AZO vs VRT Stock Comparison: Price, Growth & Valuation (2026)
Use MEXC Stock Compare for a detailed AZO vs VRT analysis. Compare AZO and VRT across price performance, growth, valuation, profitability and risk, based on market data and the latest reported financials.
AZO vs VRT Stock Comparison Summary
AZO reported year-over-year revenue growth of 5.7%, compared with 26.2% for VRT. Their P/E ratios are 19.0x and 54.3x, dividend yields are 0.00% and 0.09%, and 30-day volatility levels are 25.5% and 58.8%, respectively. These metrics highlight key differences in growth, valuation, dividend income and market risk. Overall neither stock has a clear lead based on the selected metrics.
Risk Disclaimer: MEXC Stock Compare provides information and comparisons on actual U.S.-listed stocks for reference only. Data may be delayed or inaccurate, does not constitute investment advice, and past performance does not guarantee future results.
AZO vs VRT Stock Return Comparison (1W)
Compare the cumulative total returns of AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) over the selected 1W period. Data as of 2026-09-29 12:00:00.
AZO vs VRT Key Equity Metrics Comparison Summary
AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) has a market capitalization of $48.09B and operates in the Consumer Discretionary sector, with its main business classified under Automotive Retail. Its latest quarterly revenue changed +5.7% year over year.
Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) has a market capitalization of $94.71B and operates in the Industrials sector, with its main business classified under Electrical Components & Equipment. Its latest quarterly revenue changed +26.2% year over year.
AZO vs VRT Key Stock Indicators
| Comparison Metric | AZO | VRT | Comparison results |
Stock Price & Returns Latest delayed stock price with 1-day, 1-month and year-to-date returns. | $2,945.931D: -1.3%1M: -3.9%1Y: -31.1% | $246.001D: +2.4%1M: -4.0%1Y: +71.5% | VRTWin |
Market Capitalization Total market value of the company's outstanding shares. | $48.09B | $94.71B | VRTWin |
Sector & Industry The company's market sector and primary industry classification. | Consumer Discretionary / Automotive Retail | Industrials / Electrical Components & Equipment | -- |
| Based on delayed market data, AZO is trading at $2,945.93, compared with $246.00 for VRT. Their market capitalizations are $48.09B and $94.71B, respectively. AZO operates in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while VRT belongs to Industrials. | |||
| AZO vs VRT Growth & Profitability | |||
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year change in revenue. | +5.7% | +26.2% | VRTWin |
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year change in earnings per share. | -1.7% | +112.5% | VRTWin |
ROIC Return generated from invested capital. | 55.7% | 33.6% | AZOWin |
Gross Margin / Operating Margin Profitability before and after operating expenses. | 51.8% / 18.0% | 38.0% / 19.0% | AZOWin |
| On growth, AZO posted revenue growth of +5.7% and TTM EPS growth of -1.7%. VRT, by comparison, posted revenue growth of +26.2% and TTM EPS growth of +112.5%.On profitability, AZO recorded a gross margin of 51.8%, an operating margin of 18.0%, and ROIC of 55.7%. For VRT, the corresponding figures were 38.0%, 19.0%, and 33.6%.Overall, the two stocks have different strengths across growth and profitability. | |||
| AZO vs VRT Valuation & Balance Sheet | |||
Free Cash Flow Yield Free cash flow as a percentage of market capitalization. | 3.5% | 3.1% | AZOWin |
Net Debt / EBITDA Net debt relative to EBITDA; a negative value indicates net cash. | 2.0x | 0.5x | VRTWin |
Dividend Yield / Payout Ratio Dividend returns relative to share price and the share of earnings paid as dividends. | 0.00% / 0.0% | 0.09% / 5.0% | VRTWin |
| AZO offers a higher free cash flow yield, indicating a less demanding valuation. VRT has the stronger balance sheet, while VRT provides the higher dividend yield. Overall, the two stocks differ mainly in valuation, financial strength and dividend income. | |||
| AZO vs VRT Returns & Risk | |||
Total Return (Dividend-Adjusted) Cumulative return over 1, 5 and 10 years, including dividends. | 1Y: -31.1%5Y: +69.6%10Y: +284.7% | 1Y: +71.5%5Y: +912.2%10Y: +1,790.5% | VRTWin |
30-Day Realized Volatility Annualized volatility based on the past 30 days of daily returns. | 25.5% | 58.8% | AZOWin |
Beta (5Y vs S&P 500) Sensitivity to market movements; above 1 indicates greater market volatility. | 0.44 | 2.16 | AZOWin |
| VRT has delivered stronger long-term returns, but VRT also shows higher recent volatility and market sensitivity. | |||
AZO vs VRT Valuation & Dividend Metrics
Review AZO compared with VRT across valuation, cash flow and dividend metrics, including P/E, forward P/E, free cash flow yield and dividend yield. These figures are provided for reference only and do not represent a fair-value estimate, price target or investment recommendation.
| Metric | AZO | VRT | Comparison results |
|---|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $48.09B | $94.71B | VRTWin |
P/E (TTM) | 19.0x | 54.3x | AZOWin |
P/S | 2.4x | 8.2x | AZOWin |
EV/EBITDA | 13.1x | 36.1x | AZOWin |
Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.09% | VRTWin |
AZO vs VRT Profitability Over Time
Compare AZO and VRT across gross margin and operating margin trends over time to understand how each company's profitability has changed. Based on reported financial data only; not a forecast or investment advice.
| TTM | 3Y Avg | 5Y Avg | 10Y Avg | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZO | 52.6% | 52.6% | 52.5% | 53.7% |
| VRT | 36.3% | 36.0% | 33.4% | 33.4% |
Technical & Fundamental Stock Analysis
RSI (14, daily)
AZO 52.75 • VRT 44.59
Measures short-term price momentum and helps identify possible overbought or oversold conditions.
