Nothing on MEXC's BTCUSDT line against 240 USDT a month on YUBIT, for 15 round trips of 20,000 USDT entered and exited with limit orders, because MEXC charges makers 0% and YUBIT charges 0.04%. WithNothing on MEXC's BTCUSDT line against 240 USDT a month on YUBIT, for 15 round trips of 20,000 USDT entered and exited with limit orders, because MEXC charges makers 0% and YUBIT charges 0.04%. With
MEXC vs YUBIT: What Do Limit-Only BTC Futures Trades Cost on Each?
Nothing on MEXC's BTCUSDT line against 240 USDT a month on YUBIT, for 15 round trips of 20,000 USDT entered and exited with limit orders, because MEXC charges makers 0% and YUBIT charges 0.04%.
With market orders the month costs 120 USDT on MEXC and 480 USDT on YUBIT.
Key Takeaways
- For limit-order futures traders MEXC is our pick: 15 BTC round trips of 20,000 USDT a month cost 0 USDT on MEXC's BTCUSDT line and 240 USDT on YUBIT.
- YUBIT charges 0.04% maker and 0.08% taker on perpetuals and 0.10% on spot, per 2026 reviews citing its fee pages, against 0% and 0.02% on MEXC's BTCUSDT and 0% and 0.05% on MEXC spot.
- Market orders narrow the gap but keep the order: 120 USDT on MEXC against 480 USDT on YUBIT for the same month.
- No CoinGecko exchange page for YUBIT could be found on October 5, 2026, while MEXC scored 9 out of 10 with about 618 million USD in tracked reserves.
- YUBIT asks for no identity check on crypto trading and withdrawals, per a 2026 review, and lists about 313 spot and 293 futures pairs.
- MEXC's own regulator record in Seychelles and Dubai is set out in the trust section.
Every trade that opens and closes with a resting limit order is billed the maker rate at both ends.
On YUBIT that rate is 0.04%, and on MEXC's BTCUSDT line it is zero, which turns a routine month into a plain subtraction.
This YUBIT vs MEXC comparison prices that month both ways, with limit orders and with market orders.
What Do 15 Limit-Order BTC Round Trips Cost on YUBIT and MEXC?
YUBIT bills 240 USDT and MEXC bills nothing when a 20,000 USDT BTC perpetual is opened and closed 15 times a month with limit orders that rest on the book.
Across a full year the gap grows to 2,880 USDT against nothing at all.
A resting limit order is a maker order, and YUBIT charges makers 0.04% on perpetuals, per 2026 reviews that cite its fee pages.
On MEXC's BTCUSDT and ETHUSDT lines the maker rate is zero, as the MEXC fee page showed when read on September 10, 2026.
Each YUBIT round trip therefore costs 8 USDT to open and 8 USDT to close, 16 USDT in all, and 15 of them come to 240 USDT.
The same 15 round trips on MEXC's BTCUSDT line carry no maker fee at either end.
Switch every order to market execution and YUBIT's 0.08% taker makes the month 480 USDT, against 120 USDT at MEXC's 0.02%.
That result flips for bots, whose API orders on MEXC carry 0.06% maker and 0.08% taker fees and would turn the limit-order month into 360 USDT, above YUBIT's 240.
The MEXC View
MEXC wrote this page, so the section opens with what YUBIT does well.
It publishes a complete fee schedule, it lets users trade and withdraw crypto without an identity check, per a 2026 review, and it lists copy trading alongside about 313 spot and 293 futures pairs.
Our case rests on the maker rate and the public record: 0% against 0.04% on every resting order, 1,450 coins on CoinGecko, a Trust Score of 9 and about 618 million USD in tracked reserves.
On regulation we concede, and the trust section sets out MEXC's Seychelles and Dubai notices without trimming.
The remaining dimensions are scored in our MEXC review.
Why Does the Maker Rate Decide This Comparison?
Because limit-order traders pay it on both legs of every trade, so a 0.04% difference per order becomes 0.08% per round trip and 1.2% of position size across 15 trades a month.
YUBIT's spot line of 0.10% for makers and takers sits on the same page as its 0.04% and 0.08% perpetual rates.
MEXC prices spot at 0% maker and 0.05% taker, with 0.04% for takers who pay in MX, and its ETHUSDT perpetual at 0% and 0.01%.
A trader who only ever hits the market still pays four times YUBIT's rate on MEXC's BTCUSDT line, but the limit-order trader pays nothing at all.
Our lowest futures fees comparison shows where a 0% maker line sits among other exchanges' base perpetual rates.
How Do YUBIT and MEXC Compare on Six Dimensions?
The rows follow our review methodology, with YUBIT's figures from 2026 reviews and exchange profiles and MEXC's from CoinGecko on October 5, 2026.
