that “first wave unaffected” through multiplier protections and scheduled the bridge reopening for 11:00 AM. Then came the critical error. While preparing the $1 billion transaction on their Gnosis Safe multisig, reportedly, the team accidentally required 4/4 signatures instead of leaving it at 3/4 pending. This made the transaction executable by anyone. At 10:26 AM, 34 minutes before the scheduled reopening, a user spotted the blunder and executed the transaction. Deposits exploded uncontrollably. Damage control gone…

MegaETH pre-deposit campaign descends into chaos

Key Takeaways

What went wrong with MegaETH’s pre-deposit campaign?

The campaign suffered a catastrophic multisig error, where the team accidentally set a 4/4 signature requirement instead of the intended 3/4. 

How did the community react to the chaos?

Sentiment was split approximately 60/40 bearish, with critics calling it a “clown show” and demanding refunds, while defenders praised the “raw demand” that locked in $500M.


MegaETH’s 25 November pre-deposit campaign was supposed to be a straightforward liquidity bootstrap ahead of mainnet launch. 

Instead, it turned into hours of crashes, cap changes, and accusations of rug pulls.

The 156-second stampede

The campaign opened at 9:00 AM EST for KYC’d Sonar wallet holders, offering a $250 million cap on USDC bridges from Ethereum. 

Early depositors would receive 2.5% $MEGA airdrop multipliers—premium terms that sparked immediate FOMO.

Then everything broke.

Third-party APIs collapsed under demand within minutes. The site stayed down for an hour.

When it finally reopened at 10:00 AM, the entire $250 million cap filled in just 156 seconds. Whales and bots gorged while retail scrambled.

The MegaETH multisig disaster

At 10:15 AM, the MegaETH team announced they’d raise the cap to $1 billion “to give users access to USDm day 1.” 

Early depositors immediately revolted—this meant 4x dilution on their yields with no warning and no withdrawal option.

However, the team clarified at 10:30 AM that “first wave unaffected” through multiplier protections and scheduled the bridge reopening for 11:00 AM.

Then came the critical error.

While preparing the $1 billion transaction on their Gnosis Safe multisig, reportedly, the team accidentally required 4/4 signatures instead of leaving it at 3/4 pending.

This made the transaction executable by anyone.

At 10:26 AM, 34 minutes before the scheduled reopening, a user spotted the blunder and executed the transaction. Deposits exploded uncontrollably.

Damage control gone wrong

Panicked, the team attempted multiple cap adjustments:

  • Queued a revert to $400 million—overshot
  • Canceled and rebuilt for $500 million—executed successfully
  • Cap hit instantly again

By noon EST, they abandoned the $1 billion plan entirely, citing “unexpected issues.” Withdrawals were enabled for opt-outs, but uptake remained below 5%.

Source: X

The aftermath

Approximately $500 million now sits locked in team-controlled contracts. No exploits occurred, the contracts passed Zellic and Slowmist audits, but the multisig slip-up exposed alarming operational sloppiness.

On X, #MegaETH trended with over 50,000 mentions. Bulls celebrated the “insane demand” that locked half a billion in a bear market. Bears demanded refunds and mocked the “rug.”

A notable crypto commentator framed it as an “insane ride”.

With $MEGA pre-market hovering at $2-$3 and mainnet still scheduled for December, will hype survive this hangover?

Next: Japan demands mandatory reserves after $21mln SBI hack – What it means

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/megaeth-pe-deposit-campaign-descends-into-chaos/

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.02283
$0.02283$0.02283
-15.25%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

The post Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News 17 September 2025 | 20:13 The meme coin market is heating up once again as traders look for the next breakout token. While Shiba Inu (SHIB) continues to build its ecosystem and PEPE holds onto its viral roots, a new contender, Layer Brett (LBRETT), is gaining attention after raising more than $3.7 million in its presale. With a live staking system, fast-growing community, and real tech backing, some analysts are already calling it “the next PEPE.” Here’s the latest on the Shiba Inu price forecast, what’s going on with PEPE, and why Layer Brett is drawing in new investors fast. Shiba Inu price forecast: Ecosystem builds, but retail looks elsewhere Shiba Inu (SHIB) continues to develop its broader ecosystem with Shibarium, the project’s Layer 2 network built to improve speed and lower gas fees. While the community remains strong, the price hasn’t followed suit lately. SHIB is currently trading around $0.00001298, and while that’s a decent jump from its earlier lows, it still falls short of triggering any major excitement across the market. The project includes additional tokens like BONE and LEASH, and also has ongoing initiatives in DeFi and NFTs. However, even with all this development, many investors feel the hype that once surrounded SHIB has shifted elsewhere, particularly toward newer, more dynamic meme coins offering better entry points and incentives. PEPE: Can it rebound or is the momentum gone? PEPE saw a parabolic rise during the last meme coin surge, catching fire on social media and delivering massive short-term gains for early adopters. However, like most meme tokens driven largely by hype, it has since cooled off. PEPE is currently trading around $0.00001076, down significantly from its peak. While the token still enjoys a loyal community, analysts believe its best days may be behind it unless…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:50
Layer 2 Projects Social Activity Soars: Linea Outpaces Rivals with 3M+ Record Interactions

Layer 2 Projects Social Activity Soars: Linea Outpaces Rivals with 3M+ Record Interactions

The discussion is now focused on layer 2 projects, which are quicker, less expensive and more scalable to users. Linea is leading with record interactions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 04:20
Pound Sterling gathers strength to near 1.3400 on Trump’s tariff threats

Pound Sterling gathers strength to near 1.3400 on Trump’s tariff threats

The post Pound Sterling gathers strength to near 1.3400 on Trump’s tariff threats appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The GBP/USD pair gains traction to around
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/19 10:11