Big banks in the U.S. are not staying quiet anymore. They’re calling out crypto firms for trying to sneak into the regulated financial world using national trust-bank charters, and they’re pissed. Two trade group giants, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) and Independent Community Bankers of America, just told the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to kill Coinbase’s bid for one of these charters. And it’s not just about Coinbase. The BPI already shot off letters on October 31 opposing similar moves from Ripple, Circle, Paxos, and a few more. This isn’t some turf war over licenses. It’s about power. These charters would let crypto platforms gain federal legitimacy without actually following the same strict rules traditional banks follow. And banks are freaking out. They believe crypto platforms are looking for a shortcut into the heart of U.S. finance. By choosing narrow trust charters, these platforms are trying to dodge full banking supervision, all while reaping the benefits of a bank title. Banks accuse crypto of trying to game the system Old-school lenders say this is a backdoor move. They claim crypto firms want to wear the bank badge without carrying the regulatory burden. They fear it’ll destroy the whole point of having charters if anybody with a wallet app can get one and start acting like a bank. The deeper concern is that crypto is rewriting the rules without asking. Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould didn’t seem fazed. He fired back Tuesday at the Clearing House annual conference in New York, saying the trust charters actually allow the OCC to put crypto firms under federal oversight. According to him, it’s better to have these companies inside the system than outside it. “I have no ability to supervise or regulate nonbanks,” Gould said. “And so the only way I can possibly ensure a level playing field is for those who voluntarily come into this system or want to come into the system.” The banks aren’t buying it. They argue that even if the charters bring crypto firms closer to regulators, the playing field is still tilted. Especially when companies like Coinbase advertise a 3.85% return on USDC holdings, a stablecoin issued by Circle. Under the Genius Act, which just passed as the first federal law setting rules for stablecoins, issuers can’t offer interest. But platforms tied to them apparently still can. Crypto defends its position and slams back To critics, that 3.85% looks a lot like interest. And if it walks like a deposit and talks like a deposit, it could pull money out of the traditional banking system. That’s what’s got the banks sweating, a slow bleed of customer funds into stablecoin-based returns, with none of the protections or rules they’re stuck with. So far, the OCC hasn’t approved any new trust charters this year. But pressure is building. With the Genius Act now law, and incentives from crypto platforms already live, both sides know the next decision could reset how finance works in this country. Bankers say the regulatory gap is being exploited. Trust charters could let crypto companies handle custody and payments while skipping over the tighter controls real banks face. But crypto leaders aren’t backing down. They say trust companies already follow laws, including a ban on lending, which lowers the risk. Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger blasted the banks. “It’s disappointing that the Bank Policy Institute predictably continues to resist competition and innovation in financial services,” she said. “Rather than defending the status quo, it’s time to drain the regulatory moat that protects traditional finance from new entrants.” Then there’s the Trump factor. Since Donald Trump returned to the White House, his administration has peeled back rules and given the crypto space more room to grow. Just last month, the Federal Reserve hosted a payments innovation conference, sending a loud message that the crypto crowd is no longer on the sidelines. Fed Governor Christopher Waller made it clear: “This is a new era for the Federal Reserve in payments, the defi industry is not viewed with suspicion or scorn. Rather, today, you are welcomed to the conversation on the future of payments in the United States and on our home field, something that would have been unimaginable a few years ago.” Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.Big banks in the U.S. are not staying quiet anymore. They’re calling out crypto firms for trying to sneak into the regulated financial world using national trust-bank charters, and they’re pissed. Two trade group giants, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) and Independent Community Bankers of America, just told the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to kill Coinbase’s bid for one of these charters. And it’s not just about Coinbase. The BPI already shot off letters on October 31 opposing similar moves from Ripple, Circle, Paxos, and a few more. This isn’t some turf war over licenses. It’s about power. These charters would let crypto platforms gain federal legitimacy without actually following the same strict rules traditional banks follow. And banks are freaking out. They believe crypto platforms are looking for a shortcut into the heart of U.S. finance. By choosing narrow trust charters, these platforms are trying to dodge full banking supervision, all while reaping the benefits of a bank title. Banks accuse crypto of trying to game the system Old-school lenders say this is a backdoor move. They claim crypto firms want to wear the bank badge without carrying the regulatory burden. They fear it’ll destroy the whole point of having charters if anybody with a wallet app can get one and start acting like a bank. The deeper concern is that crypto is rewriting the rules without asking. Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould didn’t seem fazed. He fired back Tuesday at the Clearing House annual conference in New York, saying the trust charters actually allow the OCC to put crypto firms under federal oversight. According to him, it’s better to have these companies inside the system than outside it. “I have no ability to supervise or regulate nonbanks,” Gould said. “And so the only way I can possibly ensure a level playing field is for those who voluntarily come into this system or want to come into the system.” The banks aren’t buying it. They argue that even if the charters bring crypto firms closer to regulators, the playing field is still tilted. Especially when companies like Coinbase advertise a 3.85% return on USDC holdings, a stablecoin issued by Circle. Under the Genius Act, which just passed as the first federal law setting rules for stablecoins, issuers can’t offer interest. But platforms tied to them apparently still can. Crypto defends its position and slams back To critics, that 3.85% looks a lot like interest. And if it walks like a deposit and talks like a deposit, it could pull money out of the traditional banking system. That’s what’s got the banks sweating, a slow bleed of customer funds into stablecoin-based returns, with none of the protections or rules they’re stuck with. So far, the OCC hasn’t approved any new trust charters this year. But pressure is building. With the Genius Act now law, and incentives from crypto platforms already live, both sides know the next decision could reset how finance works in this country. Bankers say the regulatory gap is being exploited. Trust charters could let crypto companies handle custody and payments while skipping over the tighter controls real banks face. But crypto leaders aren’t backing down. They say trust companies already follow laws, including a ban on lending, which lowers the risk. Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger blasted the banks. “It’s disappointing that the Bank Policy Institute predictably continues to resist competition and innovation in financial services,” she said. “Rather than defending the status quo, it’s time to drain the regulatory moat that protects traditional finance from new entrants.” Then there’s the Trump factor. Since Donald Trump returned to the White House, his administration has peeled back rules and given the crypto space more room to grow. Just last month, the Federal Reserve hosted a payments innovation conference, sending a loud message that the crypto crowd is no longer on the sidelines. Fed Governor Christopher Waller made it clear: “This is a new era for the Federal Reserve in payments, the defi industry is not viewed with suspicion or scorn. Rather, today, you are welcomed to the conversation on the future of payments in the United States and on our home field, something that would have been unimaginable a few years ago.” Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