50/200-DMA Position
AZO 50D Below / 200D Below • VRT 50D Below / 200D Below
Shows whether the stock is trading above or below its medium- and long-term trend lines.
R&D % of Revenue
AZO 0.0% • VRT 0.0%
Shows how much of revenue is invested in research and development.
Share Count Trend (3Y)
AZO Decreased • VRT Increased
Shows whether the company's share count has increased or decreased over the past three years.
Company Profiles
AutoZone, Inc.
Automotive Retail
Founded in 1979, AutoZone is the largest US-based retailer of aftermarket automotive parts and accessories, operating over 7,600 stores and generating roughly $18.9 billion in fiscal 2025 sales. Beyond its primary home market (88% of total revenue), the company also maintains a growing presence in Mexico and Brazil. AutoZone caters to two core customer segments: do-it-yourself, which account for about 69% of its domestic sales, and commercial do-it-for-me customers, which represent the remaining 31%.
Vertiv Holdings Co
Electrical Components & Equipment
Vertiv has roots tracing back to 1946 when its founder, Ralph Liebert, developed an air-cooling system for mainframe data rooms. As computers started making their way into commercial applications in 1965, Liebert developed one of the first computer room air conditioning, or CRAC, units, enabling the precise control of temperature and humidity. The firm has slowly expanded its data center portfolio through internal product development and the acquisition of thermal and power management products like condensers, busways, and switches. Vertiv has global operations today; its products can be found in data centers in most regions throughout the world.
Trade AZO & VRT Stock Futures on MEXC
Trade USDT-margined Stock Futures referencing AZO and VRT on MEXC, with 24/7 access and leverage of up to 10x. These products are derivatives, do not represent ownership of the underlying shares and involve a significant risk of loss.
Everything You Need to Know About AZO vs VRT Stocks
What is MEXC Stock Compare?
MEXC Stock Compare is a side-by-side US stock comparison tool. It helps users compare two companies across stock price performance, market cap, valuation, growth, profitability, balance-sheet strength, dividends and risk. The results are provided for research purposes only and do not constitute investment advice.
Which metrics should I use to evaluate a company's growth?
Start with revenue growth to see how quickly the business is expanding, then review EPS growth to determine whether that growth is translating into higher earnings per share. Gross margin, operating margin and ROIC help assess the quality of that growth by showing profitability and capital efficiency. A company with fast revenue growth but declining margins may be expanding without improving its earnings quality.
How do AZO and VRT compare in growth and profitability?
In the latest reported period, AZO recorded revenue growth of +5.7% and TTM EPS growth of -1.7%, compared with +26.2% and +112.5% for VRT. VRT leads on growth, while AZO has stronger profitability. This comparison is based on reported financial metrics and does not predict future performance.
What is the difference between P/E (TTM) and Forward P/E?
P/E (TTM) compares the current share price with actual earnings reported over the past 12 months. Forward P/E uses estimated earnings for the next 12 months, so it reflects market expectations but depends on forecasts that may change. Both ratios should be considered alongside growth, profitability and industry peers.
How do the risk profiles of AZO and VRT compare?
AZO has a 30-day realized volatility of 25.5% and a five-year Beta of 0.44, compared with 58.8% and 2.16 for VRT. VRT shows higher historical volatility and market sensitivity. These indicators describe historical price movements and market sensitivity, but they do not cover every source of investment risk.
What do dividend yield and payout ratio indicate?
Dividend yield shows the annual dividend relative to the current share price, while the payout ratio shows how much of a company's earnings is distributed as dividends. A higher yield may provide more income, but it can also rise because the share price has fallen. Dividend sustainability should therefore be considered together with earnings, cash flow and the payout ratio.
How should I compare a high-growth stock with a lower-valued stock?
A high-growth stock may trade at a higher valuation if investors expect its revenue and earnings to continue expanding. A lower-valued stock may offer a more conservative entry point, but the lower valuation could also reflect slower growth or higher business risk. Growth, valuation, profitability, cash flow and risk should therefore be considered together.
Which is the better stock, AZO or VRT?
There is no single answer for every investor. Growth-focused investors may place greater weight on revenue growth, EPS growth and ROIC, while income-focused investors may prioritize dividend yield and payout sustainability. Investors with lower risk tolerance may focus more on volatility, Beta and balance-sheet strength. MEXC Stock Compare presents the relevant metrics but does not provide a buy or sell recommendation.
Can I trade AZO and VRT as RealStocks on MEXC?
Eligible users can trade AZO and VRT as real US stocks through MEXC RealStocks if both stocks are currently supported. Users must first open and verify a RealStocks account with MEXC's partner licensed broker. RealStocks represents ownership of actual shares rather than tokenized stock exposure. Availability may vary by stock and region, so users should check the corresponding RealStocks trading page before placing an order.
Disclaimer
The stock prices, financial metrics, comparison results and related information displayed on this page are sourced from third-party providers and are provided for informational and educational purposes only. Data may be delayed, incomplete or inaccurate, and MEXC does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness or timeliness. The comparisons and automated summaries do not constitute financial, investment, legal or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security or financial product. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Users should independently verify the information and assess their own objectives, financial circumstances and risk tolerance before making any decision. Where MEXC stock futures or other derivative products are referenced, such products do not represent ownership of the underlying shares and may involve leverage and a substantial risk of loss. Product availability is subject to applicable laws and regional restrictions.