In dismissing the case, the Sandiganbayan rules that the long delay violated the remaining defendants' right to a speedy trialIn dismissing the case, the Sandiganbayan rules that the long delay violated the remaining defendants' right to a speedy trial

1987 coco levy case that involved Marcoses dismissed over gov’t delay

2026/03/19 11:00
Okuma süresi: 3 dk
Bu içerikle ilgili geri bildirim veya endişeleriniz için lütfen crypto.news@mexc.com üzerinden bizimle iletişime geçin.

MANILA, Philippines – The anti-graft court on Tuesday, March 17, dismissed a 1987 coconut levy case that originally involved as defendants the late dictator Ferdinand E. Marcos, former first lady Imelda Marcos, and the late businessman Eduardo Cojuangco Jr., citing the government’s failure to actively pursue the case.

Other original defendants included the late senator Juan Ponce Enrile, the late former Zamboanga City mayor Maria Clara Lobregat, Enrique M. Cojuangco, Marcos O. Cojuangco, Rafael Abello, and Eduardo’s firm, Agricultural Investors Incorporated (AII). Enrile and Lobregat were named because they served on the board of the state-owned United Coconut Planters Bank (UCPB).

The Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) had accused the defendants of conspiring to defraud the government of P426 million invested by AII in a 1974 project to produce hybrid coconut seedlings on Bugsuk Island, Palawan.

The 2nd Division of the Sandiganbayan dismissed the case against the remaining defendants – Enrique Cojuangco, Marcos O. Cojuangco, Abello, and AII. It stated that the long delay violated the their right to a speedy trial.

The court said Civil Case No. 0033-C, one of eight cases derived from the original complaint, had dragged on for more than 30 years, including a third amendment.

“Such a period is unreasonably excessive by any standard,” read part of the court’s ruling.

The Sandiganbayan also noted that the government “failed to prosecute this case within a reasonable timeframe” as lawyers repeatedly filed motions for extension.

“While the court recognizes the complexity of the issues and the voluminous records in this case, these factors do not sufficiently justify the 30-year long delay which prejudiced the defendants. During this period, the defendants have been put under a cloud of anxiety, suspicion, and often, hostility as the case loomed over them,” the court stated.

What was the case about?

The Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) had accused the defendants of conspiracy to defraud the government of P426 million, which AII invested in the 1974 project to grow hybrid coconut seedlings on Bugsuk Island, Palawan.

The money came from coconut farmers’ contributions to the Coconut Industry Development Fund (CIDF). The fund, part of the coconut levy, was first managed by the National Investment Development Corporation (NIDC) until 1978, when it was transferred to the UCPB.

UCPB officials were accused of not contesting P532.4 million in liquidated damages against the CIDF. On September 14, 1980, the bank reserved P750 million to cover any damages AII might face from the project. The project ended when former president Marcos terminated the coconut levy on August 27, 1982. UCPB then ended its agreement with AII, prompting the company to go to arbitration.

Prosecutors said the case went to a board of arbitrators with lawyers Esteban Bautista for AII, Aniceto Dideles for UCPB, and UP Law Professor Bartolome Carale as chairman. The PCGG questioned this because Eduardo Cojuangco “was president and chairman of AII while also serving as president and CEO of UCPB.”

On March 29, 1983, the board awarded P532.39 million to AII as “liquidated damages” and forfeited P426.26 million already given by NIDC. UCPB was also charged P150,000 for arbitration. 

A regional court in Makati subsequently upheld the ruling, which PCGG said the bank allowed to lapse without appeal. – Rappler.com

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen crypto.news@mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

XAG/USD struggles near $75.50 on firm hopes of Fed’s extended pause

XAG/USD struggles near $75.50 on firm hopes of Fed’s extended pause

The post XAG/USD struggles near $75.50 on firm hopes of Fed’s extended pause appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Silver price (XAG/USD) struggles to gain ground
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/19 14:04
WLFI Price Drops 4% Despite New Governance Proposal

WLFI Price Drops 4% Despite New Governance Proposal

The post WLFI Price Drops 4% Despite New Governance Proposal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Highlights World Liberty Financial (WLFI) price dropped by
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/19 14:19
SEC greenlights new generic standards to expedite crypto ETP listings

SEC greenlights new generic standards to expedite crypto ETP listings

The post SEC greenlights new generic standards to expedite crypto ETP listings appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved a new set of generic listing standards for commodity-based trust shares on Nasdaq, Cboe, and the New York Stock Exchange. The move is expected to streamline the approval process for exchange-traded products (ETPs) tied to digital assets, according to Fox Business reporter Eleanor Terret. However, she added that the Generic Listing Standards don’t open up every type of crypto ETP because threshold requirements remain in place, meaning not all products will immediately qualify. To add context, she quoted Tushar Jain of Multicoin Capital, who noted that the standards don’t apply to every type of crypto ETP and that threshold requirements remain. He expects the SEC will iterate further on these standards. The order, issued on Sept. 17, grants accelerated approval of proposed rule changes filed by the exchanges. By adopting the standards, the SEC aims to shorten the time it takes to bring new commodity-based ETPs to market, potentially clearing a path for broader crypto investment products. The regulator has been delaying the decision on several altcoin ETFs, most of which are set to reach their final deadlines in October. The move was rumored to be the SEC’s way of expediting approvals for crypto ETFs. The approval follows years of back-and-forth between the SEC and exchanges over how to handle crypto-based products, with past applications facing lengthy reviews. The new process is expected to reduce delays and provide more clarity for issuers, though the SEC signaled it may revisit and refine the standards as the market evolves. While the decision marks progress, experts emphasized that the so-called “floodgates” for crypto ETPs are not yet fully open. Future SEC actions will determine how broadly these standards can be applied across different digital asset products. Source: https://cryptoslate.com/sec-greenlights-new-generic-standards-to-expedite-crypto-etp-listings/
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:43