Iran stayed under a near-total internet blackout on Saturday as the war with the United States and Israel dragged into its second week. Internet monitor NetBlocksIran stayed under a near-total internet blackout on Saturday as the war with the United States and Israel dragged into its second week. Internet monitor NetBlocks

Iran has been under a near-total internet blackout for more than seven days

2026/03/08 04:20
Okuma süresi: 4 dk
Bu içerikle ilgili geri bildirim veya endişeleriniz için lütfen crypto.news@mexc.com üzerinden bizimle iletişime geçin.

Iran stayed under a near-total internet blackout on Saturday as the war with the United States and Israel dragged into its second week.

Internet monitor NetBlocks said the shutdown had now lasted a full seven days, with traffic inside Iran running at about 1% of normal levels.

NetBlocks said the blackout had reached hour 168 and described it as a regime-imposed national shutdown. The group said the public had been left without vital alerts and updates while officials and state media still had access. It also posted a chart showing how sharply internet traffic had dropped.

At the same time, U.S. and Israeli airstrikes continued on Saturday, one week after both countries began their campaign to strip Tehran of its nuclear and ballistic missile programs and push for regime change.

Graph from NetBlocks showing network connectivity in Iran from February 24, 2026, to March 7, 2026. The y-axis represents normalized connectivity, ranging from 0% to 100%, and the x-axis represents the dates. The green line representing Iran's connectivity normal most of the time period, with a sharp drop on the morning of February 28. The drop in connectivity aligns with nation-scale internet blackout imposed during joint military strikes by the US and Israel. The minimum and current connectivity levels are indicated as 1% and 1%, respectively. The chart has a dark background with a red horizontal arrow labeled 'SHUTDOWN', indicates the period of disruption and includes the NetBlocks logo in the lower left corner.Source: NetBlocks

NetBlocks says Iran has gone dark while airstrikes keep hitting

A similar near-blackout in Iran lasted several weeks in January during broad protests. This time, though, the shutdown is unfolding during open war, not just domestic unrest, and that makes the damage bigger.

Analysts said the loss of internet access is likely to thicken the fog of war because people on the ground cannot easily message family, post videos, document damage, or follow events as they happen.

Some analysts also said the disruption may not be coming from one cause alone. They said extra factors may also be making the outage worse.

That could mean technical strain, conflict-related damage, or other pressure on the system. Cybersecurity firms added another warning. They said Iran is also likely to answer with cyberattacks, either carried out directly by the government or by proxy groups linked to it. So the battlefield may not stay limited to airstrikes and drones. It may also spread into networks and digital systems.

NetBlocks put the scale of the blackout in plain terms. “A full week has now passed since #Iran fell into digital darkness under a regime-imposed national internet blackout,” the group said in a social media post.

It then added, “The measure remains in place at hour 168, leaving the public isolated without vital updates and alerts while officials and state media retain access.”

Masoud apologizes to Gulf neighbors as Tehran reports a drone strike in the UAE

Saturday also brought a fresh regional flare-up. Iran said it struck a U.S. air base in the United Arab Emirates shortly after President Masoud Pezeshkian said his country would stop attacking neighboring states.

Iran’s Tasnim News agency said the navy drone unit of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps attacked Al Dhafra air base south of Abu Dhabi. The UAE Ministry of Defence said on X that it detected 121 unmanned aerial vehicles on Saturday, intercepted 119 of them, and that two fell within UAE territory.

Earlier that day, Masoud tried to calm the Gulf states after a week of retaliatory strikes. “I apologize to the neighboring countries,” Masoud said. “We do not intend to invade other countries. Let us set aside all the disagreements, concerns, and resentments we have toward each other. Today, let us defend our own soil to bring Iran out of this crisis with dignity.”

But Masoud did not soften his position toward Washington.

In a statement carried by Iran’s national news agency on Telegram, he said the United States can “take their dreams to the grave; we will not surrender unconditionally.”

That apology quickly drew backlash at home. Hardline cleric and lawmaker Hamid Rasai publicly criticized Masoud on social media and wrote, “Your stance was unprofessional, weak and unacceptable.”

Donald Trump then responded on Truth Social, saying Masoud’s apology came after the “relentless U.S. and Israeli attack.”

Trump wrote, “Iran, which is being beat to HELL, has apologized and surrendered to its Middle East neighbors, and promised that it will not shoot at them anymore.” He then added, “Today Iran will be hit very hard!”

The wider region was already on edge. Gulf neighbors said they intercepted more missiles and drones headed toward their airspace from Iran.

Kuwait said on Saturday that it was cutting oil production because of “Iranian threats against safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz.” Kuwait is the fifth-largest oil producer in OPEC.

U.S. Central Command also gave its own wartime update, saying on X, “U.S. forces have struck over 3,000 targets in the first week of Operation Epic Fury, and we are not slowing down.”

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Piyasa Fırsatı
NEAR Logosu
NEAR Fiyatı(NEAR)
$1.2302
$1.2302$1.2302
+1.28%
USD
NEAR (NEAR) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen crypto.news@mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
White House adviser: Cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage

White House adviser: Cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage

PANews reported on June 18 that according to Jinshi, a US White House adviser said that the cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage, which will create demand for the
Paylaş
PANews2025/06/18 23:52
SEC approves Grayscale’s multi-crypto fund with XRP, SOL and ADA

SEC approves Grayscale’s multi-crypto fund with XRP, SOL and ADA

GDLC's approval coincides with SEC adopting generic listing standards for crypto ETFs, which would expedite the launch process.
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/18 10:26