The post Will Trump Sue ABC Over Jimmy Kimmel? Why Claims About ‘Illegal Contributions’ Are False appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline President Donald Trump threatened Tuesday to sue ABC over its decision to resume “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”—but while Trump claims that Kimmel’s criticism of the president constitutes unlawful political “contributions,” legal experts contend that’s false, as anything the comedian says on his show is covered by an exemption under campaign finance law. “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” returned to ABC on Sept. 23 following a week-long suspension that drew widespread controversy. Disney via Getty Images Key Facts Trump attacked ABC for its decision to resume Kimmel’s show after suspending it for a week, suggesting on Truth Social he would sue the outlet and writing, “Last time I went after [ABC], they gave me $16 Million Dollars. This one sounds even more lucrative.” The president suggested he would specifically sue ABC for alleged campaign finance law violations, falsely claiming Kimmel is “yet another arm of the DNC and, to the best of my knowledge, that would be a major Illegal Campaign Contribution.” But legal experts say that argument is wrong, with campaign finance attorney Brett Kappel telling Forbes Kimmel’s comments are “clearly covered by the ‘media exemption’” in campaign finance law. While federal campaign finance law broadly bars corporations from making any monetary or non-monetary contributions in order to influence an election, it also carves out what’s known as a “media exemption” or “press exemption,” stating the prohibitions don’t apply regarding “any news story, commentary, or editorial” distributed through a “broadcasting station” or “periodical publication,” as long as it’s not owned by a political party or candidate. As a result, the Federal Election Commission has repeatedly held it is fine for media and entertainment companies to broadcast content that talks about elections or political candidates, including when it clearly favors a certain candidate, as long as the speech is within the scope of… The post Will Trump Sue ABC Over Jimmy Kimmel? Why Claims About ‘Illegal Contributions’ Are False appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline President Donald Trump threatened Tuesday to sue ABC over its decision to resume “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”—but while Trump claims that Kimmel’s criticism of the president constitutes unlawful political “contributions,” legal experts contend that’s false, as anything the comedian says on his show is covered by an exemption under campaign finance law. “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” returned to ABC on Sept. 23 following a week-long suspension that drew widespread controversy. Disney via Getty Images Key Facts Trump attacked ABC for its decision to resume Kimmel’s show after suspending it for a week, suggesting on Truth Social he would sue the outlet and writing, “Last time I went after [ABC], they gave me $16 Million Dollars. This one sounds even more lucrative.” The president suggested he would specifically sue ABC for alleged campaign finance law violations, falsely claiming Kimmel is “yet another arm of the DNC and, to the best of my knowledge, that would be a major Illegal Campaign Contribution.” But legal experts say that argument is wrong, with campaign finance attorney Brett Kappel telling Forbes Kimmel’s comments are “clearly covered by the ‘media exemption’” in campaign finance law. While federal campaign finance law broadly bars corporations from making any monetary or non-monetary contributions in order to influence an election, it also carves out what’s known as a “media exemption” or “press exemption,” stating the prohibitions don’t apply regarding “any news story, commentary, or editorial” distributed through a “broadcasting station” or “periodical publication,” as long as it’s not owned by a political party or candidate. As a result, the Federal Election Commission has repeatedly held it is fine for media and entertainment companies to broadcast content that talks about elections or political candidates, including when it clearly favors a certain candidate, as long as the speech is within the scope of…

Will Trump Sue ABC Over Jimmy Kimmel? Why Claims About ‘Illegal Contributions’ Are False

Topline

President Donald Trump threatened Tuesday to sue ABC over its decision to resume “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”—but while Trump claims that Kimmel’s criticism of the president constitutes unlawful political “contributions,” legal experts contend that’s false, as anything the comedian says on his show is covered by an exemption under campaign finance law.

“Jimmy Kimmel Live!” returned to ABC on Sept. 23 following a week-long suspension that drew widespread controversy.

Disney via Getty Images

Key Facts

Trump attacked ABC for its decision to resume Kimmel’s show after suspending it for a week, suggesting on Truth Social he would sue the outlet and writing, “Last time I went after [ABC], they gave me $16 Million Dollars. This one sounds even more lucrative.”

The president suggested he would specifically sue ABC for alleged campaign finance law violations, falsely claiming Kimmel is “yet another arm of the DNC and, to the best of my knowledge, that would be a major Illegal Campaign Contribution.”

But legal experts say that argument is wrong, with campaign finance attorney Brett Kappel telling Forbes Kimmel’s comments are “clearly covered by the ‘media exemption’” in campaign finance law.

While federal campaign finance law broadly bars corporations from making any monetary or non-monetary contributions in order to influence an election, it also carves out what’s known as a “media exemption” or “press exemption,” stating the prohibitions don’t apply regarding “any news story, commentary, or editorial” distributed through a “broadcasting station” or “periodical publication,” as long as it’s not owned by a political party or candidate.

As a result, the Federal Election Commission has repeatedly held it is fine for media and entertainment companies to broadcast content that talks about elections or political candidates, including when it clearly favors a certain candidate, as long as the speech is within the scope of the company’s typical work as a “press entity.”

That means Kimmel can explicitly make anti-Trump comments on his show, and ABC can pay him to do so, without running afoul of any federal laws or being considered in any way a contribution to the Democratic Party.

