President Donald Trump lost it with aides after learning of reports that his administration had dropped its ongoing efforts to target law firms on his hit list.President Donald Trump lost it with aides after learning of reports that his administration had dropped its ongoing efforts to target law firms on his hit list.

Administration flip-flopped after 'angry outburst' from Trump: report

2026/03/12 02:18
2 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

President Donald Trump lost it with aides after learning of reports that his administration had dropped its ongoing efforts to target law firms on his hit list.

Within the first several months of taking office, Trump issued an executive order targeting law firms that employed lawyers such as former special counsels Robert Mueller and Jack Smith. There were other targets on Trump's list, and some of those firms acquiesced to his demands of billions of dollars in free legal services, reported the Wall Street Journal. Others, however, remain in ongoing litigation against the White House.

In a report last week, The Journal noticed that the Justice Department had dropped the ball on the case. “Top aides” tried to stop the defense of the law firm orders without directly telling Trump. The DOJ submitted a filing on Monday night indicating it would abandon all defense of the Trump order.

“I never signed off on that,” the president told aides in the Oval Office.

Staff who spoke about the incident described it as "an angry outburst by Trump."

Trump then demanded that White House officials ensure the DOJ was changing course and continuing his ongoing battle with the law firms.

The following day, the DOJ was forced to reverse its position.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced, “At the president’s direction, the Department of Justice quickly amended this filing."

The DOJ had mere days before the initial brief was due in a case meant to consolidate the suits against the order when it announced it would no longer defend it. The firms then took issue with the DOJ reversing itself, the report continued, saying it was an “unexplained about-face."

There are four law firms expected to respond at the U.S. Court of Appeals in the Washington, D.C. Circuit later this month.

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement

Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement

The post Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. What Mastercard’s Crypto Partner Program is and how it
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/12 10:44
South Africa launches HIV vaccine trial

South Africa launches HIV vaccine trial

South Africa HIV vaccine trial efforts are advancing after researchers launched the first locally developed HIV vaccine study on the continent.   South Africa expands
Share
Furtherafrica2026/03/12 09:30