The post Millionaires Think Trump Is Damaging Global Economic Stability, New Poll Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline More than 400 millionaires fromThe post Millionaires Think Trump Is Damaging Global Economic Stability, New Poll Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline More than 400 millionaires from

Millionaires Think Trump Is Damaging Global Economic Stability, New Poll Says

Topline

More than 400 millionaires from two dozen countries are calling on world leaders to increase taxes on the super rich as a new poll shows a majority of millionaires in G20 countries support the regulation of extreme wealth and worry about the role wealthy individuals, including President Donald Trump, are playing in global politics.

President Donald Trump gives a speech at the World Economic Forum on Jan. 21, 2026 in Davos, Switzerland.

Getty Images

Key Facts

Hundreds of notable names signed an open letter calling on world leaders, many of whom gathered at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland this week, to “tax the super rich” in an attempt to lessen their influence in politics.

The letter is part of a broader campaign encouraging a wealth tax by a nonprofit called Patriotic Millionaires, which also released the results of an online survey on Wednesday sent to thousands of millionaires from G20 countries, including the United States.

The letter, signed by Disney heirs Abigail and Tim Disney, actors Brian Cox and Mark Ruffalo and musician Brian Eno, among others, claims increasing taxes on the world’s richest will allow “all people” to “win back power from those who capture it, win back our democracies from those who abuse them… (and) win back our shared wealth.”

The poll, conducted by English market research agency Survation, found that 63% of the G20 3,900 millionaire respondents think extreme wealth is a threat to democracy.

More than three in four (77%) of respondents said extremely wealthy people are able to buy political influence and even more (81%) think money buys access to politicians.

Almost all respondents (82%) said they think there should be a limit to how much money politicians and political parties can receive from individuals, and only 17% said they’d be opposed to taxing the rich to fund public services and tackle the cost of living crisis.

Six in 10 respondents said Trump, who is a billionaire, has had a negative impact both on global economic stability and on affordability for everyday people since he took office last January.

Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here: joinsubtext.com/forbes.

Crucial Quote

“The super- rich have been winning for long enough, now it’s time for everyone else to win,” Eno said in a statement. “We want our security back, our communities back, the wealth of our countries back – and we want our democracies back. It’s time to tax the super-rich.”

Contra

While UBS data from before the 2024 election suggests a slight majority of millionaire Americans favored Vice President Kamala Harris over Trump, billionaires largely rallied behind Trump and the Republican party. The nation’s ultra high net worth individuals put their money into his campaign in droves, with more than 80% of federal campaign spending by the 100 wealthiest Americans in 2024 going to Republicans, the Washington Post reported. Trump raised 15 times more from the 100 richest Americans than he did during his first presidential campaign. He has continued to court the super rich throughout his presidency and welcomed several billionaires into his cabinet, including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Education Secretary Linda McMahon, among others.

Big Number

33%. That’s how many of the polled G20 millionaires said they think Trump’s presidency has benefitted their personal finances. The president has passed several laws and provisions to benefit the super wealthy since taking office, including an act to increase the estate tax exemption and cutting international business taxes.

Tangent

Trump has “used the office of the presidency” to increase his personal wealth by at least $1.4 billion, the New York Times recently reported. That number, which the Times said it knows to be an under estimate, includes at least $867 million through various cryptocurrencies, $90 million in settlements from tech and media companies, $23 million from licensing his name overseas since his re-election and $28 million from an Amazon documentary about Melania Trump.

Key Background

Calls to address wealth inequality have been rising for decades, recently underscored by mounting evidence of a rapidly growing wealth gap. A recent report from Oxfam international showed that billionaire wealth jumped by over 16% in 2025, a rate three times higher than the average of the last five years. Billionaire wealth has increased by 81% since 2020, the report said, with the collective wealth of billionaires surging to $2.5 trillion in the last year. That number is equivalent to the total wealth held by the poorest 4.1 billion people in the world, per Oxfam. The World Inequality Database reports that in almost all countries, the richest 10% hold more than 50% of personal wealth. The United States ranks toward the top among nations with the most unequal distribution of wealth.

