CNN reporter Kaitlan Collins on Wednesday delivered a rapid-fire rebuttal after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed her network has an ulteriorCNN reporter Kaitlan Collins on Wednesday delivered a rapid-fire rebuttal after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed her network has an ulterior

CNN reporter brings receipts after press secretary accuses her of double standard

2026/03/05 04:28
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

CNN reporter Kaitlan Collins on Wednesday delivered a rapid-fire rebuttal after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed her network has an ulterior motive in its reporting.

The exchange between Collins and Leavitt kicked off during a White House press conference updating the media on U.S. progress in Iran. As reporters noted, the conflict has already resulted in the deaths of 6 members of the U.S. military.

At an earlier press scrum Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth dragged the U.S. media for seeking only to diminish the standing of Trump by reporting on the deaths of service members.

“When a few drones get through or tragic things happen its front page news. I get it. The press only wants to make the president look bad. But try for once to report the reality,” demanded Hegseth.

That was a statement that Collins carried back to Leavitt later on Wednesday.

“You just mentioned the president is going to attend the dignified transfer for these families. Given what secretary Hegseth said this morning, is it the position of this administration that the press should not prominently cover the deaths of U.S. service members?” Collins asked.

“No, it's the position of this administration that the press in this room and the press across the country should accurately report on the success of operation epic fury and the damage it is doing to the rogue Iranian regime that has threatened the lives of every single American in this room,” answered Leavitt. “If the Iranian regime had their choice, they would kill every single person in this room. And so we can all be very grateful that we have an administration and that we have men and women in our armed forces who are willing to sacrifice their own lives for the rest of us in this room, and for every American across the country and for every troop that is based in the middle east.”

“Hegseth was complaining that it was front page news, about these six service-members who were killed,” Collins corrected.

“That's not what the secretary said Kaitlan, and that's not what the secretary meant and you know it. You know you're being disingenuous,” Leavitt said. “We've never had a secretary of defense who cares more.”

“He said ‘when a few drones get through or tragic things happen its front-page news. I get it. The press only wants to make the president look bad,’” Collins recited for Leavitt. “As you know, we cover the death of service-members under every president.”

“The press does only want to make the president look bad,” Leavitt insisted. “That's a fact. Especially, you know, especially CNN and the secretary of defense cares deeply about our warfighters and our men and women in uniform he travels all across this country to meet with them, to connect with them. And your network has hardly ever probably reported on that. … And I just told you that the president of the United States will be attending their dignified transfer. So please — so please —”

“But if we only cover him attending their dignified transfer, that’s … showcasing,” Collins said amid cross-talk, adding that covering both the good and bad was the same process the press used to cover former President Joe Biden and other presidents.

“As you should Kaitlan, but you and your network know that you take every single thing this administration says and tries to use it to make the president look bad. That is an objective fact,” said Leavitt.

“I don’t think covering troop deaths is trying to make the president look bad,” Collins said.

“If you're trying to argue right now that CNN’s overwhelming coverage is not negative of President Donald Trump, I think the American people would tend to agree and your ratings would tend to disagree with that,” snapped Leavitt, ignoring that polls for Trump are at their own record lows at this point in his administration.

Collins later took the opportunity to clarify her argument for her fellow CNN anchors.

“Obviously reporting on troops deaths is not an attempt to make the U.s president look bad. It is something that happens under every U.S. president … not only President Trump but also under president Biden, during the withdrawal of Afghanistan. When those 13 service members were killed during the bombing at Abbey Gate, we reported extensively on that. ... And, also. when President Obama and President Bush and dating back to their predecessors were also in office,” Collins told anchors Boris Sanchez and Brianna Keilar.

“The reason this is covered is obviously because these are the troops who are making the greatest sacrifice that anyone can make, and it's important to cover their deaths and to remember them and to talk about why they were killed in action,” Collins added. “ … It's an important part of this, and also a costly reminder of why there is such extensive coverage over what's happening right now in the middle east, and why there are so many questions about what the president's goals are, what his exit plan in Iran is, and what he wants to see come next year.”

