Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal publicly condemned traditional banking groups for opposing the crypto exchange’s national trust bank charter application, accusing them of prioritizing protectionism over consumer protection. The pushback from banking associations intensified this week as both community banks and Wall Street lobbying groups mounted coordinated efforts to block crypto firms from securing federal banking licenses. Grewal fired back after the Independent Community Bankers of America urged federal regulators to deny Coinbase’s charter application for its subsidiary, Coinbase National Trust Company. “Imagine opposing a regulated trust charter because you prefer crypto to stay… unregulated,” Grewal wrote on X, adding that bank lobbyists are attempting to “dig regulatory moats to protect their own.“ Banking Groups Mount Coordinated Opposition The ICBA submitted a detailed opposition letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on November 3, arguing that Coinbase’s application fails to meet statutory chartering standards on multiple grounds. The banking group’s letter claims the application exhibits fundamental deficiencies in governance, profitability, sustainability, and receivership complexity, particularly during crypto bear markets when both Coinbase and its subsidiary would face simultaneous financial pressure. The ICBA letter also challenges the legal validity of OCC Interpretive Letter 1176, which permits national trust banks to engage in non-fiduciary activities beyond traditional trust services. The banking group contends that this interpretive letter was issued without the required public notice and comment procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act, rendering it legally invalid as a basis for Coinbase’s application. Meanwhile, a separate banking lobby emerged in the stablecoin debate. The American Bankers Association and 52 state banking associations submitted a joint letter to the Treasury Department on November 4, urging strict enforcement of the GENIUS Act’s prohibition on stablecoin interest payments. The coordinated response addresses what banks view as a “loophole” allowing digital asset platforms to circumvent the law by offering interest through affiliates rather than directly from stablecoin issuers. Stablecoin Interest Debate Intensifies The banking associations warned that without a broad interpretation of the interest ban, digital asset platforms may exploit loopholes through high-yield rewards and incentives, which would undermine the law’s intent to keep stablecoins as payment tools rather than investment vehicles. Senator Mike Rounds previously told Politico the interest workaround “looks like an end-run on the original legislation.” At the same time, Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller stated stablecoins should function as pure payment instruments, not interest-bearing deposits. “It’s not an investment vehicle. It’s not a time deposit where you’re holding it to earn interest,” he said. The banking groups argue that interest-bearing stablecoins could trigger a 25.9% loss in bank deposits, eliminating approximately $1.5 trillion in lending capacity and shrinking small business and farm credit by $110 billion and $62 billion, respectively. Community banks serving rural and underserved areas would face disproportionate impact from deposit outflows to yield-generating stablecoins. Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad dismissed the banking concerns, stating that the GENIUS Act explicitly permits third-party rewards programs and distinguishes them from issuer-paid interest. “Congress answered this question,” Shirzad wrote, suggesting the banking industry’s letter acknowledges this distinction while attempting to reopen settled legislative intent. Review Process and Industry Implications The OCC is expected to take between 12 and 18 months to review Coinbase’s application, with public comments potentially influencing the agency’s decision. The agency is currently led by Comptroller Jonathan Gould, a former chief legal officer of Bitfury, who has criticized the banking sector’s reluctance to work with crypto companies. Beyond Coinbase, similar opposition from the Bank Policy Institute targets trust charter applications from Ripple, Circle, and Paxos. Anchorage Digital remains the only crypto firm with an approved national trust bank charter, granted in January 2021. Looking forward, the concentrated wave of banking industry resistance shows that traditional financial institutions view crypto firms’ pursuit of federal charters as a fundamental threat to their competitive position in custody and payment servicesCoinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal publicly condemned traditional banking groups for opposing the crypto exchange’s national trust bank charter application, accusing them of prioritizing protectionism over consumer protection. The pushback from banking associations intensified this week as both community banks and Wall Street lobbying groups mounted coordinated efforts to block crypto firms from securing federal banking licenses. Grewal fired back after the Independent Community Bankers of America urged federal regulators to deny Coinbase’s charter application for its subsidiary, Coinbase National Trust Company. “Imagine opposing a regulated trust charter because you prefer crypto to stay… unregulated,” Grewal wrote on X, adding that bank lobbyists are attempting to “dig regulatory moats to protect their own.“ Banking Groups Mount Coordinated Opposition The ICBA submitted a detailed opposition letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on November 3, arguing that Coinbase’s application fails to meet statutory chartering standards on multiple grounds. The banking group’s letter claims the application exhibits fundamental deficiencies in governance, profitability, sustainability, and receivership complexity, particularly during crypto bear markets when both Coinbase and its subsidiary would face simultaneous financial pressure. The ICBA letter also challenges the legal validity of OCC Interpretive Letter 1176, which permits national trust banks to engage in non-fiduciary activities beyond traditional trust services. The banking group contends that this interpretive letter was issued without the required public notice and comment procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act, rendering it legally invalid as a basis for Coinbase’s application. Meanwhile, a separate banking lobby emerged in the stablecoin debate. The American Bankers Association and 52 state banking associations submitted a joint letter to the Treasury Department on November 4, urging strict enforcement of the GENIUS Act’s prohibition on stablecoin interest payments. The coordinated response addresses what banks view as a “loophole” allowing digital asset platforms to circumvent the law by offering interest through affiliates rather than directly from stablecoin issuers. Stablecoin Interest Debate Intensifies The banking associations warned that without a broad interpretation of the interest ban, digital asset platforms may exploit loopholes through high-yield rewards and incentives, which would undermine the law’s intent to keep stablecoins as payment tools rather than investment vehicles. Senator Mike Rounds previously told Politico the interest workaround “looks like an end-run on the original legislation.” At the same time, Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller stated stablecoins should function as pure payment instruments, not interest-bearing deposits. “It’s not an investment vehicle. It’s not a time deposit where you’re holding it to earn interest,” he said. The banking groups argue that interest-bearing stablecoins could trigger a 25.9% loss in bank deposits, eliminating approximately $1.5 trillion in lending capacity and shrinking small business and farm credit by $110 billion and $62 billion, respectively. Community banks serving rural and underserved areas would face disproportionate impact from deposit outflows to yield-generating stablecoins. Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad dismissed the banking concerns, stating that the GENIUS Act explicitly permits third-party rewards programs and distinguishes them from issuer-paid interest. “Congress answered this question,” Shirzad wrote, suggesting the banking industry’s letter acknowledges this distinction while attempting to reopen settled legislative intent. Review Process and Industry Implications The OCC is expected to take between 12 and 18 months to review Coinbase’s application, with public comments potentially influencing the agency’s decision. The agency is currently led by Comptroller Jonathan Gould, a former chief legal officer of Bitfury, who has criticized the banking sector’s reluctance to work with crypto companies. Beyond Coinbase, similar opposition from the Bank Policy Institute targets trust charter applications from Ripple, Circle, and Paxos. Anchorage Digital remains the only crypto firm with an approved national trust bank charter, granted in January 2021. Looking forward, the concentrated wave of banking industry resistance shows that traditional financial institutions view crypto firms’ pursuit of federal charters as a fundamental threat to their competitive position in custody and payment services

