The post OpenAI builds for the masses; Anthropic builds for boardrooms, and maybe that's smarter appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Amazon-backed Anthropic is taking a route that looks far more stable than the mass-audience path OpenAI is pushing. Both companies build advanced AI systems used in chatbots, coding tools and image generators, but their strategies for making real, steady revenue are not the same. Anthropic is focused on business clients who use AI for work that saves time and lowers costs, while OpenAI is focused on everyday users replacing search queries with chatbot conversations. Naturally, this difference has produced two very different business outcomes. OpenAI has massive visibility thanks to ChatGPT, which it says pulls more than 800 million weekly users. That has pushed OpenAI to a $13 billion annual revenue run rate. But the company itself says only around 30% of that comes from businesses. The rest is consumer subscriptions through a $20 per month Plus plan and a $200 per month Pro plan, alongside a slower free tier, a strategy that depends on huge scale continuing and is extremely costly to maintain. Anthropic’s enterprise focus changes its revenue dynamics Anthropic reported that about 80% of its revenue comes from corporate customers.It recently said it had around 300,000 business clients. These customers use Anthropic’s Claude models for tasks such as writing code, reviewing legal language and accelerating billing workflows. These are job functions that directly affect budgets and time, making it clearer for companies to justify paying for them. A July survey from Menlo Ventures, which has invested in Anthropic, found that the company held 42% market share in coding applications, compared to OpenAI’s 21%.In broader enterprise AI usage, Menlo estimated Anthropic at 32% versus OpenAI at 25%.Anthropic is also close to OpenAI in revenue terms despite having far fewer active users. The company is already at a $7 billion annual run rate and expects to reach $9 billion… The post OpenAI builds for the masses; Anthropic builds for boardrooms, and maybe that's smarter appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Amazon-backed Anthropic is taking a route that looks far more stable than the mass-audience path OpenAI is pushing. Both companies build advanced AI systems used in chatbots, coding tools and image generators, but their strategies for making real, steady revenue are not the same. Anthropic is focused on business clients who use AI for work that saves time and lowers costs, while OpenAI is focused on everyday users replacing search queries with chatbot conversations. Naturally, this difference has produced two very different business outcomes. OpenAI has massive visibility thanks to ChatGPT, which it says pulls more than 800 million weekly users. That has pushed OpenAI to a $13 billion annual revenue run rate. But the company itself says only around 30% of that comes from businesses. The rest is consumer subscriptions through a $20 per month Plus plan and a $200 per month Pro plan, alongside a slower free tier, a strategy that depends on huge scale continuing and is extremely costly to maintain. Anthropic’s enterprise focus changes its revenue dynamics Anthropic reported that about 80% of its revenue comes from corporate customers.It recently said it had around 300,000 business clients. These customers use Anthropic’s Claude models for tasks such as writing code, reviewing legal language and accelerating billing workflows. These are job functions that directly affect budgets and time, making it clearer for companies to justify paying for them. A July survey from Menlo Ventures, which has invested in Anthropic, found that the company held 42% market share in coding applications, compared to OpenAI’s 21%.In broader enterprise AI usage, Menlo estimated Anthropic at 32% versus OpenAI at 25%.Anthropic is also close to OpenAI in revenue terms despite having far fewer active users. The company is already at a $7 billion annual run rate and expects to reach $9 billion…

OpenAI builds for the masses; Anthropic builds for boardrooms, and maybe that's smarter

Amazon-backed Anthropic is taking a route that looks far more stable than the mass-audience path OpenAI is pushing.

Both companies build advanced AI systems used in chatbots, coding tools and image generators, but their strategies for making real, steady revenue are not the same. Anthropic is focused on business clients who use AI for work that saves time and lowers costs, while OpenAI is focused on everyday users replacing search queries with chatbot conversations.

Naturally, this difference has produced two very different business outcomes.

OpenAI has massive visibility thanks to ChatGPT, which it says pulls more than 800 million weekly users. That has pushed OpenAI to a $13 billion annual revenue run rate.

But the company itself says only around 30% of that comes from businesses. The rest is consumer subscriptions through a $20 per month Plus plan and a $200 per month Pro plan, alongside a slower free tier, a strategy that depends on huge scale continuing and is extremely costly to maintain.

Anthropic’s enterprise focus changes its revenue dynamics

Anthropic reported that about 80% of its revenue comes from corporate customers.It recently said it had around 300,000 business clients.

