The post QwQiao Questions Long-term Value of L1 Tokens appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Highlights QwQiao argues that major L1 networks and tokens lack lasting competitive advantages, also known as a moat, which makes it vulnerable  He believes that the main problem is that it is now too easy for users and developers to switch between different blockchains, which pulls down the long-term value of their tokens He proposed a solution, saying that blockchains should build apps and services directly on their networks On November 27, QwQiao, a partner at the Alliance DAO, shared a tweet in which he raised questions about the long-term value of L1 tokens.  (Source: QwQiao on X) In the latest post on X, he stated that he has a “hard time convincing” to hold Layer 1 (L1) blockchain tokens for the long term. His concern was not about their current high prices. Instead, he questioned their very core structure by stating that L1 networks do not have a “moat.” Without this much-needed protection, he believes that these infrastructure chains will become simple commodities, like electricity or water. Due to this, it will be unable to capture major value over time.  L1 Tokens Have No Moat: QwQiao The main point of QwQiao’s argument is very simple. He mentioned that in today’s crypto sector, there is almost no friction in preventing users, developers, or capital locked on the blockchain from leaving one blockchain for another.  According to QwQiao, it only takes a few minutes to move digital assets between different blockchains, thanks to advanced bridge technologies like Wormhole and LayerZero. The total volume of these cross-chain transfers has already surpassed billions of dollars in 2025.  For developers, the process of moving an application is also easy. Most can transfer their code across compatible chains in a few days. The rise of user-friendly development tools has even simplified the process of… The post QwQiao Questions Long-term Value of L1 Tokens appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Highlights QwQiao argues that major L1 networks and tokens lack lasting competitive advantages, also known as a moat, which makes it vulnerable  He believes that the main problem is that it is now too easy for users and developers to switch between different blockchains, which pulls down the long-term value of their tokens He proposed a solution, saying that blockchains should build apps and services directly on their networks On November 27, QwQiao, a partner at the Alliance DAO, shared a tweet in which he raised questions about the long-term value of L1 tokens.  (Source: QwQiao on X) In the latest post on X, he stated that he has a “hard time convincing” to hold Layer 1 (L1) blockchain tokens for the long term. His concern was not about their current high prices. Instead, he questioned their very core structure by stating that L1 networks do not have a “moat.” Without this much-needed protection, he believes that these infrastructure chains will become simple commodities, like electricity or water. Due to this, it will be unable to capture major value over time.  L1 Tokens Have No Moat: QwQiao The main point of QwQiao’s argument is very simple. He mentioned that in today’s crypto sector, there is almost no friction in preventing users, developers, or capital locked on the blockchain from leaving one blockchain for another.  According to QwQiao, it only takes a few minutes to move digital assets between different blockchains, thanks to advanced bridge technologies like Wormhole and LayerZero. The total volume of these cross-chain transfers has already surpassed billions of dollars in 2025.  For developers, the process of moving an application is also easy. Most can transfer their code across compatible chains in a few days. The rise of user-friendly development tools has even simplified the process of…

QwQiao Questions Long-term Value of L1 Tokens

2025/11/28 11:20
Okuma süresi: 4 dk
Bu içerikle ilgili geri bildirim veya endişeleriniz için lütfen crypto.news@mexc.com üzerinden bizimle iletişime geçin.

Key Highlights

  • QwQiao argues that major L1 networks and tokens lack lasting competitive advantages, also known as a moat, which makes it vulnerable 
  • He believes that the main problem is that it is now too easy for users and developers to switch between different blockchains, which pulls down the long-term value of their tokens
  • He proposed a solution, saying that blockchains should build apps and services directly on their networks

On November 27, QwQiao, a partner at the Alliance DAO, shared a tweet in which he raised questions about the long-term value of L1 tokens. 

(Source: QwQiao on X)

In the latest post on X, he stated that he has a “hard time convincing” to hold Layer 1 (L1) blockchain tokens for the long term. His concern was not about their current high prices. Instead, he questioned their very core structure by stating that L1 networks do not have a “moat.”

Without this much-needed protection, he believes that these infrastructure chains will become simple commodities, like electricity or water. Due to this, it will be unable to capture major value over time. 

L1 Tokens Have No Moat: QwQiao

The main point of QwQiao’s argument is very simple. He mentioned that in today’s crypto sector, there is almost no friction in preventing users, developers, or capital locked on the blockchain from leaving one blockchain for another. 

