The post Democrats Implement Counter-Measure to Restrict DeFi Protocols appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Despite previously supporting a crypto market structure bill, several Democratic US senators have reportedly introduced a counter-proposal that could see decentralized finance protocols placed on a “restricted list” if deemed too risky. This move, among others they proposed, could “kill DeFi” or move it offshore from the US, according to critics. The Senate Banking Committee Democrats sent a proposal to the committee’s Republicans on Thursday seeking to impose Know Your Customer rules on the frontends of crypto apps — including non-custodial wallets — and to strip protections from crypto developers, Punchbowl News reported on Thursday. Crypto lawyer Jake Chervinsky said the counter-proposal could kill any chance of establishing a crypto market structure framework, noting that it could undermine the bipartisan support the CLARITY Act had already secured in the House in July, where it passed 294-134.  “It’s so bad. It doesn’t regulate crypto, it bans crypto,” Chervinsky said, pointing to a suggested measure permitting the Treasury Department to create a “restricted list” for DeFi protocols it considers too risky. Any US national who uses those protocols and makes “recurring revenues” from them may also face punishment, said the founder and president of MetaLeX Labs, Gabriel Shapiro. Chervinsky said the proposal seemed less like a regulatory framework and more like an “unprecedented, unconstitutional government takeover of an entire industry.” ”It’s not just anti-crypto, it’s anti-innovation, and a dangerous precedent for the entire tech sector.” Source: Jake Chervinsky The Democrats behind the counter-proposal include Mark Warner, Ruben Gallego, Andy Kim, Reverend Raphael Warnock, Angela Alsobrooks and Lisa Blunt Rochester, according to Chervinsky.  The move, which comes amid a government shutdown, could be seen as reversing regulatory momentum built under the Trump administration, which has pledged to make the United States the “crypto capital of the world.” Counter-proposal undermines bipartisan RFIA draft It also clashes with… The post Democrats Implement Counter-Measure to Restrict DeFi Protocols appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Despite previously supporting a crypto market structure bill, several Democratic US senators have reportedly introduced a counter-proposal that could see decentralized finance protocols placed on a “restricted list” if deemed too risky. This move, among others they proposed, could “kill DeFi” or move it offshore from the US, according to critics. The Senate Banking Committee Democrats sent a proposal to the committee’s Republicans on Thursday seeking to impose Know Your Customer rules on the frontends of crypto apps — including non-custodial wallets — and to strip protections from crypto developers, Punchbowl News reported on Thursday. Crypto lawyer Jake Chervinsky said the counter-proposal could kill any chance of establishing a crypto market structure framework, noting that it could undermine the bipartisan support the CLARITY Act had already secured in the House in July, where it passed 294-134.  “It’s so bad. It doesn’t regulate crypto, it bans crypto,” Chervinsky said, pointing to a suggested measure permitting the Treasury Department to create a “restricted list” for DeFi protocols it considers too risky. Any US national who uses those protocols and makes “recurring revenues” from them may also face punishment, said the founder and president of MetaLeX Labs, Gabriel Shapiro. Chervinsky said the proposal seemed less like a regulatory framework and more like an “unprecedented, unconstitutional government takeover of an entire industry.” ”It’s not just anti-crypto, it’s anti-innovation, and a dangerous precedent for the entire tech sector.” Source: Jake Chervinsky The Democrats behind the counter-proposal include Mark Warner, Ruben Gallego, Andy Kim, Reverend Raphael Warnock, Angela Alsobrooks and Lisa Blunt Rochester, according to Chervinsky.  The move, which comes amid a government shutdown, could be seen as reversing regulatory momentum built under the Trump administration, which has pledged to make the United States the “crypto capital of the world.” Counter-proposal undermines bipartisan RFIA draft It also clashes with…

Democrats Implement Counter-Measure to Restrict DeFi Protocols

Despite previously supporting a crypto market structure bill, several Democratic US senators have reportedly introduced a counter-proposal that could see decentralized finance protocols placed on a “restricted list” if deemed too risky.

This move, among others they proposed, could “kill DeFi” or move it offshore from the US, according to critics.

The Senate Banking Committee Democrats sent a proposal to the committee’s Republicans on Thursday seeking to impose Know Your Customer rules on the frontends of crypto apps — including non-custodial wallets — and to strip protections from crypto developers, Punchbowl News reported on Thursday.

Crypto lawyer Jake Chervinsky said the counter-proposal could kill any chance of establishing a crypto market structure framework, noting that it could undermine the bipartisan support the CLARITY Act had already secured in the House in July, where it passed 294-134. 

“It’s so bad. It doesn’t regulate crypto, it bans crypto,” Chervinsky said, pointing to a suggested measure permitting the Treasury Department to create a “restricted list” for DeFi protocols it considers too risky.

Any US national who uses those protocols and makes “recurring revenues” from them may also face punishment, said the founder and president of MetaLeX Labs, Gabriel Shapiro.

Chervinsky said the proposal seemed less like a regulatory framework and more like an “unprecedented, unconstitutional government takeover of an entire industry.”

Source: Jake Chervinsky

The Democrats behind the counter-proposal include Mark Warner, Ruben Gallego, Andy Kim, Reverend Raphael Warnock, Angela Alsobrooks and Lisa Blunt Rochester, according to Chervinsky. 

The move, which comes amid a government shutdown, could be seen as reversing regulatory momentum built under the Trump administration, which has pledged to make the United States the “crypto capital of the world.”

Counter-proposal undermines bipartisan RFIA draft

It also clashes with aspects of the Senate Banking Committee’s Responsible Financial Innovation Act draft on Sept. 9, a bipartisan effort that seeks to assign the Commodity Futures Trading Commission oversight of spot markets and reduce the Securities and Exchange Commission’s overreach. 

RFIA also seeks to offer more robust protections to crypto developers to ensure they can build without fear of being prosecuted, amid the Tornado Cash and Samourai Wallet devs in recent months.

Source: Zack Shapiro

Good policy doesn’t punish decentralization: Digital Chamber

Digital Chamber’s vice president of government and policy affairs, Zunera Mazhar, described the measures as heavy-handed and ineffective, adding that they risk pushing innovation offshore instead of addressing the real risks involved.

Related: Democrats press bank regulator on Trump stablecoin conflicts

Instead, Mazhar said the Democrats should target the “real chokepoints” where illicit finance occurs with a risk-based approach that doesn’t crush innovation and create regulatory uncertainty.

Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger agreed with Mazhar’s take, adding that the proposal would make compliance impossible for industry players in the US.

Source: Summer Mersinger

Magazine: EU’s privacy-killing Chat Control bill delayed — but fight isn’t over

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/democrat-defi-regulation-proposal-restricted-list-critcs?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.000455
$0.000455$0.000455
-0.21%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Gets ‘Golden’ Ticket With 2 Nominations

‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Gets ‘Golden’ Ticket With 2 Nominations

The post ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Gets ‘Golden’ Ticket With 2 Nominations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Mira (voice of May Hong), Rumi (Arden Cho) and Zoey (
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 23:28
Tron Founder Justin Sun Invests $8M in River’s Stablecoin Abstraction Technology

Tron Founder Justin Sun Invests $8M in River’s Stablecoin Abstraction Technology

Justin Sun commits $8 million to River for stablecoin abstraction deployment across Tron ecosystem, including SUN pools and JustLend integration, as RIVER token
Share
Coinstats2026/01/22 22:59