TLDR Canary Capital submitted updated registration statements for its XRP and Solana ETFs. Both ETF filings now include a reduced sponsor fee of 0.50%. The Canary Marinade SOL ETF includes staking rewards with no cuts passed on to investors. Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas confirmed that Canary filed Amendment No. 6 for its Solana spot ETF. [...] The post Canary Capital Nears SEC Nod on XRP, SOL ETFs Amid Shutdown Delay appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Canary Capital submitted updated registration statements for its XRP and Solana ETFs. Both ETF filings now include a reduced sponsor fee of 0.50%. The Canary Marinade SOL ETF includes staking rewards with no cuts passed on to investors. Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas confirmed that Canary filed Amendment No. 6 for its Solana spot ETF. [...] The post Canary Capital Nears SEC Nod on XRP, SOL ETFs Amid Shutdown Delay appeared first on CoinCentral.
Canary Capital Nears SEC Nod on XRP, SOL ETFs Amid Shutdown Delay
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
TLDR
- Canary Capital submitted updated registration statements for its XRP and Solana ETFs.
- Both ETF filings now include a reduced sponsor fee of 0.50%.
- The Canary Marinade SOL ETF includes staking rewards with no cuts passed on to investors.
- Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas confirmed that Canary filed Amendment No. 6 for its Solana spot ETF.
- The SEC may group and approve crypto ETFs once government operations resume.
Canary Capital advanced its push for approval from the U.S. SEC by updating registration statements for its XRP and SOL ETFs. The firm filed amendments for the Canary XRP ETF and the Canary Marinade SOL ETF on Friday. Both filings disclosed a 0.50% fee, a decrease from its earlier 0.95% on other products.
XRP ETF Amendment Moves Forward
Canary Capital filed its latest amendment for the XRP ETF, signaling progress in the regulatory process. The revised filing reflects a reduced sponsor fee of 0.50%, aligning it with its latest SOL product. Previously, Canary Capital set higher costs for its HBAR and Litecoin ETFs.
The updated XRP ETF registration indicates that Canary Capital is adjusting its strategy to meet the evolving expectations of the SEC. The firm did not announce structural changes but emphasized cost efficiency for investors. Canary Capital remains one of the few firms advancing XRP-based ETF filings.
This move comes amid heightened attention on crypto assets, especially as regulatory timelines remain flexible. Canary Capital continues to update its statements as it navigates changes in agency leadership. With no imposed deadline, Canary Capital awaits the next step from regulators.
Canary Marinade SOL ETF Includes Staking
Canary Capital also filed a fresh amendment for its Canary Marinade SOL ETF, which includes staking rewards without deductions. Bloomberg’s Eric Balchunas wrote, “Canary just filed Amendment #6… with/ a 0.50% expense ratio but NO CUT of the Solana staking rewards.” This places Canary Capital in direct competition with Bitwise, which offers a 0.20% fee.
The filing details Canary Capital’s decision to pass full staking rewards to shareholders, unlike some competing funds. The 0.50% fee remains consistent across its latest offerings. Canary Capital aims to strike a balance between performance and regulatory clarity.
While the fund includes staking, Canary Capital did not change its core structure. The filing suggests Canary Capital wants fast-track approval under new standards. As Amendment #6 nears completion, the firm awaits the SEC’s action.
Canary Capital submitted these updates as the U.S. government shutdown continues, which delays several pending SEC decisions. The firm may benefit if the SEC batches approvals once government operations resume. Canary Capital is preparing its ETFs under new listing rules, avoiding the 19b-4 path.
The post Canary Capital Nears SEC Nod on XRP, SOL ETFs Amid Shutdown Delay appeared first on CoinCentral.
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
You May Also Like
Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security
BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
White House adviser: Cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage
PANews reported on June 18 that according to Jinshi, a US White House adviser said that the cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage, which will create demand for the
Share
PANews2025/06/18 23:52
SEC approves Grayscale’s multi-crypto fund with XRP, SOL and ADA
GDLC's approval coincides with SEC adopting generic listing standards for crypto ETFs, which would expedite the launch process.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 10:26