YUBIT's strongest rows are its no-KYC access and its pair count; MEXC leads on fees, reserves and tracker coverage.
Dimension | YUBIT | MEXC |
Fees | Spot 0.10% maker and taker; perpetuals 0.04% maker and 0.08% taker, per 2026 reviews citing its fee pages | Spot 0% maker and 0.05% taker, 0.04% taker paid in MX; futures set per pair, BTCUSDT 0% and 0.02%, ETHUSDT 0% and 0.01%, range 0.000% to 0.040% maker and 0.000% to 0.100% taker; API futures 0.06% and 0.08% |
Coins and markets | About 313 spot pairs and 293 futures pairs, per a 2026 review | 1,450 coins and 1,834 spot pairs on CoinGecko |
Derivatives and leverage | USDT-margined perpetuals up to 200x and coin-margined contracts up to 150x, per an exchange profile | 500x on BTCUSDT and ETHUSDT and 250x on four other USDT pairs, per its announcement; not in ten regions or copy trading |
Trust checks | No CoinGecko exchange page found; no independent reserve data located; no regulator notice found naming yubit.com | Trust Score 9 out of 10; no incident recorded; about 618 million USD in tracked reserves and public audit reports; Seychelles FSA press releases of February 14, 2025 and May 26, 2026; VARA notice of fines of June 22, 2026 |
Deposits, withdrawals and KYC | No identity check for crypto trading and withdrawals; verification for fiat purchases and its card, per a 2026 review | Bank transfer, card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, third-party channels and P2P; Primary, Advanced and Institutional verification tiers |
Standout | No-KYC crypto trading; copy trading | 0% maker on BTCUSDT and ETHUSDT; tracked reserves and audit reports |
Sources by row: YUBIT's fees, pair counts and verification rules from 2026 reviews by Themoonshow and CryptoAdventure and its leverage from LiquidityFinder's exchange profile, read October 5, 2026; MEXC's tracker figures from CoinGecko the same day and its rates from its official fee page, read September 10, 2026.
How tracked reserves differ from an exchange's own reserve messaging is explained in our proof of reserves comparison.
What Do the Trust Checks Show for YUBIT and MEXC?
A blank tracker column for YUBIT: no CoinGecko exchange page could be found on October 5, 2026, and the page that does come up under a similar name belongs to YoBit, a different exchange.
No independent reserve data was located for YUBIT, and no regulator warning naming yubit.com turned up in our searches that day.
MEXC held a 9 out of 10 Trust Score the same day, with about 618 million USD in tracked reserves and no incident recorded.
Its regulator record runs the other way: a Seychelles FSA press release of February 14, 2025 lists MEXC Global LTD among companies that had not submitted a licence application, and a May 26, 2026 release announces enforcement against MX Global Ltd as the platform's current operator.
VARA in Dubai added fines on June 22, 2026, citing customers served without a licence and onboarding that fell short of local checks, per its notice of fines.
Behind the tracked reserve figure sit MEXC's own reserve audit reports, which are public.
Who Should Choose MEXC, and Who Should Choose YUBIT?
MEXC suits anyone who trades perpetuals with resting limit orders, spot buyers who want 0% maker fees, and readers who want a tracked score and reserve figure behind their balance.
YUBIT fits traders who put no-KYC crypto access and copy trading ahead of fee level and tracker coverage, and who accept a shorter public record.
One limit order on MEXC's BTCUSDT line shows a maker fee of zero on your own statement.
Six tracked platforms are weighed as YUBIT replacements in our YUBIT alternatives guide.
If you live in the United States, the United Kingdom or Australia, a home-market licence comes before any fee line in this article.
EU and EEA readers should turn to the MiCA line in the closing notice before weighing anything else here.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is YUBIT cheaper than MEXC for futures?
No: YUBIT charges 0.04% maker and 0.08% taker on perpetuals, against 0% and 0.02% on MEXC's BTCUSDT line.
Fifteen limit-order round trips of 20,000 USDT a month cost 240 USDT on YUBIT and nothing on MEXC.
What are YUBIT's trading fees?
Spot costs 0.10% for makers and takers, and perpetuals cost 0.04% maker and 0.08% taker, per 2026 reviews citing its fee pages.
YUBIT's app shows the schedule that applies to your account.
Does YUBIT require KYC?
Not for crypto trading and withdrawals, per a 2026 review.
Fiat purchases and its card require identity verification.
Is YUBIT on CoinGecko?
No exchange page for YUBIT could be found there on October 5, 2026.
For comparison, CoinGecko's MEXC page read 9 out of 10 that day.
Is YUBIT the same as YoBit?
No: YoBit is a separate exchange that does have a CoinGecko page.
YUBIT, founded in 2020, has no page there.
What leverage does YUBIT offer?
Up to 200x on USDT-margined perpetuals and 150x on coin-margined contracts, per an exchange profile.