US banks say crypto applications for trust charters threaten financial system

Big banks in the U.S. are not staying quiet anymore. They’re calling out crypto firms for trying to sneak into the regulated financial world using national trust-bank charters, and they’re pissed.

Two trade group giants, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) and Independent Community Bankers of America, just told the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to kill Coinbase’s bid for one of these charters.

And it’s not just about Coinbase. The BPI already shot off letters on October 31 opposing similar moves from Ripple, Circle, Paxos, and a few more.

This isn’t some turf war over licenses. It’s about power. These charters would let crypto platforms gain federal legitimacy without actually following the same strict rules traditional banks follow.

And banks are freaking out. They believe crypto platforms are looking for a shortcut into the heart of U.S. finance. By choosing narrow trust charters, these platforms are trying to dodge full banking supervision, all while reaping the benefits of a bank title.

Banks accuse crypto of trying to game the system

Old-school lenders say this is a backdoor move. They claim crypto firms want to wear the bank badge without carrying the regulatory burden.

They fear it’ll destroy the whole point of having charters if anybody with a wallet app can get one and start acting like a bank. The deeper concern is that crypto is rewriting the rules without asking.

Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould didn’t seem fazed. He fired back Tuesday at the Clearing House annual conference in New York, saying the trust charters actually allow the OCC to put crypto firms under federal oversight.

According to him, it’s better to have these companies inside the system than outside it. “I have no ability to supervise or regulate nonbanks,” Gould said. “And so the only way I can possibly ensure a level playing field is for those who voluntarily come into this system or want to come into the system.”

The banks aren’t buying it. They argue that even if the charters bring crypto firms closer to regulators, the playing field is still tilted. Especially when companies like Coinbase advertise a 3.85% return on USDC holdings, a stablecoin issued by Circle.