According to QwQiao, it only takes a few minutes to move digital assets between different blockchains, thanks to advanced bridge technologies like Wormhole and LayerZero. The total volume of these cross-chain transfers has already surpassed billions of dollars in 2025. 

For developers, the process of moving an application is also easy. Most can transfer their code across compatible chains in a few days. The rise of user-friendly development tools has even simplified the process of moving to non-compatible networks. 

Apart from this, it just takes weeks to launch an entirely new blockchain or application-based rollup, not years, with the help of readily available kits. 

This infrastructure makes the cost of switching blockchains low in comparison to the difficulty of moving a company’s data off a cloud service provider like Amazon Web Services (AWS).

Qw stated that “its a no brainer to believe in the exponential, but the best expression of this view is to bet on the app layer.”

QW is partner of Alliance DAO, which is an organization known as one of the most successful DAOs in the cryptocurrency space. It is also known as the DeFi Alliance. This group has helped launch major projects like Pump.fun and Fantasy Top. 

It has raised $50 million in the fundraising round by top-tier investment firms like Sequoia and Paradigm. 

Before this, Qw has also raised earlier warnings in 2025 about risks in retail ETFs, and AI tokens have proven correct. Now, his views on L1 tokens have become a topic of debate among the crypto community. 

QwQiao Thinks Vertical Integration is a Solution

QwQiao has also shared his solution for the survival of L1 networks. He argues that they must stop acting as pure infrastructure and instead fully move to own the application layer built on top of them.

the only way as far as i can see for chains to strengthen their moat is to verticalize and own the app layer. my perception is chains solana, base, and hyperliquid have come to this conclusion and r actively working on it. and ofc so do the up and coming corp chains like tempo,” he said.

He mentioned Base, an L2 network from Coinbase, as an example. It is quickly attracting a large user base of new DeFi activity.  He also mentioned Hyperliquid, which is a decentralised exchange (DEX) built on its own high-performance Layer 1 blockchain.

Source: https://www.cryptonewsz.com/qwqiao-questions-long-term-value-of-l1-tokens/

Piyasa Fırsatı
Belong Logosu
Belong Fiyatı(LONG)
$0,001881
$0,001881$0,001881
+1,51%
USD
Belong (LONG) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen crypto.news@mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

XAG/USD struggles near $75.50 on firm hopes of Fed’s extended pause

XAG/USD struggles near $75.50 on firm hopes of Fed’s extended pause

The post XAG/USD struggles near $75.50 on firm hopes of Fed’s extended pause appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Silver price (XAG/USD) struggles to gain ground
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/19 14:04
WLFI Price Drops 4% Despite New Governance Proposal

WLFI Price Drops 4% Despite New Governance Proposal

The post WLFI Price Drops 4% Despite New Governance Proposal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Highlights World Liberty Financial (WLFI) price dropped by
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/19 14:19
The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The post The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Researchers found $40 million in “risk-free” profits from mispriced markets on Polymarket in one year. Prices on some markets didn’t add up to 100%, letting traders lock in guaranteed gains. The same inefficiencies likely exist on other platforms like Myriad and Kalshi, though arbitrageurs help correct them. A new academic paper suggests there’s been a steady stream of “free money” lying around on Polymarket—and smart traders have been scooping it up. The paper, Unravelling the Probabilistic Forest: Arbitrage in Prediction Markets, is the most detailed look yet at how mispricing creeps into crypto’s most popular prediction platform. The researchers combed through a year of data, from April 2024 to April 2025, and found thousands of instances where market prices simply didn’t add up. In some cases, the prices of “Yes” and “No” shares in a single market didn’t sum to one dollar as they theoretically should, creating a risk-free profit for anyone quick enough to pounce.  In other cases, the mispricing was more subtle, involving logically related markets. For example, a market on “Trump wins the presidency” might trade at very different odds than “Republican wins the presidency,” even though those outcomes are tightly linked. By buying and selling combinations of these contracts, a savvy trader could lock in a profit no matter what happens. The researchers estimate more than $40 million in profits have already been pulled from the system by arbitrageurs, traders who specialize in sniffing out and exploiting these kinds of inconsistencies. Far from being a theoretical curiosity, this is a live and lucrative business model. Is this pattern true across all prediction markets? What’s striking is how common these opportunities are. The study found more than 7,000 markets with measurable mispricing, many in highly liquid, closely watched contracts. “Prediction markets are often treated…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:34