MEXC's top tier is 500x, available on BTCUSDT and ETHUSDT.
Can I move funds from YUBIT to MEXC?
Yes, provided no perpetual position is left open: test the route with a small withdrawal to your MEXC deposit address, then send the rest.
Check your MEXC account for the chains it supports before you choose one.
Risk Warning and Regional Notice
Perpetual futures and leverage amplify both gains and losses, and positions can be liquidated for the full margin amount.
At 500x, a move of roughly 0.2% against a position can trigger liquidation, so high tiers suit only experienced traders with strict risk controls.
This article is informational for readers in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, where the platforms discussed may not be available or authorised.
In the EU and EEA, MEXC is not authorized under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).
The Dutch regulator AFM has placed MEXC on its register of non-compliant entities, which ESMA republishes, and readers in those regions should factor this status into any decision.
In a May 26, 2026 press release, the Seychelles Financial Services Authority said the company it identifies as operating the MEXC platform does not hold a licence under its Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2024, that it is initiating enforcement measures, and that the public should exercise caution when dealing with the platform.
In a June 22, 2026 notice of fines, Dubai's Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority said the entity operating as MEXC had served customers in Dubai without a licence from 2022 to April 2026 and onboarded users without meeting UAE know-your-customer requirements, and that it cooperated, complied with cease-and-desist orders and intends to seek a licence.
Nothing here is investment advice, and fees, leverage tiers, and availability change, so confirm current terms on each platform's official pages before trading.
Este artículo es proporcionado por Sarah Chen únicamente con fines informativos y no constituye asesoramiento financiero ni de inversión. Los mercados de criptomonedas implican riesgos significativos. Realiza una investigación independiente o consulta a un profesional calificado antes de tomar cualquier decisión de inversión. Las opiniones expresadas no representan necesariamente las de MEXC o sus afiliados.
Artículos populares
Ver más
MEXC vs Coinstore: ¿pagaría 120 USDT por comprar y vender 30.000 USDT en BTC?
No tiene por qué hacerlo: MEXC cobra 30 USDT por la misma operación de ida y vuelta de 30.000 USDT en BTC con órdenes de mercado, o nada con órdenes limitadas, frente a los 120 USDT que supone la comi
MEXC vs Echobit: ¿dónde cuesta menos una operación de ida y vuelta de 100.000 USDT en futuros de BTC?
MEXC cuesta menos: una posición de 100.000 USDT en futuros de BTC abierta con una orden limitada y cerrada con una orden de mercado cuesta 20 USDT en MEXC y 80 USDT en Echobit, según las tarifas publi
MEXC vs BiFinance: ¿pueden las comisiones de trading comerse una cuenta de 1.000 USDT en un año?
En BiFinance, sí: una cuenta de 1.000 USDT que compra y vende todo su saldo cada día de negociación paga 1.000 USDT en comisiones en 250 días, frente a 250 USDT en MEXC con órdenes de mercado y 125 US
MEXC vs MGBX (antes Megabit): ¿cuánto se lleva la comisión con apalancamiento 200x y un margen de 100 USDT?
MEXC sale más barato que MGBX en una operación apalancada con BTC: abrir y cerrar a mercado 20.000 USDT en futuros perpetuos de BTC —una posición a 200x con 100 USDT de margen— cuesta 8 USDT en MEXC y
Artículos relacionados
Ver másMEXC vs Coinstore: ¿pagaría 120 USDT por comprar y vender 30.000 USDT en BTC?
No tiene por qué hacerlo: MEXC cobra 30 USDT por la misma operación de ida y vuelta de 30.000 USDT en BTC con órdenes de mercado, o nada con órdenes limitadas, frente a los 120 USDT que supone la comi
MEXC vs Echobit: ¿dónde cuesta menos una operación de ida y vuelta de 100.000 USDT en futuros de BTC?
MEXC cuesta menos: una posición de 100.000 USDT en futuros de BTC abierta con una orden limitada y cerrada con una orden de mercado cuesta 20 USDT en MEXC y 80 USDT en Echobit, según las tarifas publi
MEXC vs BiFinance: ¿pueden las comisiones de trading comerse una cuenta de 1.000 USDT en un año?
En BiFinance, sí: una cuenta de 1.000 USDT que compra y vende todo su saldo cada día de negociación paga 1.000 USDT en comisiones en 250 días, frente a 250 USDT en MEXC con órdenes de mercado y 125 US
MEXC vs MGBX (antes Megabit): ¿cuánto se lleva la comisión con apalancamiento 200x y un margen de 100 USDT?
MEXC sale más barato que MGBX en una operación apalancada con BTC: abrir y cerrar a mercado 20.000 USDT en futuros perpetuos de BTC —una posición a 200x con 100 USDT de margen— cuesta 8 USDT en MEXC y