Coinbase Exec Slams Banks for Blocking Crypto Charter Bid

2025/11/05 17:54
4 min čtení
V případě připomínek nebo obav ohledně tohoto obsahu nás prosím kontaktujte na adrese crypto.news@mexc.com

Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal publicly condemned traditional banking groups for opposing the crypto exchange’s national trust bank charter application, accusing them of prioritizing protectionism over consumer protection.

The pushback from banking associations intensified this week as both community banks and Wall Street lobbying groups mounted coordinated efforts to block crypto firms from securing federal banking licenses.

Grewal fired back after the Independent Community Bankers of America urged federal regulators to deny Coinbase’s charter application for its subsidiary, Coinbase National Trust Company.

Imagine opposing a regulated trust charter because you prefer crypto to stay… unregulated,” Grewal wrote on X, adding that bank lobbyists are attempting to “dig regulatory moats to protect their own.

Banking Groups Mount Coordinated Opposition

The ICBA submitted a detailed opposition letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on November 3, arguing that Coinbase’s application fails to meet statutory chartering standards on multiple grounds.

The banking group’s letter claims the application exhibits fundamental deficiencies in governance, profitability, sustainability, and receivership complexity, particularly during crypto bear markets when both Coinbase and its subsidiary would face simultaneous financial pressure.

The ICBA letter also challenges the legal validity of OCC Interpretive Letter 1176, which permits national trust banks to engage in non-fiduciary activities beyond traditional trust services.

The banking group contends that this interpretive letter was issued without the required public notice and comment procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act, rendering it legally invalid as a basis for Coinbase’s application.

Meanwhile, a separate banking lobby emerged in the stablecoin debate.

The American Bankers Association and 52 state banking associations submitted a joint letter to the Treasury Department on November 4, urging strict enforcement of the GENIUS Act’s prohibition on stablecoin interest payments.

The coordinated response addresses what banks view as a “loophole” allowing digital asset platforms to circumvent the law by offering interest through affiliates rather than directly from stablecoin issuers.

Stablecoin Interest Debate Intensifies

The banking associations warned that without a broad interpretation of the interest ban, digital asset platforms may exploit loopholes through high-yield rewards and incentives, which would undermine the law’s intent to keep stablecoins as payment tools rather than investment vehicles.

Senator Mike Rounds previously told Politico the interest workaround “looks like an end-run on the original legislation.”

At the same time, Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller stated stablecoins should function as pure payment instruments, not interest-bearing deposits.

It’s not an investment vehicle. It’s not a time deposit where you’re holding it to earn interest,” he said.

The banking groups argue that interest-bearing stablecoins could trigger a 25.9% loss in bank deposits, eliminating approximately $1.5 trillion in lending capacity and shrinking small business and farm credit by $110 billion and $62 billion, respectively.

Community banks serving rural and underserved areas would face disproportionate impact from deposit outflows to yield-generating stablecoins.

Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad dismissed the banking concerns, stating that the GENIUS Act explicitly permits third-party rewards programs and distinguishes them from issuer-paid interest.

Congress answered this question,” Shirzad wrote, suggesting the banking industry’s letter acknowledges this distinction while attempting to reopen settled legislative intent.

Review Process and Industry Implications

The OCC is expected to take between 12 and 18 months to review Coinbase’s application, with public comments potentially influencing the agency’s decision.

The agency is currently led by Comptroller Jonathan Gould, a former chief legal officer of Bitfury, who has criticized the banking sector’s reluctance to work with crypto companies.

Beyond Coinbase, similar opposition from the Bank Policy Institute targets trust charter applications from Ripple, Circle, and Paxos. Anchorage Digital remains the only crypto firm with an approved national trust bank charter, granted in January 2021.

Looking forward, the concentrated wave of banking industry resistance shows that traditional financial institutions view crypto firms’ pursuit of federal charters as a fundamental threat to their competitive position in custody and payment services.

Tržní příležitosti
Logo CreatorBid
Kurz CreatorBid(BID)
$0.009031
$0.009031$0.009031
+1.76%
USD
Graf aktuální ceny CreatorBid (BID)
Prohlášení: Články sdílené na této stránce pochází z veřejných platforem a jsou poskytovány pouze pro informační účely. Nemusí nutně reprezentovat názory společnosti MEXC. Všechna práva náleží původním autorům. Pokud se domníváte, že jakýkoli obsah porušuje práva třetích stran, kontaktujte prosím crypto.news@mexc.com a my obsah odstraníme. Společnost MEXC nezaručuje přesnost, úplnost ani aktuálnost obsahu a neodpovídá za kroky podniknuté na základě poskytnutých informací. Obsah nepředstavuje finanční, právní ani jiné odborné poradenství, ani by neměl být považován za doporučení nebo podporu ze strany MEXC.