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 25 basis points, and Powell said this was a risk management cut

The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 25 basis points, and Powell said this was a risk management cut

PANews reported on September 18th, according to the Securities Times, that at 2:00 AM Beijing time on September 18th, the Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point interest rate cut, lowering the federal funds rate from 4.25%-4.50% to 4.00%-4.25%, in line with market expectations. The Fed's interest rate announcement triggered a sharp market reaction, with the three major US stock indices rising briefly before quickly plunging. The US dollar index plummeted, briefly hitting a new low since 2025, before rebounding sharply, turning a decline into an upward trend. The sharp market volatility was closely tied to the subsequent monetary policy press conference held by Federal Reserve Chairman Powell. He stated that the 50 basis point rate cut lacked broad support and that there was no need for a swift adjustment. Today's move could be viewed as a risk-management cut, suggesting the Fed will not enter a sustained cycle of rate cuts. Powell reiterated the Fed's unwavering commitment to maintaining its independence. Market participants are currently unaware of the risks to the Fed's independence. The latest published interest rate dot plot shows that the median expectation of Fed officials is to cut interest rates twice more this year (by 25 basis points each), one more than predicted in June this year. At the same time, Fed officials expect that after three rate cuts this year, there will be another 25 basis point cut in 2026 and 2027.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 06:54
SEC Approves Generic Listing Standards for Crypto ETFs

SEC Approves Generic Listing Standards for Crypto ETFs

In a bombshell filing, the SEC is prepared to allow generic listing standards for crypto ETFs. This would permit ETF listings without a specific case-by-case approval process. The filing’s language rests on cryptoassets that are commodities, not securities. However, the Commission is reclassifying many such assets, theoretically enabling an XRP ETF alongside many other new products. Why Generic Listing Standards Matter The SEC has been tacitly approving new crypto ETFs like XRP and DOGE-based products, but there hasn’t been an unambiguously clear signal of greater acceptance. Huge waves of altcoin ETF filings keep reaching the Commission, but there hasn’t been a corresponding show of confidence. Until today, that is, as the SEC just took a sweeping measure to approve generic listing standards for crypto ETFs: “[Several leading exchanges] filed with the SEC proposed rule changes to adopt generic listing standards for Commodity-Based Trust Shares. Each of the foregoing proposed rule changes… were subject to notice and comment. This order approves the Proposals on an accelerated basis,” the SEC’s filing claimed. The proposals came from the Nasdaq, CBOE, and NYSE Arca, which all the ETF issuers have been using to funnel their proposals. In other words, this decision on generic listing standards could genuinely transform crypto ETF approvals. A New Era for Crypto ETFs Specifically, these new standards would allow issuers to tailor-make compliant crypto ETF proposals. If these filings meet all the Commission’s criteria, the underlying ETFs could trade on the market without direct SEC approval. This would remove a huge bottleneck in the coveted ETF creation process. “By approving these generic listing standards, we are ensuring that our capital markets remain the best place in the world to engage in the cutting-edge innovation of digital assets. This approval helps to maximize investor choice and foster innovation by streamlining the listing process,” SEC Chair Paul Atkins claimed in a press release. The SEC has already been working on a streamlined approval process for crypto ETFs, but these generic listing standards could accomplish the task. This rule change would rely on considering tokens as commodities instead of securities, but federal regulators have been reclassifying assets like XRP. If these standards work as advertised, ETFs based on XRP, Solana, and many other cryptos could be coming very soon. This quiet announcement may have huge implications.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 06:14
South Korea Halts Trading as Global Markets Plunge

South Korea Halts Trading as Global Markets Plunge

The post South Korea Halts Trading as Global Markets Plunge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Korean Stock Exchange was forced to halt trading after the
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/05 07:04