Former CFTC Chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo said regulatory uncertainty in the US crypto market could benefit traditional banks more than crypto firms.Former CFTC Chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo said regulatory uncertainty in the US crypto market could benefit traditional banks more than crypto firms.

Former CFTC chairman warns US banks could benefit most from stalled crypto legislation

2026/03/10 03:44
4 min. skaitymo
Jei turite atsiliepimų ar abejonių dėl šio turinio, susisiekite su mumis crypto.news@mexc.com

As the US cryptocurrency regulatory landscape remains in flux, a senior former regulator is raising alarms that traditional banks, not crypto firms, are positioned to benefit most from the ongoing uncertainty.

Former Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo says that the long-delayed federal crypto legislation is likely to favor established financial institutions over native digital‑asset companies.

In response to this stalling, the former head of the CFTC advised US banks not to wait any longer to embrace cryptocurrencies in their operations, warning that failure to do so will leave the country behind as nations in Europe and Asia overtake it.

“Digital systems will be developed. Then American banks will wonder what happened. Our old-fashioned identity-based system won’t work anywhere outside the US, and we need to modernize. They’ll find themselves lagging,” he said, further stressing that “the banks need this clarity so they can lead in innovation instead of falling behind.” 

Several individuals sparked concerns regarding the CLARITY Act passage 

Giancarlo’s statement outlines the importance of transparent regulations for financial institutions, intended to guide them before they allocate significant funds to a newly established digital payments system. 

Regarding the ongoing dispute among banks, crypto companies, and lawmakers, sources said some banks and lawmakers expressed disapproval of rewarding stablecoin holders. According to them, this act could result in potential capital flight away from traditional banking institutions. On the other hand, crypto companies such as Coinbase, a cryptocurrency exchange, strongly supported these rewards.

Following this discovery, several individuals raised concerns about the fate of the stablecoin reward. In attempts to address this controversy, analysts noted that stablecoins, pegged to the US dollar or other assets, are considered key components of future payment systems. 

They further explained that banks see this cryptocurrency as enabling instant, low-cost transactions, while crypto firms have already begun using it for cross-border payments.

In the meantime, debates regarding the CLARITY Act’s passage have also heated up. In Giancarlo’s opinion, the likelihood of this bill being passed is roughly 60–40% at the moment. He made this assumption even though neither side involved had met the White House deadline.

Even so, reports confirmed that the CLARITY Act must pass the Senate floor before US President Donald Trump can sign it into law. In response to this requirement, Trump called for swift congressional action, arguing that the legislation would strengthen America’s leadership in digital assets.

Analysts at JPMorgan have previously projected that the legislation could pass sometime in 2025, though delays in committee hearings have slowed the process. If the CLARITY Act fails to pass, Giancarlo stated that the Chairman of the US Securities and Exchange Commission, Paul Atkins, and the Chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Mike Selig, would be forced to take the initiative to set their own regulations.

Trump calls for the urgency of passing crucial cryptocurrency regulations 

Earlier this month, Trump shared a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, alleging that major US banks are acting as an obstacle to the approval of key cryptocurrency regulations by delaying their passage. According to him, these regulations will enable the country to stay competitive in digital finance. 

He further argued that this problem extends beyond mere domestic policy. Afterwards, Trump issued a warning claiming that hesitation in passing key legislation is a recipe for losing competitive advantage, driving both capital and talent overseas, especially toward China.

“The banks are making record profits, and we will not let them weaken our strong Crypto Agenda, which could end up going to China and other nations if we don’t address the Clarity Act,” the president said. His remarks exert pressure on Congress to act as negotiations on crypto market regulation remain deadlocked.

At this moment, Trump specifically focused on the CLARITY Act after crypto supporters expressed confidence that it would provide important regulatory clarity, particularly for the American cryptocurrency market.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Atsakomybės apribojimas: Šiame puslapyje publikuojami straipsniai yra paimti iš viešų šaltinių ir pateikiami tik informaciniais tikslais. Jie nebūtinai atspindi MEXC požiūrį. Visos teisės priklauso originaliems autoriams. Jei manote, kad koks nors turinys pažeidžia trečiųjų šalių teises, susisiekite su mumis el. paštu crypto.news@mexc.com, kad jis būtų pašalintas. MEXC negarantuoja pateikiamos informacijos tikslumo, išsamumo ar aktualumo ir neatsako už jokių veiksmų pasekmes, atliktas remiantis šia informacija. Turinys nėra laikomas finansine, teisine ar kita profesionalia konsultacija ir neturėtų būti vertinamas kaip MEXC rekomendacija ar patvirtinimas.

Jums taip pat gali patikti

Winklevoss Twins Move $130M Bitcoin to Gemini Wallets

Winklevoss Twins Move $130M Bitcoin to Gemini Wallets

Crypto investors are watching the latest moves from twins Cameron Winklevoss and Tyler Winklevoss. According to blockchain tracking data, wallets linked to the
Dalintis
Coinfomania2026/03/10 20:12
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Dalintis
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00
What to Expect in Laptop Rental Services: A Cost Breakdown

What to Expect in Laptop Rental Services: A Cost Breakdown

Laptop rental services are emerging as a popular choice. This is true, especially among businesses that require temporary equipment. Renting a laptop can be an
Dalintis
Techbullion2026/03/10 20:05