Under the Genius Act, which just passed as the first federal law setting rules for stablecoins, issuers can’t offer interest. But platforms tied to them apparently still can.

Crypto defends its position and slams back

To critics, that 3.85% looks a lot like interest. And if it walks like a deposit and talks like a deposit, it could pull money out of the traditional banking system. That’s what’s got the banks sweating, a slow bleed of customer funds into stablecoin-based returns, with none of the protections or rules they’re stuck with.

So far, the OCC hasn’t approved any new trust charters this year. But pressure is building. With the Genius Act now law, and incentives from crypto platforms already live, both sides know the next decision could reset how finance works in this country.

Bankers say the regulatory gap is being exploited. Trust charters could let crypto companies handle custody and payments while skipping over the tighter controls real banks face. But crypto leaders aren’t backing down. They say trust companies already follow laws, including a ban on lending, which lowers the risk.

Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger blasted the banks. “It’s disappointing that the Bank Policy Institute predictably continues to resist competition and innovation in financial services,” she said. “Rather than defending the status quo, it’s time to drain the regulatory moat that protects traditional finance from new entrants.”

Then there’s the Trump factor. Since Donald Trump returned to the White House, his administration has peeled back rules and given the crypto space more room to grow. Just last month, the Federal Reserve hosted a payments innovation conference, sending a loud message that the crypto crowd is no longer on the sidelines.

Fed Governor Christopher Waller made it clear: “This is a new era for the Federal Reserve in payments, the defi industry is not viewed with suspicion or scorn. Rather, today, you are welcomed to the conversation on the future of payments in the United States and on our home field, something that would have been unimaginable a few years ago.”

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Market Opportunity
Intuition Logo
Intuition Price(TRUST)
$0.09676
$0.09676$0.09676
-4.27%
USD
Intuition (TRUST) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why Bitcoin’s Bear Case Is Suddenly Back on the Table

Why Bitcoin’s Bear Case Is Suddenly Back on the Table

Fear, Liquidity, and Market Structure Collide at a Critical Moment Bitcoin has spent most of January 2026 trading under pressure, slipping below key psycho
Share
Medium2026/01/20 20:55
USD/JPY drops to near 157.80 as US-EU disputes batter US Dollar

USD/JPY drops to near 157.80 as US-EU disputes batter US Dollar

The post USD/JPY drops to near 157.80 as US-EU disputes batter US Dollar appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The USD/JPY pair is down 0.2% to near 157.80 during
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 21:27
MetaMask Token: Exciting Launch Could Be Sooner Than Expected