Mohlo by se vám také líbit

Trump promising mass White House pardons: report

Trump promising mass White House pardons: report

President Donald Trump is promising mass pardons to White House staff, and has done so repeatedly, the Wall Street Journal reports.“I’ll pardon everyone who has
Sdílet
Alternet2026/04/11 04:34
Kaspa Gained 10.02% in Last Month and is Predicted to Drop to $0.028204 By Apr 06, 2026

Kaspa Gained 10.02% in Last Month and is Predicted to Drop to $0.028204 By Apr 06, 2026

The post Kaspa Gained 10.02% in Last Month and is Predicted to Drop to $0.028204 By Apr 06, 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclaimer: This is not investment
Sdílet
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/04/02 18:13
Vitalik Buterin Reveals Ethereum’s Bold Plan to Stay Quantum-Secure and Simple!

Vitalik Buterin Reveals Ethereum’s Bold Plan to Stay Quantum-Secure and Simple!

Buterin unveils Ethereum’s strategy to tackle quantum security challenges ahead. Ethereum focuses on simplifying architecture while boosting security for users. Ethereum’s market stability grows as Buterin’s roadmap gains investor confidence. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin has unveiled his long-term vision for the blockchain, focusing on making Ethereum quantum-secure while maintaining its simplicity for users. Buterin presented his roadmap at the Japanese Developer Conference, and splits the future of Ethereum into three phases: short-term, mid-term, and long-term. Buterin’s most ambitious goal for Ethereum is to safeguard the blockchain against the threats posed by quantum computing.  The danger of such future developments is that the future may call into question the cryptographic security of most blockchain systems, and Ethereum will be able to remain ahead thanks to more sophisticated mathematical techniques to ensure the safety and integrity of its protocols. Buterin is committed to ensuring that Ethereum evolves in a way that not only meets today’s security challenges but also prepares for the unknowns of tomorrow. Also Read: Ethereum Giant The Ether Machine Takes Major Step Toward Going Public! However, in spite of such high ambitions, Buterin insisted that Ethereum also needed to simplify its architecture. An important aspect of this vision is to remove unnecessary complexity and make Ethereum more accessible and maintainable without losing its strong security capabilities. Security and simplicity form the core of Buterin’s strategy, as they guarantee that the users of Ethereum experience both security and smooth processes. Focus on Speed and Efficiency in the Short-Term In the short term, Buterin aims to enhance Ethereum’s transaction efficiency, a crucial step toward improving scalability and reducing transaction costs. These advantages are attributed to the fact that, within the mid-term, Ethereum is planning to enhance the speed of transactions in layer-2 networks. According to Butterin, this is part of Ethereum’s expansion, particularly because there is still more need to use blockchain technology to date. The other important aspect of Ethereum’s development is the layer-2 solutions. Buterin supports an approach in which the layer-2 networks are dependent on layer-1 to perform some essential tasks like data security, proof, and censorship resistance. This will enable the layer-2 systems of Ethereum to be concerned with verifying and sequencing transactions, which will improve the overall speed and efficiency of the network. Ethereum’s Market Stability Reflects Confidence in Long-Term Strategy Ethereum’s market performance has remained solid, with the cryptocurrency holding steady above $4,000. Currently priced at $4,492.15, Ethereum has experienced a slight 0.93% increase over the last 24 hours, while its trading volume surged by 8.72%, reaching $34.14 billion. These figures point to growing investor confidence in Ethereum’s long-term vision. The crypto community remains optimistic about Ethereum’s future, with many predicting the price could rise to $5,500 by mid-October. Buterin’s clear, forward-thinking strategy continues to build trust in Ethereum as one of the most secure and scalable blockchain platforms in the market. Also Read: Whales Dump 200 Million XRP in Just 2 Weeks – Is XRP’s Price on the Verge of Collapse? The post Vitalik Buterin Reveals Ethereum’s Bold Plan to Stay Quantum-Secure and Simple! appeared first on 36Crypto.
Sdílet
Coinstats2025/09/18 01:22

USD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APR

USD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APRUSD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APR

New users: stake for up to 600% APR. Limited time!