Further Reading

ForbesMillionaires Say They Are More Likely To Leave U.S. With Trump In OfficeForbesAmerica Added 1000 Millionaires A Day In 2025, 40% Of World’s Millionaires Now In U.S.ForbesMajority Of Millionaires Supports Wealth TaxForbesMillionaire Investors Prefer Harris To Trump, UBS Poll Says

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/maryroeloffs/2026/01/21/majority-of-surveyed-millionaires-think-trump-is-damaging-global-economic-stability/

Tržní příležitosti
Logo THINK Token
Kurz THINK Token(THINK)
$0.0008
$0.0008$0.0008
-5.86%
USD
Graf aktuální ceny THINK Token (THINK)
Prohlášení: Články sdílené na této stránce pochází z veřejných platforem a jsou poskytovány pouze pro informační účely. Nemusí nutně reprezentovat názory společnosti MEXC. Všechna práva náleží původním autorům. Pokud se domníváte, že jakýkoli obsah porušuje práva třetích stran, kontaktujte prosím service@support.mexc.com a my obsah odstraníme. Společnost MEXC nezaručuje přesnost, úplnost ani aktuálnost obsahu a neodpovídá za kroky podniknuté na základě poskytnutých informací. Obsah nepředstavuje finanční, právní ani jiné odborné poradenství, ani by neměl být považován za doporučení nebo podporu ze strany MEXC.

Mohlo by se vám také líbit

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Sdílet
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

The post Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold is strutting its way into record territory, smashing through $3,700 an ounce Wednesday morning, as Sprott Asset Management strategist Paul Wong says the yellow metal may finally snatch the dollar’s most coveted role: store of value. Wong Warns: Fiscal Dominance Puts U.S. Dollar on Notice, Gold on Top Gold prices eased slightly to $3,678.9 […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/gold-hits-3700-as-sprotts-wong-says-dollars-store-of-value-crown-may-slip/
Sdílet
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:33
AI in Sports: The Controversial Experiment of the Oakland Ballers’ AI Manager