What To Watch For

While Trump suggested he’ll sue Kimmel in his Truth Social post Tuesday night, no litigation has yet been filed. ABC moved forward with airing “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” on Tuesday after Trump posted his remark on social media, and has so far not shown any indication it will take further action against Kimmel in light of Trump’s most recent comments.

Chief Critic

“There is no credible claim, despite Trump’s insinuation, that ABC is ‘owned or controlled by’ the Democratic National Committee, just as there would be no credible claim that The New York Times or any other liberal-leaning media outlet is,” election law expert Rick Hasen wrote in a blog post early Wednesday responding to Trump’s Truth Social post, describing the president’s comments as “incredibly alarming.” Trump going after “a media company in an effort to secure a ‘lucrative’ settlement just because the media company engages in speech critical of the President is extremely antithetical to how a system of self-government with free elections is supposed to work,” Hasen argued.

When Does The ‘media Exemption’ Apply?

The media exemption was created in order to preserve the freedom of the press and ensure “the unfettered right of the newspapers, TV networks, and other media to cover and comment on political campaigns,” the FEC has noted, and allows media coverage to be exempted from being considered as political contributions or expenditures. That includes media content that’s made for entertainment, rather than news coverage, and the FEC has held it includes content on the internet and cable television in addition to more traditional media like newspapers and broadcast networks. In order to determine whether content fits into the media exemption, the FEC applies a two-part test. The first part asks whether the entity at issue is controlled by any political party, committee or candidate. If it’s not, the FEC then determines whether the company “is acting as a press entity in conducting the activity at issue,” defining “press entity” as a company “that disseminates news stories, commentary, and/or editorials” on a “regular basis.” The FEC considers whether the political speech at issue is publicly available and whether it’s “comparable in form to [materials] ordinarily issued” by the company. Since Kimmel’s monologues criticizing Trump are within the scope of his usual comedy program, that means his comments fall under the media exemption.

When Doesn’t The ‘media Exemption’ Apply?

The FEC has ruled the media exemption doesn’t apply in cases where a media company is using money for political content that goes beyond its typical news or entertainment function. For instance, when comedian Stephen Colbert created his own super PAC as part of his former late night show “The Colbert Report,” which was produced by Viacom, the FEC ruled Colbert could discuss the super PAC on his show under the media exemption, as this was part of the show’s usual programming. If Viacom paid for any ads about the super PAC that aired outside “The Colbert Report,” or spent money actually running the super PAC, that would not be exempted and would count as contributions to the PAC, however, because it’s outside the scope of the show’s usual work.

Key Background

Kimmel returned to ABC on Tuesday night after the network controversially suspended his program last week, making the decision after Nexstar, which runs many ABC affiliate stations, said it would preempt Kimmel’s show due to comments the comedian made about the murder of right-wing commentator Charlie Kirk. The suspension drew widespread outrage as critics contended ABC’s response appeared to be an effort to appease the Trump administration, coming after Trump had repeatedly criticized Kimmel. Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr also suggested hours before Kimmel’s suspension that he could revoke ABC’s broadcast license over the host’s comments about Kirk’s death. ABC announced Monday that Kimmel’s program would return on Tuesday, after the network said it had “thoughtful conversations” with the late night host. Trump’s comments threatening ABC with litigation come after media companies including ABC have recently repeatedly shown a willingness to settle with the president when he’s taken action against the press, with ABC settling with Trump over comments host George Stephanopoulos made about writer E. Jean Carroll’s litigation against the president, and CBS News and parent company Paramount settling a lawsuit over “60 Minutes” by paying the president $16 million. Kimmel’s suspension also came after CBS decided to cancel “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” a decision the company contended was purely financial, but has raised controversy due to Colbert’s criticism of Trump and Paramount’s settlement with the president.

Further Reading

ForbesTrump Calls Jimmy Kimmel ‘Arm Of The DNC’—Signals He May Sue ABC As Comedian Returns To AirForbesJimmy Kimmel Calls Out FCC Chair And Trump As He Returns To ABCForbes‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ Returns Tuesday—But Not On Sinclair-Owned StationsForbesLegal Experts Accuse Trump Administration Of Unconstitutionally Influencing Kimmel Suspension—Here’s Why

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/09/24/trump-threatens-lawsuit-over-abc-resuming-kimmel-heres-why-his-claims-about-campaign-finance-law-are-false/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.009162
$0.009162$0.009162
-0.30%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

The post Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold is strutting its way into record territory, smashing through $3,700 an ounce Wednesday morning, as Sprott Asset Management strategist Paul Wong says the yellow metal may finally snatch the dollar’s most coveted role: store of value. Wong Warns: Fiscal Dominance Puts U.S. Dollar on Notice, Gold on Top Gold prices eased slightly to $3,678.9 […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/gold-hits-3700-as-sprotts-wong-says-dollars-store-of-value-crown-may-slip/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:33
ZKP Crypto Presale Auction: 8,000x Returns Slipping Away with Each Burned Coin

ZKP Crypto Presale Auction: 8,000x Returns Slipping Away with Each Burned Coin

Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) operates a 450-day crypto ICO, burning unsold coins each day. Supply drops through phases, plus a strong deflationary design might create
Share
coinlineup2026/01/23 01:00