These customers use Anthropic’s Claude models for tasks such as writing code, reviewing legal language and accelerating billing workflows. These are job functions that directly affect budgets and time, making it clearer for companies to justify paying for them.

A July survey from Menlo Ventures, which has invested in Anthropic, found that the company held 42% market share in coding applications, compared to OpenAI’s 21%.In broader enterprise AI usage, Menlo estimated Anthropic at 32% versus OpenAI at 25%.Anthropic is also close to OpenAI in revenue terms despite having far fewer active users.

The company is already at a $7 billion annual run rate and expects to reach $9 billion by the end of the year. That means its revenue per user is much higher because those users are businesses, not casual chatbot users.

Both companies rely on major tech backers for compute and infrastructure. OpenAI works closely with Microsoft, which integrates its models into products across Office and enterprise software.

Anthropic receives support from Amazon and Google, giving it access to large-scale computing resources and corporate customer channels.

Corporate demand for Anthropic is clear. In September, Microsoft announced that Claude would be added to its Copilot software suite, and it happened despite Microsoft already being deeply tied to OpenAI, showing that enterprise users specifically requested Claude and its performance in work scenarios.

OpenAI’s revenue path remains unclear as it courts mass users

OpenAI’s consumer-first approach has not settled on a fully reliable business model. Subscriptions alone are unlikely to cover the extremely high cost of training and operating advanced models.

The most obvious additional revenue stream would be advertising, but ads in chatbot responses pose major problems. Unlike search ads, chatbot conversations do not have natural placement for paid suggestions.

Users are unlikely to accept brand messaging inside personal chat responses. OpenAI would also have to compete with Google, whose advertising infrastructure is far more established.

OpenAI is trying to expand among businesses as well, but there are concerns about whether its consumer-driven brand aligns with what corporate customers want. Recently, OpenAI said it would allow adults to have erotic conversations with ChatGPT.

The company has also pushed for a lighter regulatory approach. Even if OpenAI provides stricter controls in corporate settings, its reputation may raise hesitation among companies looking for consistent and predictable tools.

Performance comparisons also show the competitive AI space is changing. Vals AI, a company that evaluates language models on business tasks in finance, law and coding, ranked the newest version of Claude at the top of its benchmark.

Rayan Krishnan, the co-founder of Vals, said, “Anthropic is laser-focused on these agentic enterprise use cases and they’re playing a very competitive game with OpenAI right now.”

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/openai-for-masses-anthropic-for-boardrooms/

Market Opportunity
Router Protocol Logo
Router Protocol Price(ROUTE)
$0.00145
$0.00145$0.00145
-4.85%
USD
Router Protocol (ROUTE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50
Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

The post Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes A new report from Dune and RWA.xyz highlights Polygon’s role in the growing RWA sector. Polygon PoS currently holds $1.13 billion in RWA Total Value Locked (TVL) across 269 assets. The network holds a 62% market share of tokenized global bonds, driven by European money market funds. The Polygon POL $0.25 24h volatility: 1.4% Market cap: $2.64 B Vol. 24h: $106.17 M network is securing a significant position in the rapidly growing tokenization space, now holding over $1.13 billion in total value locked (TVL) from Real World Assets (RWAs). This development comes as the network continues to evolve, recently deploying its major “Rio” upgrade on the Amoy testnet to enhance future scaling capabilities. This information comes from a new joint report on the state of the RWA market published on Sept. 17 by blockchain analytics firm Dune and data platform RWA.xyz. The focus on RWAs is intensifying across the industry, coinciding with events like the ongoing Real-World Asset Summit in New York. Sandeep Nailwal, CEO of the Polygon Foundation, highlighted the findings via a post on X, noting that the TVL is spread across 269 assets and 2,900 holders on the Polygon PoS chain. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 Key Trends From the 2025 RWA Report The joint publication, titled “RWA REPORT 2025,” offers a comprehensive look into the tokenized asset landscape, which it states has grown 224% since the start of 2024. The report identifies several key trends driving this expansion. According to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:40
Veteran Holder Dodges Liquidation Amidst $83M Loss

Veteran Holder Dodges Liquidation Amidst $83M Loss

The post Veteran Holder Dodges Liquidation Amidst $83M Loss appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin Whale’s Critical $20M Rescue: Veteran Holder Dodges Liquidation
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/26 08:48