AI in Sports: The Controversial Experiment of the Oakland Ballers’ AI Manager

BitcoinWorld AI in Sports: The Controversial Experiment of the Oakland Ballers’ AI Manager In the rapidly evolving landscape of technology, the boundaries of innovation are constantly being pushed. For those immersed in the world of cryptocurrency and blockchain, the concept of decentralized decision-making and experimental technology is familiar territory. So, when an independent baseball team decided to let an AI manage a game, it naturally sparked a fascinating conversation. This bold move by the Oakland Ballers wasn’t just about baseball; it was a profound experiment in AI in sports, echoing the spirit of disruption and questioning traditional structures that resonates deeply within the tech community. The Mathematical Heart of Baseball and the Rise of AI in Sports Baseball, often called America’s pastime, is more than just a game of skill and athleticism; it’s a deeply mathematical sport. Every pitch, every swing, every defensive shift can be broken down into granular statistics. Major League teams employ legions of data engineers to crunch numbers, seeking minute advantages that can influence managerial decisions. This data-driven approach, while effective, sometimes leads to an almost absurd level of overanalysis, reminiscent of Mr. Burns in that classic Simpsons episode, who famously pulled an eight-time all-star for Homer Simpson based on ‘playing the percentages.’ This deep analytical foundation makes baseball a prime candidate for technological experimentation, especially with artificial intelligence. The integration of AI in sports isn’t just a futuristic fantasy; it’s becoming a tangible reality, promising to optimize strategies, enhance player performance analysis, and even redefine the role of human coaches. From predictive analytics for player injuries to real-time strategic adjustments, AI offers a new lens through which to view and manage athletic competition. The Oakland Ballers, with their independent spirit, decided to take this concept further than most, venturing into uncharted territory. The Oakland Ballers’ Bold Experiment with Baseball AI The story of the Oakland Ballers is one of resilience and innovation. Founded by edtech entrepreneur Paul Freedman, the Ballers emerged as a beacon of hope for Oakland baseball fans after the painful departure of the Major League A’s. Though a minor league team, the ‘Oakland B’s’ quickly garnered a national following, winning a title in just two seasons. This unique position—a major league team in a minor league market—gave them the freedom to experiment in ways larger leagues couldn’t. Freedman explained to Bitcoin World, "We can play with things and experiment with things way before the MLB or NBA or any of those leagues could do something." This experimental ethos led them to a groundbreaking partnership with Distillery, an AI company, to develop software capable of managing a baseball game in real time. The core of this initiative was to see how a sophisticated Baseball AI could perform under live game conditions. Unlike previous fan-controlled experiments where humorous decisions often trumped strategic ones, this AI initiative aimed for pure data-driven optimization. The implications of such an experiment extend beyond the diamond, touching upon how artificial intelligence might reshape various industries, including those reliant on complex, real-time decision-making. Navigating AI Decision-Making on the Field The choice of baseball for this AI experiment was deliberate. As Freedman noted, "Baseball is the perfect place to do an initial experiment like this, because it is so data-driven, and decisions are made very analytically." The slow pace between pitches allows ample time for an AI system to process data and recommend actions. Distillery trained OpenAI’s ChatGPT on an immense dataset, including over a century of baseball statistics and specific Ballers game data, to mimic the strategic thinking of their human manager, Aaron Miles. The goal wasn’t to replace human ingenuity but to augment it. Freedman clarified, "What the AI did was figure out what our human coach would have done – the ingenuity on strategy and the concepts came from [Miles], and the ability to use the data and recognize patterns… is what the AI did throughout the course of the game." This highlights a critical distinction in the current state of AI decision-making: AI as a powerful tool for optimization, rather than an autonomous replacement for human expertise. During the AI-controlled game, the system performed remarkably, making almost identical decisions to Miles regarding pitching changes, lineup adjustments, and pinch hitters. The only instance where Miles had to intervene was due to a player’s unexpected illness, a scenario outside the AI’s programmed scope. This singular override underscores the enduring necessity of human oversight for unforeseen circumstances and ethical considerations. The manager himself, Aaron Miles, embraced the experiment with good humor, even offering the tablet running the AI for a handshake with the opposing manager, a symbolic gesture of technology meeting tradition. Aspect Human Manager (Aaron Miles) AI Manager (Distillery’s AI) Decision-making Basis Experience, intuition, real-time observation, data analysis Centuries of baseball data, Ballers’ game history, pattern recognition via ChatGPT Key Decisions Made Pitching changes, lineup construction, pinch hitters Identical decisions to Miles for pitching changes, lineup, pinch hitters Override Instances Miles overrode AI once due to player illness Required human override for unexpected player health issue Outcome of Game Smooth execution of managerial strategy Smooth execution, mirroring human decisions The Critical Role of Fan Engagement and Backlash Despite the smooth execution of the AI’s managerial duties, the experiment triggered an unexpected wave of backlash from the Oakland Ballers’ dedicated fanbase. For many, the involvement of companies like OpenAI, which powered Distillery’s AI, felt like a betrayal. Fans expressed concerns that such enterprises prioritize "winning" the AI race over thorough safety testing and ethical deployment. This sentiment was amplified by the recent history of corporate greed that led to the departure of multiple professional sports franchises from Oakland, creating a deep-seated mistrust among locals. Comments like "There goes the Ballers trying to appeal to Bay Area techies instead of baseball fans" highlighted a perceived disconnect. The issue wasn’t just about AI; it was about the broader cultural tension between technological advancement and community values. Fan engagement, crucial for any sports team, proved to be a double-edged sword. While fans had previously embraced novel concepts like fan-controlled games, the AI experiment touched a nerve related to corporate influence and the perceived erosion of authenticity. Paul Freedman acknowledged the unforeseen negative reaction, stating, "It never feels good to have your fans be like, ‘We hate this.’" The Ballers do not intend to repeat this specific AI experiment. However, the experience sparked a vital conversation about the ethical implications and societal acceptance of new technologies. This public discourse, though initially uncomfortable, is essential for navigating the complex future of AI. It underscores that while technology can optimize processes, the human element—emotion, community, and trust—remains paramount. A Look Ahead: Balancing Innovation and Community in the Age of AI The Oakland Ballers’ experiment serves as a compelling case study in the ongoing dialogue surrounding artificial intelligence. It showcased the impressive capabilities of AI in sports for data-driven strategy while simultaneously revealing the critical importance of public perception and fan engagement. The journey of the Oakland Ballers, from a team born out of protest to pioneers in sports technology, reflects a broader societal challenge: how to embrace innovation without alienating the communities it serves. As AI continues to integrate into various aspects of life, including sports and even the financial sector where cryptocurrencies thrive, understanding its practical applications and potential pitfalls becomes increasingly vital. The Ballers’ experience reminds us that while AI can be an incredible tool for optimization, the human touch, ethical considerations, and genuine connection with stakeholders are indispensable. The conversation about AI’s role in our future has just begun, and experiments like these, even with their bumps, are crucial steps in shaping that dialogue responsibly. To learn more about the latest AI in sports trends, explore our article on key developments shaping AI features, institutional adoption, and future applications. This post AI in Sports: The Controversial Experiment of the Oakland Ballers’ AI Manager first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Sdílet
Coinstats2025/09/23 04:45