MetaMask Token: Exciting Launch Could Be Sooner Than Expected

BitcoinWorld MetaMask Token: Exciting Launch Could Be Sooner Than Expected The cryptocurrency community is buzzing with exciting news: a native MetaMask token might arrive sooner than many anticipated. This development could reshape how users interact with the popular Web3 wallet and the broader decentralized ecosystem. It signals a significant step forward for one of the most widely used tools in the blockchain space. What’s Fueling the MetaMask Token Buzz? Joseph Lubin, the CEO of ConsenSys, the company behind MetaMask, recently shared insights that ignited this excitement. According to reports from The Block, Lubin indicated that a MetaMask token could launch ahead of previous expectations. This isn’t the first time the idea has surfaced; Dan Finlay, one of MetaMask’s founders, had previously mentioned the possibility of issuing such a token. ConsenSys has been a pivotal player in the Ethereum ecosystem, developing essential infrastructure and applications. MetaMask, their flagship wallet, serves millions of users, providing a gateway to decentralized applications (dApps), NFTs, and various blockchain networks. Therefore, any move to introduce a native token is a major event for the entire Web3 community. Why is a MetaMask Token So Anticipated? The prospect of a MetaMask token generates immense interest because it could introduce new layers of utility and community governance. Users often speculate about the benefits such a token could offer. Here are some key reasons for the high anticipation: Governance Rights: A token could empower users to participate in the future direction and development of MetaMask. This means voting on new features, upgrades, or even changes to the platform’s policies. Ecosystem Rewards: Tokens might be distributed as rewards for active participation, using certain features, or contributing to the MetaMask community. This incentivizes engagement and loyalty. Enhanced Utility: The token could unlock premium features, reduce transaction fees, or provide exclusive access to services within the MetaMask ecosystem or partnered dApps. Decentralization: Introducing a token often aligns with the broader Web3 ethos of decentralization, distributing control and ownership among its users rather than centralizing it within ConsenSys. Consequently, a token launch is seen as a way to deepen user involvement and foster a more robust, community-driven ecosystem around the wallet. Exploring the Potential Impact of a MetaMask Token The introduction of a MetaMask token could have far-reaching implications for the decentralized finance (DeFi) and Web3 landscape. Firstly, it could set a new standard for how popular infrastructure tools engage with their user base. By providing a tangible stake, MetaMask might strengthen its position as a community-governed platform. Moreover, a token could significantly boost the wallet’s visibility and adoption, attracting new users eager to participate in its governance or benefit from its utility. This could also lead to innovative integrations with other blockchain projects, creating a more interconnected and efficient Web3 experience. Ultimately, the success of such a token will depend on its design, utility, and how effectively it engages the global MetaMask community. What Challenges Could a MetaMask Token Face? While the excitement is palpable, launching a MetaMask token also presents several challenges that ConsenSys must navigate carefully. One primary concern is regulatory scrutiny. The classification of cryptocurrency tokens varies across jurisdictions, and ensuring compliance is crucial for long-term success. Furthermore, designing a fair and equitable distribution model is paramount. Ensuring that the token provides genuine utility beyond mere speculation will be another hurdle. A token must integrate seamlessly into the MetaMask experience and offer clear value to its holders. Additionally, managing community expectations and preventing market manipulation will require robust strategies. Addressing these challenges effectively will be key to the token’s sustainable growth and positive reception. What’s Next for the MetaMask Ecosystem? The prospect of a MetaMask token signals an evolving strategy for ConsenSys and the future of Web3 wallets. It reflects a growing trend where foundational tools seek to empower their communities through tokenization. Users are keenly watching for official announcements regarding the token’s mechanics, distribution, and launch timeline. This development could solidify MetaMask’s role not just as a wallet, but as a central pillar of decentralized identity and interaction. The potential for a sooner-than-expected launch adds an element of urgency and excitement, encouraging users to stay informed about every new detail. It represents a significant milestone for a platform that has become synonymous with accessing the decentralized web. Conclusion The hints from ConsenSys CEO Joseph Lubin regarding an earlier launch for the MetaMask token have undoubtedly captured the attention of the entire crypto world. This potential development promises to bring enhanced governance, utility, and community engagement to millions of MetaMask users. While challenges exist, the underlying potential for a more decentralized and user-driven ecosystem is immense. The coming months will likely reveal more about this highly anticipated token, marking a new chapter for one of Web3’s most vital tools. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is a MetaMask token? A MetaMask token would be a native cryptocurrency issued by ConsenSys, the company behind the MetaMask wallet. It is expected to offer various utilities, including governance rights, rewards, and access to special features within the MetaMask ecosystem. Q2: Why is ConsenSys considering launching a MetaMask token? ConsenSys is likely exploring a token launch to further decentralize the MetaMask platform, empower its user community with governance rights, incentivize active participation, and potentially unlock new forms of utility and growth for the ecosystem. Q3: What benefits could users gain from a MetaMask token? Users could gain several benefits, such as the ability to vote on MetaMask’s future developments, earn rewards for using the wallet, access exclusive features, or potentially reduce transaction fees. It also provides a direct stake in the platform’s success. Q4: When is the MetaMask token expected to launch? While no official launch date has been confirmed, ConsenSys CEO Joseph Lubin has indicated that the launch could happen sooner than previously expected. The exact timeline remains subject to official announcements from ConsenSys. Q5: How would a MetaMask token impact the broader Web3 ecosystem? A MetaMask token could significantly impact Web3 by setting a precedent for user-owned and governed infrastructure tools. It could drive further decentralization, foster innovation, and strengthen the connection between users and the platforms they rely on, ultimately contributing to a more robust and participatory decentralized internet. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum institutional adoption. This post MetaMask Token: Exciting Launch Could Be Sooner Than Expected first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/19 15:40