Wu Jiezhuang: It is recommended that Hong Kong learn from the EU MiCA's cross-border coordination experience and continue to pay attention to market changes to adjust the guidelines in a timely manner

2025/06/24 07:11

PANews reported on June 24 that Hong Kong Legislative Council member Wu Jiezhuang said that after years of efforts, the passage of the Stablecoin Ordinance in Hong Kong marks the further improvement of the regulatory framework for crypto assets and demonstrates Hong Kong's foresight in financial innovation and risk management. The HKMA clearly defines stablecoins as payment tools rather than investment products, which helps the public to rationally understand their functional boundaries.

The regulations are based on international standards, establish a high-threshold licensing system, and emphasize "substantial application scenarios" and "business sustainability" to screen out compliant and capable issuers while avoiding risks caused by overheating of the market. Wu Jiezhuang particularly praised the HKMA for communicating regulatory expectations with the industry in advance through the "sandbox" mechanism, and made it clear that participation in the sandbox is not linked to license approval, which reflects the rigor and transparency of the approval process.

He believes that the challenge in the future lies in effectively connecting supervision with actual application scenarios. At present, the traditional financial system and stablecoin settlement are still in the adaptation period. The convenience, operability and financial risk prevention of stablecoins still need further breakthroughs to expand the influence of Hong Kong's compliant stablecoins. In addition, he suggested that Hong Kong learn from the cross-border coordination experience of the EU MiCA and continue to pay attention to market changes to adjust the guidelines in a timely manner.

Vyhlásenie: Články uverejnené na tejto stránke pochádzajú z verejných platforiem a slúžia len na informačné účely. Nemusia nevyhnutne vyjadrovať názory spoločnosti MEXC. Všetky práva zostávajú pôvodným autorom. Ak sa domnievate, že akýkoľvek obsah porušuje práva tretích strán, kontaktujte service@support.mexc.com a požiadajte o jeho odstránenie. MEXC neposkytuje žiadne záruky týkajúce sa presnosti, úplnosti alebo aktuálnosti obsahu a nezodpovedá za žiadne kroky vykonané na základe poskytnutých informácií. Obsah nepredstavuje finančné, právne ani iné odborné poradenstvo a nemá sa považovať za odporúčanie alebo schválenie zo strany MEXC.

Môže sa vám tiež páčiť

Spot Bitcoin ETFs Struggle as BlackRock Outflows Trigger Alarming Sixth Day of Withdrawals

Spot Bitcoin ETFs Struggle as BlackRock Outflows Trigger Alarming Sixth Day of Withdrawals

BitcoinWorld Spot Bitcoin ETFs Struggle as BlackRock Outflows Trigger Alarming Sixth Day of Withdrawals Are spot Bitcoin ETFs facing a crisis of confidence? Recent data reveals a troubling pattern of net outflows, with BlackRock’s IBIT accelerating withdrawals to $374.44 million. This marks the sixth consecutive day of negative movement, raising questions about institutional sentiment toward cryptocurrency investments. Why Are Spot Bitcoin ETFs Experiencing Sustained Outflows? The current trend in spot Bitcoin ETFs shows clear division among major players. While BlackRock’s substantial withdrawals drive the overall negative flow, other funds demonstrate continued investor interest. The total net outflows reached $135.94 million on November 5, according to Trader T data, creating concern about short-term market stability. Which Spot Bitcoin ETFs Defied the Negative Trend? Despite the overall outflow pattern, five spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded positive movement. The leaders included: Fidelity’s FBTC with $113.30 million inflows Ark Invest’s ARKB with $82.94 million Bitwise’s BITB with $16.97 million Grayscale’s Mini BTC with $21.61 million VanEck’s HODL with $3.68 million This mixed performance suggests that while some investors are pulling back, others see current conditions as buying opportunities. What Does BlackRock’s Spot Bitcoin ETF Activity Reveal? BlackRock’s IBIT has shown concerning withdrawal patterns over recent months. The current $374.44 million outflow follows earlier withdrawals of $90.48 million on June 29 and $187.84 million on July 3. This consistent pattern indicates potential institutional repositioning rather than temporary market fluctuation. How Should Investors Approach Spot Bitcoin ETFs Now? The divergence among spot Bitcoin ETFs presents both challenges and opportunities. Investors should monitor: Flow patterns across different providers Market sentiment indicators beyond ETF flows Long-term potential versus short-term volatility The current situation with spot Bitcoin ETFs reflects the natural ebb and flow of cryptocurrency markets, where periods of consolidation often follow significant movements. What’s Next for Spot Bitcoin ETFs? The future of spot Bitcoin ETFs depends on multiple factors including regulatory developments, market conditions, and institutional adoption patterns. While current outflows raise short-term concerns, the fundamental case for Bitcoin exposure through regulated vehicles remains strong for many portfolio strategies. The ongoing story of spot Bitcoin ETFs demonstrates the evolving nature of cryptocurrency adoption. As institutional players navigate this space, investors should maintain perspective about both risks and opportunities in this dynamic market segment. Frequently Asked Questions What are spot Bitcoin ETFs? Spot Bitcoin ETFs are exchange-traded funds that directly hold Bitcoin, allowing investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin’s price movements without holding the cryptocurrency directly. Why are spot Bitcoin ETFs experiencing outflows? Outflows can occur due to various factors including profit-taking, market uncertainty, portfolio rebalancing, or changing risk appetite among institutional investors. Should I be concerned about spot Bitcoin ETF outflows? While sustained outflows warrant attention, they represent normal market dynamics. Many investors view price corrections as potential entry points for long-term positions. Which spot Bitcoin ETFs are performing well currently? Fidelity’s FBTC and Ark Invest’s ARKB have shown strong inflow numbers despite the overall negative trend in the spot Bitcoin ETF category. How do spot Bitcoin ETF flows affect Bitcoin prices? Significant flows can impact short-term price movements, but Bitcoin’s long-term value depends on broader adoption, technological developments, and macroeconomic factors. Are spot Bitcoin ETFs a good long-term investment? Like any investment, spot Bitcoin ETFs carry risks and require careful consideration of your financial goals, risk tolerance, and investment timeline. Found this analysis of spot Bitcoin ETFs helpful? Share this article with fellow investors on social media to spread awareness about current market trends and investment opportunities. To learn more about the latest Bitcoin trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin institutional adoption. This post Spot Bitcoin ETFs Struggle as BlackRock Outflows Trigger Alarming Sixth Day of Withdrawals first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Podiel
Coinstats2025/11/06 03:30
Podiel